Criminal history and landlord rental decisions: a New York quasi-experimental study

Abstract

Objectives

Determine the effect of a criminal conviction on landlord decisions to consider prospective tenants and the extent to which landlord responses vary based on prospective tenant’s offense type.

Methods

Using a quasi-experimental audit design, matched pairs of “testers” posing as prospective tenants called landlords across New York State to inquire about the possibility of renting a residence. Criminal conviction type was manipulated amongst equally eligible testers posing as non-offenders (control group) or as having one of three types of prior conviction: child molestation, statutory rape, or drug trafficking (quasi-experimental groups).

Results

Analyses indicate that landlords are significantly less willing to consider prospective tenants with a criminal conviction, particularly when the conviction is for child molestation, although this effect was more strongly apparent with male testers.

Conclusions

The stigma associated with a child molestation conviction greatly impacts housing outcomes, but landlord characteristics and the sex of prospective tenants influence landlord decisions. This study has important implications for offender reentry and policies that should address this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    The rent for some properties was greater than $1,500 because landlords did not list a price online and later informed testers of a higher rental price. At least three landlords listed a price online and then claimed a higher price during the phone call.

References

  1. Ahmed, A. M., & Hammarstedt, M. (2008). Discrimination in the rental housing market: a field experiment on the internet. Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burchfield, K. B., & Mingus, W. (2008). Not in my neighborhood: assessing registered sex offenders’ experiences with local social capital and social control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(3), 356–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, L. M. (2007). Landlord attitudes toward renting to released offenders. Federal Probation, 71, 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cowan, D., Pantazis, C., & Gilroy, R. (2001). Social housing as crime control: an examination of the role of housing management in policing sex offenders. Social & Legal Studies, 10, 435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards, W., & Hensley, C. (2001). Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: evaluating the problem of latent consequences in community notification laws. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans, D. N. (2013). Registration nation: The impact of sex offender laws. Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington.

  7. Fahey, J., Roberts, C., & Engel, L. (2006). Employment of ex-offenders: Employer perspectives. Boston: Crime and Justice Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Griggs, B. (2011). Homeless is not an address: states need to explore housing options for sex offenders. UMKC Law Review, 79, 757.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helfgott, J. (1997). Ex-offender needs versus community opportunity in Seattle, Washington. Federal Probation, 61, 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, K. D. (1999). The media and Megan’s Law: is community notification the answer? Journal of Humanistic Counseling Education and Development, 38, 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. La Vigne, N. G., Visher, C., & Castro, J. L. (2004). Chicago prisoners’ experiences returning home. Washington: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, B. A., Tyler, K. A., & Wright, J. D. (2010). The new homelessness revisited. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lowenkamp, C., & Latessa, E. (2002). Halfway house and community-based facility evaluation. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati, Division of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research.

  15. Massey, D. S., & Lundy, G. (2001). Use of Black English and racial discrimination in urban housing markets. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 452–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayr, S., Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Faul, F. (2007). A short tutorial of GPower. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McNeal, M. H., & Warth, P. (2013). Barred forever: seniors, housing and sex offense registration. Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, 22, 317–377.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morani, N. M., Wikoff, N., Linhorst, D. M., & Bratton, S. (2011). A description of self-identified needs, service expenditures, and social outcomes of participants of a prisoner-reentry program. The Prison Journal, 91, 347–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2011). Residential relegation of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (2008). “Myths and facts”: Current research on managing sex offenders. Albany, NY: Author. Retrieved April 16, 2014 from http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/nsor/som_mythsandfacts.htm

  21. Office of Sex Offender Management (2009). NYS sex offender residency restriction laws. Albany, NY: Author. Retrieved July 26, 2013 from http://www.theparson.net/so/residencylaws.pdf

  22. Ondrich, J., Stricker, A., & Yinger, J. (1999). Do landlords discriminate? The incidence and causes of racial discrimination in rental housing markets. Journal of Housing Economics, 8, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oyama, R. (2009). Do not (re)enter: the rise of criminal background tenant screening as a violation of the Fair Housing Act. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 15, 181–222.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pager, D. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pew Center on the States (2011). State of recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved July 26, 2013, from http://tinyurl.com/5t9v7bm

  28. Pope, J. C. (2008). Fear of crime and housing prices: household reactions to sex offender registries. Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 601–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roman, C. G. (2004). A roof is not enough: successful prisoner reintegration requires experimentation and collaboration. Criminology and Public Policy, 3(2), 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roman, C. G., & Travis, J. (2004). Taking stock: Housing, homelessness, and prisoner reentry. Washington: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sandler, J. C., Freeman, N. J., & Socia, K. M. (2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(4), 284–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Scally, C.P. (2005). Housing ex-offenders. Shelterforce, 139. Retrieved April 16, 2014 from http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/sf139.html

  33. Socia, K. M. (2011). The policy implications of residence restrictions on sex offender housing in Upstate NY. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(2), 351–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Solomon, A. L., Waul, M., Van Ness, A., & Travis, J. (2004). Outside the walls: A national snapshot of community-based prisoner reentry programs. Washington: Urban Institute. Retrieved August 15, 2013, from http://tinyurl.com/6nplonx.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Travis,J.(2005).Buttheyallcomeback:Facingthechallengesofprisonerreentry.WashingtonD.C.:UrbanInstitute.

  37. Visher, C., La Vigne, N., & Farrell, J. (2003). Illinois prisoners’ reflections on returning home. Washington: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Visher, C., La Vigne, N., & Travis, J. (2004). Returning home: Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yahner, J., & Visher, C. (2008). Illinois prisoners’ reentry success three years after release. Washington: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zevitz, R. G., & Farkas, M. A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zgoba, K. M., Levenson, J., & McKee, T. (2009). Examining the impact of sex offender residence restrictions on housing availability. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a faculty development grant from Mercy College. We would like to thank Tim Schilling, Ofia Begum, and Teal Schlueter for their help with this project. Their work was indispensable in completing the study. Also, special thanks to Devah Pager for her timely and invaluable input during early stages of study design. She is a gifted scholar and this work would not have been possible without her creativity and persistence. Finally, sincerest gratitude to Evan Misshula Arvind Verma, and Rossi Hassad for their kindness, support, and willingness to provide valuable feedback that greatly improved this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas N. Evans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evans, D.N., Porter, J.R. Criminal history and landlord rental decisions: a New York quasi-experimental study. J Exp Criminol 11, 21–42 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9217-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Drug offenders
  • Conviction
  • Housing
  • Reentry
  • Sex offenders
  • Stigma