Advertisement

Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 515–548 | Cite as

Displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas: a systematic review

  • Cody W. Telep
  • David Weisburd
  • Charlotte E. Gill
  • Zoe Vitter
  • Doron Teichman
Article

Abstract

Objectives

To conduct a systematic review examining the extent to which there is crime displacement or a diffusion of crime control benefits in social control interventions implemented in medium sized or large geographic areas.

Methods

A number of search strategies were used to identify and code eligible experimental or quasi-experimental studies that measured displacement in areas larger than crime hot spots. A total of 33 publications covering 43 quasi-experimental studies were identified as eligible. Nineteen of these publications covering 20 studies were included in a meta-analysis.

Results

The narrative results overall suggest that displacement is not a common occurrence in interventions implemented at larger units of geography and a diffusion of crime control benefits is somewhat more likely to occur. The effect sizes from the meta-analyses suggest that, while the interventions, on average, were associated with a significant decline in crime, displacement was not likely to occur. The meta-analyses found no significant overall evidence of displacement or a diffusion of benefits.

Conclusions

These findings are in line with previous reviews that have focused on displacement at smaller geographic units. When examining larger geographic scales and a broader array of interventions, spatial displacement is still a fairly unlikely occurrence.

Keywords

Diffusion of benefits Displacement Large areas Meta-analysis Systematic review 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a grant from the National Policing Improvement Agency (UK) to the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy at George Mason University. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agency. Thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful suggestions. Thanks also to David B. Wilson for his statistical advice on this review and to Breanne Cave, Lisa Dario, Jacqueline Davis, Chantal Fahmy, and Julie Hibdon for their research assistance on this project.

References

  1. Barr, R., & Pease, K. (1990). Crime placement, displacement, and deflection. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 12, pp. 277–318). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bowers, K. S., & Johnson, S. D. (2003). Measuring the geographical displacement and diffusion of benefit effects of crime prevention activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers, K., Johnson, S., Guerette, R. T., Summers, L., & Poynton, S. (2011a). Spatial displacement and diffusion of benefits among geographically focused policing interventions. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 7(3).Google Scholar
  4. Bowers, K., Johnson, S., Guerette, R. T., Summers, L., & Poynton, S. (2011b). Spatial displacement and diffusion of benefits among geographically focused policing interventions: a meta analytical review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., Waring, E. J., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: a randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2012). Hot spots policing effects on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(8).Google Scholar
  7. Broude, T., & Teichman, D. (2009). Outsourcing and insourcing crime: the political economy of globalized criminal activity. Vanderbilt Law Review, 62, 796–848.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, R. V. (1992). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. Albany: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. In M. Tonry & D. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. crime and justice: A review of research, vol. 19 (pp. 91–150). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (1993). Introduction: Criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice. advances in criminological theory, vol. 5 (pp. 1–14). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, R. V., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 2, pp. 165–184). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: an application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25, 933–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Decker, S. H., & Chapman, M. H. (2008). Drug smugglers on drug smuggling: Lessons from the inside. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eck, J. E. (1993). The threat of crime displacement. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 25, 527–546.Google Scholar
  16. Farrington, D., Gill, M., Waples, S., & Argomaniz, J. (2007). The effects of closed-circuit television on crime: meta-analysis of an English national quasi-experimental multi-site evaluation. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabor, T. (1990). Crime displacement and situational prevention: toward the development of some principles. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 41–74.Google Scholar
  18. Gill, C. E. (2011). Missing links: how descriptive validity impacts the policy relevance of randomized controlled trials in criminology. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guerette, R. T. (2009). The pull, push, and expansion of situational crime prevention evaluation: An appraisal of thirty-seven years of research. In J. Knutsson & N. Tilley (Eds.), Evaluating crime reduction initiatives. crime prevention studies, vol. 24 (pp. 29–58). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  20. Guerette, R. T., & Bowers, K. J. (2009). Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: a review of situational crime prevention evaluations. Criminology, 47, 1331–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hesseling, R. B. P. (1994). Displacement: a review of the empirical literature. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 3, pp. 197–230). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, S. D., Guerette, R. T., & Bowers, K. J. (2012). Crime displacement and diffusion of benefits. In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 337–353). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Lum, C., Koper, C., & Telep, C. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marceau, N. (1997). Competition in crime deterrence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30, 844–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McIver, J. P. (1981). Criminal mobility: A review of empirical studies. In S. Hakim & G. Rengert (Eds.), Crime spillover (pp. 20–47). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Mears, D. P., & Bhati, A. S. (2006). No community is an island: the effects of resource deprivation on urban violence in spatially and socially proximate communities. Criminology, 44, 509–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reppetto, T. (1976). Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon. Crime & Delinquency, 22, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: a randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taniguchi, T. A., Rengert, G. F., & McCord, E. S. (2009). Where size matters: agglomeration economies of illegal drug markets in Philadelphia. Justice Quarterly, 26, 670–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teichman, D. (2005). The market for criminal justice: federalism, crime control, and jurisdictional competition. Michigan Law Review, 103, 1831–1876.Google Scholar
  34. Telep, C. W., & Weisburd, D. (2012). What is known about the effectiveness of police practices in reducing crime and disorder? Police Quarterly, 15, 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Telep, C. W., Weisburd, D. Gill, C. E., Teichman, D., & Vitter, Z. (2014). Displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas. Campbell Systematic Reviews (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Trasler, G. (1993). Conscience, opportunity, rational choice, and crime. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice. Advances in criminological theory, vol. 5 (pp. 305–322). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  37. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2007). 2007 World drug report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  38. Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can the police due to reduce crime, disorder and fear? Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Sciences, 593, 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: the Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 711–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weisburd, D., & Telep, C. W. (2012). Spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits revisited: New evidence on why crime doesn’t just move around the corner. In N. Tilley & G. Farrell (Eds.), The reasoning criminologist: Essays in honour of Ronald V. Clarke (pp. 142–159). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44, 549–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Hinkle, J. C., & Eck, J. E. (2008). Effects of problem-oriented policing on crime and disorder. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(14).Google Scholar
  43. Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., & Bruinsma, G. J. N. (Eds.). (2009). Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Teichman, D., Gill, C. E., & Vitter, Z. (2011). Protocol for a systematic review: displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas. Campbell Systematic Reviews.Google Scholar
  45. Weisburd, D., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S.-M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zielenbach, S., & Voith, R. (2010). HOPE VI and neighborhood economic development: the importance of local market dynamics. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 12, 99–132.Google Scholar

References of eligible studies

  1. Allat, P. (1984). Residential security: containment and displacement of burglary. Howard Journal, 23, 100–116.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, T. (1988). An assessment of the design, implementation and effectiveness of neighbourhood watch in London. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 244, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers, K., Johnson, S., & Hirschfield, A. (2003). Pushing back the boundaries: New techniques for assessing the impact of burglary schemes. Home Office Online Report (vol. 23). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  4. Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S. D., & Hirschfield, A. F. G. (2004). Closing off opportunity for crime: an evaluation of alley-gating. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 10, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, B. (1995). CCTV in town centres: Three case studies. Crime detection and prevention series paper 68. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  6. Caeti, T. J. (1999). Houston’s targeted beat program: A quasi-experimental test of police patrol strategies. Ph.D. dissertation. Huntsville: Sam Houston State University.Google Scholar
  7. Cahill, M., Coggeshall, M., Hayeslip, D., Wolff, A., Lagerson, E., Scott, M., Davies, E., Roland, K., & Decker, S. (2008). Community collaboratives addressing youth gangs: Interim findings from the gang reduction program. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, P. J., & MacDonald, J. (2011). Public safety through private action: an economic assessment of BIDs. The Economic Journal, 121, 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corsaro, N., Brunson, R. K., & McGarrell, E. F. (2010). Evaluating a policing strategy intended to disrupt an illicit street-level drug market. Evaluation Review, 34, 513–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corsaro, N., Hunt, E. D., Hipple, N. K., & McGarrell, E. F. (2012). The impact of drug market pulling levers policing on neighborhood violence. An evaluation of the High Point Drug Market Intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 11, 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costanza, S. E., Helms, R., Ratansi, S., Kilburn, J. C., & Harmon, J. E. (2010). Boom to bust or bust to boom? Following the effects of Weed and Seed Zoning in New Britain, Connecticut, from 1995 to 2000. Police Quarterly, 13, 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummings, R. (2006). ‘What if’: the counterfactual in program evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 6, 6–15.Google Scholar
  13. Draca, M., Machin, S., & Witt, R. (2010). Crime displacement and police interventions: Evidence from London’s “Operation Theseus.”. In R. Di Tella, S. Edwards, & E. Schargrodsky (Eds.), The economics of crime: Lessons for and from Latin America (pp. 359–374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrell, G., & Thorne, J. (2005). Where have all the flowers gone?: evaluation of the Taliban crackdown against opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrell, G., Chenery, S., & Pease, K. (1998). Consolidating police crackdowns: Findings from an anti-burglary project. Police Research Paper 113. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  16. Gonzalez-Navarro, M. (2010). Deterrence and geographical externalities in auto theft. Berkeley: University of California-Berkeley Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  17. Gonzalez-Navarro, M. (2013). Deterrence and geographical externalities in auto theft. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5, 92–110.Google Scholar
  18. Goulka, J., Heaton, P., Tita, G., Matthies, C., Whitby, A., & Cooper, A. (2009). FY2006 Anti-gang initiative grants in the Central District of California: Report to the U.S. Attorney. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  19. Grogger, J. (2002). The effects of civil gang injunctions on reported violent crime: evidence from Los Angeles County. Journal of Law and Economics, 45, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Machin, S., & Marie, O. (2005). Crime and police resources: The street crime initiative. centre for economic performance discussion paper (Vol. 680). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  21. McGarrell, E. F., Chermak, S., Weiss, A., & Wilson, J. (2001). Reducing firearms violence through directed police patrol. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Novak, K. J., Hartmann, J. L., Holsinger, A. M., & Turner, M. G. (1999). The effects of aggressive policing of disorder on serious crime. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 22, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Painter, K., & Farrington, D. P. (1999). Street lighting and crime: Diffusion of benefits in the Stoke-on-Trent Project. In K. Painter & N. Tilley (Eds.), Surveillance of public space: CCTV, street lighting and crime prevention. Crime prevention studies, vol. 10 (pp. 77–122). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  24. Press, S. J. (1971). Some effects of an increase in police manpower in the 20th precinct of New York City. New York: Rand Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Roman, C. G., Cahill, M., Coggeshall, M., Lagerson, E., & Courtney, S. (2005). The Weed and Seed Initiative and crime displacement in South Florida: An examination of spatial displacement associated with crime control initiatives and the redevelopment of public housing. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.Google Scholar
  26. Salisbury, G. (2008). ‘MOPPIN’ up Dodge. Herman Goldstein Award Submission. Lancashire: Lancashire Constabulary.Google Scholar
  27. Segrave, M., & Collins, L. (2005). Evaluation of a suburban crime prevention team. Technical and Background Paper Series, No. 14. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  28. Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. P. (1995). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: “hot spots” patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12, 673–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, M. R. (2001). Police-led crackdowns and cleanups: an evaluation of a crime control initiative in Richmond, Virginia. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 60–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sturgeon-Adams, L., Adamson, S., & Davidson, N. (2005). Hartlepool: A case study in burglary reduction. Hull: University of Hull, Centre for Criminology and Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
  31. Swanson, D. D. (2010). Displacement or diffusion: A secondary analysis of the Las Vegas safe village initiative. master’s thesis. Las Vegas: University of Nevada Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  32. Tita, G., Riley, K. J., Ridgeway, G., Grammich, C., Abrahamse, A. F., & Greenwood, P. W. (2003). Reducing gun violence: Results from an intervention in East Los Angeles. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, J. M., & Chermak, S. (2011). Community-driven violence reduction programs: examining Pittsburgh’s one vision one life. Criminology and Public Policy, 10, 991–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Worrall, J. L., & Gaines, L. K. (2006). The effect of police-probation partnerships on juvenile arrests. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 579–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cody W. Telep
    • 1
  • David Weisburd
    • 2
    • 3
  • Charlotte E. Gill
    • 2
  • Zoe Vitter
    • 2
  • Doron Teichman
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, Department of Criminology, Law and SocietyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Criminology, Faculty of LawHebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  4. 4.Faculty of LawHebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations