Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence
- 3.3k Downloads
We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the published and unpublished empirical evidence on the impact of police-led interventions that use procedurally just dialogue focused on improving citizen perceptions of police legitimacy.
The systematic search included any public police intervention where there was a statement that the intervention involved police dialogue with citizens that either was aimed explicitly at improving police legitimacy, or used at least one core ingredient of procedural justice dialogue: police encouraging citizen participation, remaining neutral in their decision making, conveying trustworthy motives, or demonstrating dignity and respect throughout interactions. The studies included in our meta-analyses also had to include at least one direct outcome that measured legitimacy or procedural justice, or one outcome that is common in the legitimacy extant literature: citizen compliance, cooperation, confidence or satisfaction with police. We conducted separate meta-analyses, using random effects models, for each outcome.
For every single one of our outcome measures, the effect of legitimacy policing was in a positive direction, and, for all but the legitimacy outcome, statistically significant. Notwithstanding the variability in the mode in which legitimacy policing is delivered (i.e., the study intervention) and the complexities around measurement of legitimacy outcomes, our review shows that the dialogue component of front-line police-led interventions is an important vehicle for promoting citizen satisfaction, confidence, compliance and cooperation with the police, and for enhancing perceptions of procedural justice.
In practical terms, our research shows the benefits of police using dialogue that adopts at least one of the principles of procedural justice as a component part of any type of police intervention, whether as part of routine police activity or as part of a defined police crime control program. Our review provides evidence that legitimacy policing is an important precursor for improving the capacity of policing to prevent and control crime.
KeywordsPolice legitimacy Procedural justice Randomized field trial Systematic review
*Denotes that the study was included in the meta-analysis
- Bennett, S., Denning, R., Mazerolle, L., & Stocks, B. (2009). Procedural justice: A systematic literature search and technical report to the National Policing Improvement Agency. Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security.Google Scholar
- Berrien, J., & Winship, C. (2002). An umbrella of legitimacy: Boston's Police Department – Ten Point Coalition Collaboration. In G. S. Katzmann (Ed.), Securing our children's future (pp. 200–228). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- *Bond, C. E. W., & Gow, D. J. (1997). Policing the beat: The experience in Toowoomba, Queensland. In R. Homel (Ed.), Crime prevention studies, Vol. 7. Policing for prevention: Reducing crime, public intoxication and injury (pp. 154–173). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
- Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.Google Scholar
- *Dai, M. (2007). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinatti). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (UMI Number: 3280116).Google Scholar
- *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999a). National evaluation of weed and seed: Akron, Ohio research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/akron-oh.pdf
- *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999b). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Hartford, Connecticut research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/hartford-ct.pdf
- *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999c). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Las Vegas, Nevada research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/lasvegas-nv.pdf
- *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999d). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Manatee and Sarasota Counties, Florida research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/manatee-sarasota-fl.pdf
- *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999e). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/pittsburgh-pa.pdf
- *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999f). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Salt Lake City, Utah research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/saltlakecity-ut.pdf
- *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999g). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Seattle, Washington research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/seattle-wa.pdf
- *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999h). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Shreveport, Louisiana research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/shreveport-la.pdf
- *Eckert, R. (2009). Community policing as procedural justice: An examination of Baltimore residents after the implementation of a community policing strategy. (Master’s thesis, Villanova University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (UMI Number: 1462400)Google Scholar
- *Hall, P.A. (1987). Neighborhood Watch and participant perceptions. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (UMI Number: 0560502).Google Scholar
- Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Toronto: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Home Office (2011). Crime in England and Wales: Quarterly update to September 2010. London: Author.Google Scholar
- Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2009). Does police performance increase in importance for the public during times of security threats, and do evaluations of procedural justice decline in importance? Findings from a quasi-experimental study of antecedents of police legitimacy in Israel. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.Google Scholar
- Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- *McGarrell, E. F., & Chermak, S. (2004). Strategic approaches to reducing firearms violence: Final report on the Indianapolis violence reduction partnership. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
- Mastrofski, S.D. (2009). Systematic social observation and legitimacy policing. Presentation.Google Scholar
- Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., & Eggins, E. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11292-012-9160-1.
- Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Legitimacy in policing. Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews. http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/project/141/.
- McCluskey, J. D. (2003). Police requests for compliance: Coercive and procedurally just tactics. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
- *Panetta, M. J. (2000). Identifying and assessing citizen perceptions of police and community policing practices. (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (UMI Number: 9971979)Google Scholar
- Reiss, A. J. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- *Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Chapman, B., Dignan, J., Howes, M., et al. (2007). Restorative justice: The views of victims and offenders. Ministry of Justice Research Series (3). United Kingdom: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
- *Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., Braithwaite, J., Inkpen, N., & Teh, M. M. (1998). Experiments in restorative policing: A progress report on the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE). Canberra: Australian Federal Police and Australian National University.Google Scholar
- *Singer, L. (2004). Reassurance policing: An evaluation of the local management of community safety. Home Office Research Studies (Vol. 228). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
- *Skogan, W.G., & Steiner, L. (2004). CAPS at Ten: Community policing in Chicago - An evaluation of Chicago's alternative policing strategy. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Community Policing Evaluation Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/publications/policing_papers/Yr10-CAPSeval.pdf
- *Tuffin, R., Morris, J., & Poole, A. (2006). An evaluation of the impact of the National Reassurance Policing programme. Home Office Research Study 296. London: Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office Research.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T.R. & Murphy, K. (2011). Procedural justice, police legitimacy and cooperation with police: A new paradigm for policing. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security Briefing Paper. May 2011.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. J. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: the engagement of offenders' psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law and Society Review, 41(3), 553–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- *Young, R., Hoyle, C., Cooper, K., & Hill, R. (2005). Informal resolution of complaints against the police: a quasi-experimental test of restorative justice. Criminal Justice, 5(3), 279–317.Google Scholar
- *Zevitz, R.G., Palazzari, T., Frinzi, J.N., & Mallinger, A. (1997). Milwaukee Weed and Seed program evaluation final report. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_local/milwaukee.pdf