Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychosocial functioning among inmates in prison-based drug treatment: results from Project BRITE

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of a positive behavioral reinforcement intervention on psychosocial functioning of inmates over the course of treatment and on post-treatment self-reported measures of treatment participation, progress, and satisfaction.

Method

Male (n = 187) and female (n = 143) inmates participating in 12-week prison-based intensive outpatient (IOP) drug treatment were randomly assigned to receive standard treatment (ST) or standard treatment plus positive behavioral reinforcement (BR) for engaging in targeted activities and behaviors. Participants were assessed for psychosocial functioning at baseline and at the conclusion of treatment (post-treatment). Self-reported measures of treatment participation, treatment progress, and treatment satisfaction were also captured at post-treatment.

Results

The intervention affected female and male subjects differently and not always in a way that favored BR subjects, as compared to the ST subjects, most notably on measures of depression and criminal thinking.

Conclusions

Possible explanations for the results include differences in the male and female custody environments combined with the procedures that study participants had to follow to earn and/or receive positive reinforcement at the two study sites, as well as baseline differences between the genders and a possible floor effect among females on measures of criminality. Limitations of the study included the inability to make study participants blind to the study conditions and the possible over-branding of the study, which may have influenced the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, W. M., St. De Lore, J., & Prendergast, M. L. (2011). Developing and implementing a positive behavioral reinforcement intervention in prison-based drug treatment setting. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 43(S1), 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatham, L. R., Hiller, M. L., Rowan-Szal, G. A., Joe, G. W., & Simpson, D. D. (1999). Gender differences at admission and follow-up in a sample of methadone maintenance clients. Substance Use & Misuse, 34(8), 1137–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutra, L., Stathopoulou, G., Basden, S. L., Leyro, T. M., Powers, M. B., & Otto, M. W. (2008). A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(2), 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elk, R., Mangus, L., Rhoades, H., Andres, R., & Grabowski, J. (1998). Cessation of cocaine use during pregnancy: effects of contingency management intervention on maintaining abstinence and complying with prenatal care. Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. D., Rowan-Szal, G. A., Roark, R. R., & Simpson, D. D. (2000). Contingency management in outpatient methadone treatment: a meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 58, 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. A., Prendergast, M. L., Roll, J. M., & Warda, U. (2009). Reinforcing abstinence and treatment participation among offenders in a drug diversion program: are vouchers effective? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 935–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S. T., Heil, S. H., & Lussier, J. P. (2004). Clinical implications of reinforcement as a determinant of substance use disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 431–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iguchi, M. Y., Belding, M. A., Morral, A. R., Lamb, R. J., & Husband, S. D. (1997). Reinforcing operants other than abstinence in drug abuse treatment: an effective alternative for reducing drug use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(3), 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Traux, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H., Haug, N., Silverman, K., Stitzer, M., & Svikis, D. (2001). The effectiveness of incentives in enhancing treatment attendance and drug abstinence in methadone-maintained pregnant women. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 61(3), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K., Garner, B. R., Simpson, D., Morey, J. T., & Flynn, P. M. (2006). An assessment for criminal thinking. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Federal Probation, 5(3), 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussier, J. P., Heil, S. H., Mongeon, J. A., Badger, G. J., & Higgins, S. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction, 101, 192–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Dugosh, K. L., Arabia, P. L., & Kirby, K. C. (2008). An effectiveness trial of contingency management in a felony preadjudication drug court. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 41, 565–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M., Alessi, S. M., Carroll, K. M., Hanson, T., MacKinnon, S., & Sierra, S. (2006). Contingency management treatments: reinforcing abstinence versus adherence with goal-related activities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 592–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, M., Podus, D., Finney, J., Greenwell, L., & Roll, J. (2006). Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction, 101, 1546–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, M. L., Hall, E. A., Roll, J., & Warda, U. (2008). Use of vouchers to reinforce abstinence and positive behaviors among clients in a drug court treatment program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 35(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, K. M., & McSweeney, L. B. (2008). Depressive symptoms and baseline prefrontal EEG alpha activity: a study utilizing ecological momentary assessment. Biological Psychology, 77(2), 237–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S. R., Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. D. (2009). Gender differences in psychosocial functioning across substance abuse treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(3), 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, J. M., Higgins, S. T., & Badger, G. (1996). An experimental comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 495–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Swendeman, D., Comulada, W. S., Weiss, R. E., Lee, M., & Lightfoot, M. (2004). Prevention for substance-using HIV-positive young people: telephone and in-person delivery. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 37(Suppl.2), S68–S77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, S., McKendrick, P. V., Sacks, J. Y., & Cleland, C. M. (2011). Modified therapeutic community aftercare for clients triply diagnosed with HIV/AIDS and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. AIDS Care: Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 23(12), 1676–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, K., Higgins, S. T., Brooner, R. K., Montoya, I. D., Cone, E. J., Schuster, C. R., & Preston, K. L. (1996). Sustained cocaine abstinence in methadone maintenance patients through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. D. (2001). Modeling treatment process and outcomes (editorial). Addiction, 96(2), 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. D. (2004). A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcome. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. D., & Knight, K. (1998). TCU data collection forms for correctional residential treatment. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. Retrieved from www.ibr.tcu.edu.

  • Stitzer, M., & Petry, N. (2006). Contingency management for treatment of substance abuse. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoops, W. W., Tindall, M. S., Mateyoke-Scrivner, A., & Leukefeld, C. (2005). Methamphetamine use in nonurban and urban drug court clients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 260–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, E. (2010). Women and substance abuse: the importance of gender issues in drug addiction research. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 29, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, L. P., & Krasner, L. (1965). Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villano, C. L., Rosenblum, A., Magura, S., & Fong, C. (2002). Improving treatment engagement and outcomes for cocaine-using methadone patients. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 28(2), 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, 11075 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA

    William M. Burdon, Umma S. Warda & Michael L. Prendergast

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, 908 Jefferson Street, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA

    Jef St. De Lore

  3. FAIR Health, Inc., 575 5th Ave., 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA

    Jeff Dang

Authors
  1. William M. Burdon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jef St. De Lore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeff Dang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Umma S. Warda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael L. Prendergast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William M. Burdon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burdon, W.M., St. De Lore, J., Dang, J. et al. Psychosocial functioning among inmates in prison-based drug treatment: results from Project BRITE. J Exp Criminol 9, 45–64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9169-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9169-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation