Skip to main content

Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a commentary

Abstract

Objectives

Recent decades have seen a focus on intervention programs to reduce school bullying, in light of the severe negative consequences of such behavior. A recent meta-analysis by Ttofi and Farrington (Journal of Experimental Criminology 7: 27–56, 2011) provided encouraging findings in terms of some significant reductions in bullying and victimization achieved by many programs. They also report analyses of effect sizes associated with specific program elements and design features of the interventions. While this is an important step forward, we critique some of the strong policy implications which they draw from these latter analyses.

Methods

We discuss four important areas to substantiate this critique: analytical procedure, definitional issues, historical issues, and recent empirical data. As context, we use two particular program elements described by Ttofi and Farrington, namely use of disciplinary measures and work with peers, and one design feature, namely age of pupils.

Results

The findings for the program elements and design feature examined are complex and do not justify strong policy implications at this stage.

Conclusions

We conclude with suggestions for future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Arseneault, L., Bowes, L., & Shakoor, S. (2009). Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: “much ado about nothing”? Psychological Medicine, 29, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., & Kim, T. E. (2010). Variability in the prevalence of bullying and victimization: A cross-national and methodological analysis. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 347–362). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cowie, H., & Oztug, O. (2008). Pupils’ perceptions of safety at school. Pastoral Care in Education, 26, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cowie, H., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Peer support as a means of improving school safety and reducing bullying and violence. In B. Doll, W. Pfohl, & J. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of prevention research (pp. 177–193). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cowie, H., Hutson, N., Oztug, O., & Myers, C. (2008). The impact of peer support schemes on pupils’ perceptions of bullying, aggression and safety at school. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 13, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Garandeau, C. F., Little, T., Kärnä, A., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Dealing with bullies at school: which approach for which situations? In M. Sainio & C. F. Garandeau (Chairs), KiVa anti-bullying program: Practical viewpoints on implementation and effectiveness, and an innovative perspective from social network analysis. Symposium presented at the Biennial Meeting of the European Society for Developmental Psychology, Bergen, Norway.

  7. Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2009). Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: A metaanalysis.Pediatrics, 123, 1059–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011a). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 1–3 and 7–9. Under review.

  9. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011b). Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for comprehensive schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0025740.

  10. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011c). A large scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4–6. Child Development, 82, 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCluskey, G., Lloyd, G., Kane, J., Riddell, S., Stead, J., & Weedon, E. (2008). Can restorative practices in schools make a difference? Educational Review, 60, 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Monks, C. P. (2011). Peer victimisation in preschool. In C. Monks & I. Coyne (Eds.), Bullying in different contexts (pp. 12–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison, B. (2007). Restoring safe school communities: A whole school response to bullying, violence and alienation. Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). Bullying in school: evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Progam. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poskiparta, E., Kaukiainen, A., Pöyhönen, V., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Anti-bullying computer game as part of the KiVa program: Students’ perceptions of the game. In A. Costabile & B. Spears (Eds.), The impact of technology on relationships in educational settings: International perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sapouna, M., Wolke, D., Vannani, N., Watson, S., Woods, S., Schneider, W., Enz, S., Hall, L., Paiva, A., Andre, E., Dautenhahn, K., & Aylett, R. (2009). Virtual learning intervention to reduce bullying victimization in primary school: a controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Skiba, R., Reynolds, C. R., Graham, S., Sheras, P., Conoley, J. C., & Garcia-Vasquez, E. (2006). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. A Report by the American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Taskforce. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/cpse/zttfreport.pdf.

  18. Smith, P. K. (2010). Cyberbullying: the European perspective. In: J. Mora-Merchán & T. Jäger (Eds). Cyberbullying: A cross-national comparison. (pp. 7–19). Landau: Empirische Pädagogik.

  19. Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (Eds.). (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spiel, C., Salmivalli, C., & Smith, P. K. (2011). Translational research: national strategies for violence prevention in school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 381–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson, F., & Smith, P. K. (2011). The use and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies in schools. Research Brief DFE-RB098. https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/RSG/AllRsgPublications/Page10/DFE-RR098.

  22. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Reintegrative shaming theory, moral emotions and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 352–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., & Lösel, F. (2011). Editorial: health consequences of school bullying. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 3, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. United Nations (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva, Switzerland: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved March, 9, 2007, from http://www.unicef.org/crc.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter K. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, P.K., Salmivalli, C. & Cowie, H. Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a commentary. J Exp Criminol 8, 433–441 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9142-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bully
  • Victim
  • School
  • Intervention
  • Discipline
  • Peers