The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: an experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy
- 3.1k Downloads
To examine the impacts of broken windows policing at crime hot spots on fear of crime, ratings of police legitimacy and reports of collective efficacy among residents of targeted hot spots.
A block randomized experimental design with a police intervention targeting disorder delivered to 55 treatment street segments with an equal number of segments serving as controls. Main outcomes were measured using a panel survey of 371 persons living or working in these sites.
The broken windows police intervention delivered to crime hot spots in this study had no significant impacts on fear of crime, police legitimacy, collective efficacy, or perceptions of crime or social disorder. Perceptions of physical disorder appear to have been modestly increased in the target areas.
The findings suggest that recent criticisms of hot spots policing approaches which focus on possible negative “backfire” effects for residents of the targeted areas may be overstated. The study shows that residents are not aware of, or much affected by, a three hour per week dosage of aggressive order maintenance policing on their blocks (in addition to routine police responses in these areas). Future research needs to replicate these findings focusing on varied target populations and types of crime hot spots, and examining different styles of hot spots policing.
KeywordsHot spots policing Legitimacy Broken windows Fear of crime Disorder
This research was supported by grant no. 2007-91116-MD-IJ from the National Institute of Justice. The authors would like to thank Chief Jim Bueerman of the Redlands Police Department, Chief Jim Doyle of the Ontario Police Department and Chief Bob Miller of the Colton Police Department for their willingness to participate in an experimental study, and for their support throughout the project. Appreciation is also due to a number of graduate students who assisted with the project: Jill Christie for her tireless work supervising the survey data collection and data entry; Julie Willis for her invaluable assistance with data cleaning and geocoding; and Cody Telep, Dave McClure and Breanne Cave for their valuable comments on, and edits to, early drafts of this manuscript. Finally, thanks are also due to the anonymous peer reviewers for their helpful feedback.
- Appleyard, D. (1981). Livable streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Bloom, H. S. (2005). Randomizing groups to evaluate place-based programs. In H. S. Bloom (Ed.), Learning More From Social Experiments: Evolving Analytic Approaches. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.Google Scholar
- Braga, A. A., & Bond, B. J. (2009). Community perception of police crime prevention efforts: Using interviews in small areas to evaluate crime reduction strategies. In J. Knutsson & N. Tilley (Eds.), Crime Prevention Studies (Vol. 24, pp. 87–119). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
- Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. (2010). Policing Problem Places: Crime Hot Spots and Effective Crime Prevention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clarke, R. V., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime Prevention Studies (pp. 165–184). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Ferraro, K. F. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Green, L. (1996). Policing places with drug problems. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, P. & Petersilia, J. (1975). The criminal investigation process: Summary and policy implications. R-1776-DOJ, the RAND CorporationGoogle Scholar
- Harcourt, B. E. (2001). The illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hinkle, J. C., & Yang, S. (2008). What shapes peoples’ perceptions of disorder? An exploratory study of fear, victimization and demographics. St. Louis: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
- Hunter, A. (1978). Symbols of incivility: Social disorder and fear of crime in urban neighborhoods. Dallas: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Kelling, G. L., & Coles, C. (1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in American cities. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Kelling, G. L., Pate, T., Dieckman, D., & Brown, C. E. (1974). The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment. Washington: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
- Kochel, T. R. (2011). Constructing hot spots policing: Unexamined consequences for disadvantaged populations and for police legitimacy. Criminal Justice Policy Review (in press)Google Scholar
- Levine, J. P. (1975). The ineffectiveness of adding police to prevent crime. Public Policy, 23, 523–545.Google Scholar
- McGarrell, E. F., Chermak, S., & Weiss, A. (1999). Reducing firearms violence through directed police patrol: Final report on the evaluation of the Indianapolis Police Department’s directed patrol project. Washington: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence, Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. In W. Skogan & K. Frydl (Eds.), Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Pierce, G., Spaar, S., & Briggs, L. R. (1986). The character of police work: strategic and tactical implications. Center for Applied Social Research. Boston: Northeastern University.Google Scholar
- Rosenbaum, D. P. (2006). The limits of hot spots policing. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decline in American neighborhoods. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Spelman, W., & Brown, D. (1984). Calling the Police: Citizen reporting of serious crime. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- St. Jean, P. K. B. (2007). Pockets of crime: Broken windows, collective efficacy, and the criminal point of view. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2000). United States Census 2000. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html
- Weisburd, D. (2004). The emergence of crime place in crime prevention. In G. Bruinsma, H. Elffers, & J. Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators: Developments in criminological and criminal justice research (pp. 155–168). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
- Weisburd, D., & Braga, A. A. (2003). Hot spots policing. In H. Kury & J. Obergfell-Fuchs (Eds.), Crime prevention: New approaches (pp. 337–354). Mainz: Weisser Ring.Google Scholar
- Weisburd, D., Petrosino, A., & Mason, G. (1993). Design sensitivity in criminal justice experiments. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (Vol. 17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2004). Does crime just move around the corner? A study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, NJ. Washington: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
- Weisburd, D., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S. (Forthcoming). The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press (in press)Google Scholar
- Weisburd, D., Hinkle, J. C., Famega, C., & Ready, J. (2011). Legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy in crime hot spots: assessing the impacts of broken windows policing strategies on citizen attitudes. Final Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice (in press)Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 211, 29–38.Google Scholar