Advertisement

Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 441–463 | Cite as

Citation analysis of randomized experiments in criminology and criminal justice: a research note

  • Cody W. Telep
Article

Abstract

In recent years multiple studies have used citation analysis as a way to examine the most cited scholars and works in criminology and criminal justice and its subfields. This study is the first to focus on the most cited randomized experiments in criminological research. Using citation counts from both Social Science Citation Index and Google Scholar, and multiple sources of randomized experiments, I present the most cited experiments in six areas: policing, courts, corrections, schools, community, and early prevention. Experiments published in non-criminological (e.g., medical) journals tend to be the most cited, and early prevention research is generally cited most frequently of the six categories. I conclude by considering possible reasons why certain experiments are more cited than others.

Keywords

Citation analysis Experiments Google Scholar Social Science Citation Index 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to David Weisburd, Cynthia Lum, Joshua Hinkle, and the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments.

References

  1. Bauer, K., & Bakkalbasi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9), Retrieved 25 August 2008 from the D-Lib Magazine website: http://dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html.
  2. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (1994a). Who are the most influential criminologists in the English-speaking world? British Journal of Criminology, 34, 204–225.Google Scholar
  3. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (1994b). Who are the most-cited scholars in major American criminology and criminal justice journals? Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (1995). The validity of citations as a measure of influence in criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 35, 143–145.Google Scholar
  5. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (1996). Crime and justice and the criminology and criminal justice literature. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: a review of research (Vol. 20, pp. 265–300). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (1998a). Changes in the most-cited scholars in major American criminology and criminal justice journals between 1986–1990 and 1991–1995. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (1998b). Changes in the most-cited scholars in major international journals between 1986–90 and 1991–95. British Journal of Criminology, 38, 156–170.Google Scholar
  8. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (1999). Changes in the most-cited scholars in twenty criminology and criminal justice journals between 1990 and 1995. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2007). Changes in scholarly influence in major American criminology and criminal justice journals between 1986 and 2000. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18, 6–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Scholarly influence in criminology and criminal justice journals in 1990–2000. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohn, E. G., Farrington, D. P., & Wright, R. A. (1998). Evaluating criminology and criminal justice. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1971). Measuring the quality of sociological research: problems in the use of the Science Citation Index. The American Sociologist, 6, 23–29.Google Scholar
  13. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, A. M., Jr. (1986). What is a citation worth? Journal of Human Resources, 21, 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrington, D. P. (1983). Randomized experiments on crime and justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: a review of research (Vol. 4, pp. 257–308). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2005). Randomized experiments in criminology: what have we learned in the last two decades? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrington, D. P., Ohlin, L. E., & Wilson, J. Q. (1986). Understanding and controlling crime. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation took? Scientometrics, 1, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harzing, A.-W. K., & van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein, D. B., & Chiang, E. (2004). The Social Science Citation Index: a black box—with an ideological bias? Econ Journal Watch, 1, 134–165.Google Scholar
  22. Levi, M. (1995). The use and misuse of citations as a measure of influence in criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 35, 138–142.Google Scholar
  23. Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., & Pinkston, J. C. (2000). Neighborhood effects on economic self-sufficiency: Evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research Working Paper 159. Accessed August 11, 2009 at: http://www.northwestern.edu/ipr/jcpr/workingpapers/wpfiles/Ludwigedit.TandT_WP.PDF.
  24. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2105–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Myers, C. R. (1970). Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology. American Psychologist, 25, 1041–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shepard, E. M. (2001). The economic costs of D.A.R.E. Research paper no. 22. Syracuse, NY: Institute of Industrial Relations, Le Moyne College.Google Scholar
  27. Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (eds). (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  29. Testa, J. (2004). The Thomson Scientific journal selection process. Retrieved 25 August 2008 from Thomson Reuters website: http://www.thomsonreuters.com/business_units/scientific/free/essays/journalselection.
  30. Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2008). A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources. Scientometrics, 74, 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vine, R. (2006). Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94, 97–99.Google Scholar
  32. Weisburd, D., Ajzenstadt, M., Mazerolle, L., Wilson, D. B., Maxwell, C., & Schnurr, R. (2005). Editors’ introduction. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Thornberry, T. P. (1978). Evaluating criminology. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  34. Wright, R. A., & Friedrichs, D. O. (1998). The most-cited scholars and works in critical criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 9, 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, R. A., & Miller, J. M. (1998). The most-cited scholars and works in police studies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21, 240–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wright, R. A., Bryant, K. M., & Miller, J. M. (2001). Top criminals/top criminologists. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17, 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Policing

  1. Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). A Bayesian analysis of the Colorado spouse abuse experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 170–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., Waring, E. J., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: a randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (1997). A proactive response to family violence: the results of a randomized experiment. Criminology, 35, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunford, F. W. (1990). System-initiated warrants for suspects of misdemeanor domestic assault: a pilot study. Justice Quarterly, 7, 631–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunford, F. W. (1992). The measurement of recidivism in cases of spouse assault. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunford, F. W., Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: the Omaha Police experiment. Criminology, 28, 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirschel, D., Hutchison, I. W., & Dean, C. W. (1992). The failure of arrest to deter spouse abuse. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pate, A. M., Wycoff, M. A., Skogan, W. G., & Sherman, L. W. (1986). Reducing fear of crime in Houston and Newark: A summary report. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Pate, A., & Hamilton, E. E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: the Dade County spouse assault experiment. American Sociological Review, 57, 691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D., Rogan, D. P., Gartin, P. R., Cohn, E. G., Collins, D. J., et al. (1991). From initial deterrence to long-term escalation: short-custody arrest for poverty ghetto domestic violence. Criminology, 29, 821–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D., Rogan, D. P., Gartin, P. R., Cohn, E. G., Collins, D. J., et al. (1992). The variable effects of arrest on criminal careers: the Milwaukee domestic violence experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. P. (1995). Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: a randomized, controlled experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 755–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: a randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: the Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 711–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courts

  1. Ares, C. E., Rankin, A., & Sturz, H. (1963). The Manhattan Bail Project: an interim report on the use of pre-trial parole. New York University Law Review, 38, 67–95.Google Scholar
  2. Deschenes, E. P., Turner, S., & Greenwood, P. W. (1995). Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County’s drug court. Justice System Journal, 18, 55–73.Google Scholar
  3. Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy Experiment: an assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 468–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feder, L., & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: the Broward experiment. Justice Quarterly, 19, 343–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford, D. A., & Regoli, M. J. (1993). Indianapolis domestic violence prosecution experiment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  6. Gottfredson, D. C., Najaka, S. S., & Kearly, B. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Lee, P. A., Schepise, M. M., Hazzard, J. E. R., Merrill, J. C., et al. (2003). Are judicial status hearings a key component of drug court? During-treatment data from a randomized trial. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (1998). Restorative policing experiment: the Bethlehem Pennsylvania police family group conferencing project. Pipersville, PA: Community Service Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. McGarrell, E., Olivares, K., Crawford, K., & Kroovand, N. (2000). Returning justice to the community: the Indianapolis restorative justice experiment. Indianapolis: Hudson Institute Crime Control Policy Center.Google Scholar
  10. Rosenberg, M. (1964). The pretrial conference and effective justice: a controlled test in personal injury litigation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Schneider, A. L. (1986). Restitution and recidivism rates of juvenile offenders: results from four experimental studies. Criminology, 24, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stapleton, W. V., & Teitelbaum, L. E. (1972). In defense of youth: a study of the role of counsel in American juvenile courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Corrections

  1. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1975). Residential treatment and its effect on delinquency. Home Office Research Study No. 32. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  2. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27, 261–278.Google Scholar
  3. Jesness, C. F. (1975). Comparative effectiveness of behavior modification and transactional analysis programs for delinquents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychiatry, 43, 758–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kassebaum, G., Ward, D., & Wilner, D. (1971). Prison treatment and parole survival. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Marques, J. K., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & West, M. A. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offender recidivism: preliminary results from a longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Peters, M., Thomas, D., & Zamberlan, C. (1997). Boot camps for juvenile offenders. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  7. Robinson, D. (1995). The impact of cognitive skills training on post-release recidivism among Canadian federal offenders. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Sarason, I. G., & Ganzer, V. J. (1973). Modeling and group discussion in the rehabilitation of juvenile delinquents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20, 442–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. Prison Journal, 79, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Community

  1. Berk, R. A., Lenihan, K. J., & Rossi, P. H. (1980). Crime and poverty: some experimental evidence from ex-offenders. American Sociological Review, 45, 766–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cave, G., Doolittle, F., Bos, H., & Toussaint, C. (1993). JOBSTART: final report on a program for high school dropouts. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corp.Google Scholar
  3. Ditman, K. S., Crawford, G. G., Forgy, E. W., Moskowitz, H., & MacAndrew, C. (1967). A controlled experiment on the use of court probation for drunk arrests. American Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 160–163.Google Scholar
  4. Empey, L. T., & Lubeck, S. G. (1971). The Silverlake experiment: testing delinquency theory and community intervention. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  5. Empey, L. T., & Erickson, M. L. (1972). The Provo experiment: evaluating community control of delinquency. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Fagan, J. A. (1990). Treatment and reintegration of violent juvenile offenders: experimental results. Justice Quarterly, 7, 233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Katz, L. F., Kling, J. R., & Liebman, J. B. (2001). Moving to opportunity in Boston: early impacts of a randomized mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 607–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kling, J. R., Ludwig, J., & Katz, L. F. (2005). Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 87–130.Google Scholar
  9. Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., & Hirschfield, P. (2001). Urban poverty and juvenile crime: evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 655–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McAuliffe, W. E. (1990). A randomized controlled trial of recovery training and self-help for opioid addicts in New England and Hong Kong. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 22, 197–209.Google Scholar
  11. McCord, J. (1978). A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. American Psychologist, 33, 284–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCord, J. (1992). The Cambridge-Somerville study: a pioneering longitudinal experimental study of delinquency prevention. In J. McCord & R. E. Trembley (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 196–208). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  13. Palmer, T. (1974). The Youth Authority’s community treatment program. Federal Probation, 38, 3–13.Google Scholar
  14. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole: results of a nationwide experiment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  15. Powers, E., & Witmer, H. (1951). An experiment in the prevention of delinquency: the Cambridge-Somerville Youth Study. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Quay, H. C., & Love, C. T. (1977). The effect of a juvenile diversion program on rearrests. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rhodes, W., & Gross, M. (1997). Case management reduces drug use and criminality among drug-involved arrestees: An experimental study of an HIV prevention intervention. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  18. Rossi, P. H., Berk, R. A., & Lenihan, K. J. (1980). Money, work, and crime: Experimental evidence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schwartz, R. D., & Orleans, S. (1967). On legal sanctions. University of Chicago Law Review, 34, 274–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Swanson, J. W., Borum, R., Swartz, M. S., Hiday, V. A., Wagner, H. R., & Burns, B. J. (2001). Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce arrests among persons with severe mental illness? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 156–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Voorhis, P., Spruance, L. M., Ritchey, P. N., Listwan, S. J., & Seabrook, R. (2004). The Georgia cognitive skills experiment: a replication of Reasoning and Rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 282–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schools

  1. Bierman, K. L., Miller, C. L., & Stabb, S. D. (1987). Improving the social behavior and peer acceptance of rejected boys: effects of social skill training with instructions and prohibitions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1106–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coie, J. D., & Krehbiel, G. (1984). Effects of academic tutoring on the social status of low-achieving, socially rejected children. Child Development, 55, 1465–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellickson, P. L., & Bell, R. M. (1990). Drug prevention in junior high: a multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247, 1299–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M., & McGuigan, K. (1993). Preventing adolescent drug use: long-term results of a junior high program. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 856–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R. W., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foshee, V. A., Linder, G. F., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J. L., et al. (1996). The Safe Dates project: theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 39–47.Google Scholar
  8. Gottfredson, D. C. (1986). An empirical test of school-based environmental and individual interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior. Criminology, 24, 705–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gottfredson, D. C. (1990). Changing school structures to benefit high-risk youths. In P. E. Leone (Ed.), Understanding troubled and troubling youth (pp. 246–271). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, J. W., Johnson, C. A., Hansen, W. B., Flay, B. R., & Gee, M. (1990). Drug use prevention programs, gender, and ethnicity: evaluation of three seventh-grade Project SMART cohorts. Preventive Medicine, 19, 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, W. B., Johnson, C. A., Flay, B. R., Graham, J. W., & Sobel, J. (1988). Affective and social influences approaches to the prevention of multiple substance abuse among seventh grade students: results from Project SMART. Preventive Medicine, 17, 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hudley, C. A. (1994). The reduction of childhood aggression using the BrainPower Program. In M. Furlong & D. Smith (Eds.), Anger, hostility, and aggression: assessment, prevention, and intervention strategies for youth (pp. 313–344). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Mayer, G. R., Butterworth, T. W., Nafpaktitis, M., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1983). Preventing school vandalism and improving discipline: a three-year study. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCord, J., Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., & Desmarais-Gervais, L. (1994). Boys’ disruptive behaviour, school adjustment, and delinquency: the Montreal prevention experiment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 739–752.Google Scholar
  15. Meyer, H. J., Borgatta, E. F., & Jones, W. C. (1965). Girls at vocational high: an experiment in social work intervention. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Reckless, W. C., & Dinitz, S. (1972). The prevention of juvenile delinquency: an experiment. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Tremblay, R. E., McCord, J., Boileau, H., Charlebois, P., Gagnon, C., LeBlanc, M., et al. (1991). Can disruptive boys be helped to become competent? Psychiatry, 54, 148–161.Google Scholar
  18. Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., Bertrand, L., LeBlanc, M., Beauchesne, H., Boileau, H., et al. (1992). Parent and child training to prevent early onset of delinquency: the Montreal Longitudinal-Experiment Study. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 117–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tremblay, R. E., Pagani-Kurtz, L., Vitaro, F., Mâsse, L. C., & Pihl, R. O. (1995). A bimodal preventive intervention for disruptive kindergarten boys: its impact through mid-adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Walker, H. M., Kavanagh, K., Stiller, B., Golly, A., Severson, H. H., & Feil, E. (1998). First step to success: an early intervention approach for preventing school antisocial behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6, 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Early Prevention

  1. Achenbach, T. M., Phares, V., Howell, C. T., Rauh, V. A., & Nurcombe, B. (1990). Seven-year outcome of the Vermont intervention program for low-birthweight infants. Child Development, 61, 1672–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berrueta-Clement, J. R., Schweinhart, L. J., Barnett, W. S., Epstein, A. S., & Weiker, D. P. (1984). Changed lives: the effects of the Perry preschool program on youths through age 19. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.Google Scholar
  3. Borduin, C. M., Mann, B. J., Cone, L. T., Henggeler, S. W., Fucci, B. R., Blaske, D. M., et al. (1995). Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: long-term prevention of criminality and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: young adult outcomes from the Abercedarian project. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray, J. D., Cutler, C. A., Dean, J. G., & Kempe, C. H. (1979). Prediction and prevention of child-abuse and neglect. Journal of Social Issues, 35, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gutelius, M. F., Kirsch, A. D., MacDonald, S. B., Brooks, M., & McErlean, T. (1977). Controlled study of child health supervision: behavioural results. Pediatrics, 60, 294–307.Google Scholar
  8. Harrell, A. V., Cavanagh, S. E., & Sridharan, S. (1999). Evaluation of the children at risk program: results 1 year after the end of the program. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  9. Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Brondino, M. J., & Schere, D. G. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: the role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henggeler, S. W., Clingempeel, W. G., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2002). Four-year follow-up of multisystemic therapy with substance-abusing and substance-dependent juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 868–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henggeler, S. W., Rowland, M. D., Randall, J., Ward, D. W., Pickrel, S. G., Cunningham, P. B., et al. (1999). Home-based multisystemic therapy as an alternative to the hospitalization of youths in psychiatric crisis: clinical outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1331–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobson, S. W., & Frye, K. F. (1991). Effect of maternal social support on attachment: experimental evidence. Child Development, 62, 572–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, D. L., & Walker, T. (1987). Primary prevention of behavior problems in Mexican-American children. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leschied, A., & Cunningham, A. (2002). Seeking effective interventions for serious young offenders: interim results of a four-year randomized study of multisystemic therapy in Ontario, Canada. London, Canada: London Family Court Clinic.Google Scholar
  15. Lieberman, A. F., Weston, D. R., & Paul, J. H. (1991). Preventive intervention and outcome with anxiously attached dyads. Child Development, 62, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Chamberlin, R., & Tatelbaum, R. (1986). Preventing child abuse and neglect: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics, 78, 65–78.Google Scholar
  17. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Tatelbaum, R., & Chamberlin, R. (1988). Improving the life-course development of socially disadvantaged mothers: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 1436–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Cole, R., Eckenrode, J., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D., et al. (1998). Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children’s criminal and antisocial behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1238–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tierney, J. P., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, N. L. (1995). Making a difference: an impact study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  20. Tremblay, R. E., Masse, L. C., Pagani, L., & Vitaro, F. (1996). From childhood physical aggression to adolescent maladjustment: the Montreal prevention experiment. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahan (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance use and delinquency (pp. 268–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Zongping, X., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime effects: the High/Scope Perry preschool study through age 40. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.Google Scholar
  22. Seitz, V., Rosenbaum, L. K., & Apfel, N. H. (1985). Effects of family support intervention: a ten-year follow-up. Child Development, 56, 376–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wasik, B. H., Ramey, C. T., Bryant, D. M., & Sparling, J. J. (1990). A longitudinal study of two early intervention strategies: Project CARE. Child Development, 61, 1682–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Administration of Justice DepartmentGeorge Mason UniversityManassasUSA

Personalised recommendations