Ensuring safety, implementation and scientific integrity of clinical trials: lessons from the Criminal Justice–Drug Abuse Treatment Studies Data and Safety Monitoring Board
- 90 Downloads
Data and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) provide independent oversight to bio-medical clinical trials, ensuring safe and ethical treatment of research participants, data quality, and credibility of study findings. Recently, the type of research monitored by DSMBs has been expanded to include randomized clinical trials of behavioral and psychosocial interventions in community and justice based settings. This paper focuses on the development and role of a DSMB created by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to monitor six multi-site clinical trials conducted within the Criminal Justice–Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS). We believe this is one of the first such applications of formal DSMBs in justice settings. Special attention is given to developing processes for measuring and monitoring a range of implementation issues for research conducted within criminal justice settings. Lessons learned and recommendations to enhance future DSMB work within this area are discussed.
KeywordsClinical trial CJ-DATS Criminal justice DSMB Health services research
- Dennis, M. L., Perl, H. I., Huebner, R. B., & McLellan, A. T. (2000). Twenty-five strategies for improving the design, implementation and analysis of health services research related to alcohol and other drug abuse treatment. Addiction, 95 (Suppl. 3), S281–S308.Google Scholar
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blas, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: National Implementation Research Network.Google Scholar
- Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 1(2). Retrieved on 17 April 2008 from http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2288-1-2.pdf.
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2004). Division of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Research (DESPR) data and safety monitoring board standard operating procedures. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Retrieved on 21 May 2008 from http://cjdats.org/content_documents/DSMB%20SOP%20Revised%20June’04_%20final%20agr.pdf.Google Scholar
- National Institutes of Health. (2000). Further guidance on a data and safety monitoring for phase I and phase II trials. Notice: OD-00-038. Retrieved on 21 May 2008 from http://grants.Nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-oo-038.html.
- Prendergast, M., Cartier, J., & Hall, E. (2005). CJDATS brief report: Transitional case management (TCM). Retrieved 28 April 2009, http://cjdats.org/ka/ka-3.cfm?content_item_id=343.
- Sholomskas, D. E., Syracuse-Stewart, G., Rounsaville, B. J., Ball, S. A., Nuro, K. F., & Carroll, K. M. (2005). We don’t train in vain: a dissemination trial of three strategies of training clinicians in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(1), 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar