Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 437–458 | Cite as

Does neighborhood watch reduce crime? A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Trevor BennettEmail author
  • Katy Holloway
  • David P. Farrington
Systematic review


Neighborhood watch grew out of a movement in the USA during the late 1960s that promoted greater involvement of citizens in the prevention of crime. Recent estimates suggest that over a quarter of the UK population and over 40% of the US population live in areas covered by neighborhood watch schemes. The current paper presents the results of a recent systematic review of evaluations of neighborhood watch. The main findings of the narrative review were that about half of the schemes evaluated showed that neighborhood watch was effective in reducing crime, with most of the other evaluations having uncertain effects. The main findings of the meta-analysis were that 15 of the 18 studies provided evidence that neighborhood watch reduced crime. While the results of the review are encouraging, it was concluded that more high-quality research needs to be done to help explain why study variations exist.

Key words

crime reduction effectiveness meta-analysis neighborhood watch systematic review 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, T. H. & Wright, R. (1984). Burglars on burglary: Prevention and the offender. Aldershot, U.K.: Gower.Google Scholar
  2. Greenberg, S. W., Rohe, W. M. & Williams, J. R. (1985). Informal citizen action and crime prevention at the neighborhood level. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  3. Laycock, G. (1985). Property marking: A deterrent to domestic burglary? Crime Prevention Unit Paper 3. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  4. Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. National Crime Prevention Council (2001). The 2000 National Crime Prevention Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Crime Prevention Council.Google Scholar
  6. Rosenbaum, D. P. (1987). The theory and research behind neighborhood watch: Is it a sound fear and crime reduction strategy? Crime and Delinquency 33, 103–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sherman, L. W. (1997). Policing for crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. C. Gottfredson, D. L. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising (pp. 8-1–8-58). Washington, D.C.: US Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  8. Sims, L. (2001). Neighborhood watch: Findings from the 2000 British Crime Survey. (Research Findings 150.) London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  9. Titus, R. (1984). Residential burglary and the community response. In R. V. G. Clarke & T. Hope (Eds.), Coping with burglary (pp. 97–130). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Turner, B. W. M. & Barker, P. J. (1983). Study tour of the United States of America: 7th March 1983 to 21st March 1983. London: Metropolitan Police.Google Scholar
  11. Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O. & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006) A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology (in press).Google Scholar

Studies included in the review

  1. Anderton, K. J. (1985). The effectiveness of Home Watch schemes in Cheshire. Chester, UK: Cheshire Constabulary.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, T. H. (1990). Evaluating neighbourhood watch. Cambridge Studies in Criminology LXI. Aldershot, UK: Gower.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, S. F. & Lavrakas, P. J. (1989). Community-based crime prevention: An assessment of the Eisenhower Foundation’s neighborhood program. Crime and Delinquency 35, 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cirel, P., Evans, P., McGillis, D. & Whitcomb, D. (1977). Community Crime Prevention Program, Seattle: an exemplary project. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  5. Forrester, D., Chatterton, M., & Pease, K. (1988) The Kirkholt Prevention Project, Rochdale. Crime Prevention Unit, Paper 13. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  6. Forrester, D., Frenz, S., O’Connell, M. & Pease, K. (1990). The Kirkholt Burglary Prevention Project: Phase II. Crime Prevention Unit, Paper 23. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  7. Henig, J. R. (1984). Citizens against crime: An assessment of the neighborhood watch program in Washington, D.C. (Occasional Paper, Center for Washington Area Studies.) Washington: George Washington University.Google Scholar
  8. Hulin, J. O. (1979). Community-based crime prevention project. Crime Prevention Review 6, 26–34.Google Scholar
  9. Husain, S. (1990). Neighborhood watch and crime: An assessment of impact. London: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Jenkins, A. D. & Latimer, I. (1986). Evaluation of Merseyside homewatch scheme. Management development and force planning unit. Liverpool, UK: Merseyside Police.Google Scholar
  11. Knowles, L., Lesser, C. & McKewen, F. (1983). Burglary prevention: A citizen initiated and operated neighborhood watch program. The Police Chief 50, 36–38.Google Scholar
  12. Latessa, E. J. & Travis, L. F. (1987) Citizen crime prevention: problems and prospectives in reducing crime. Journal of Security Administration, 10(1): 38–51.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, D. A., Grant, J. A. & Rosenbaum, D. P. (1988). Social construction of reform: Crime prevention and community organizations. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  14. Lowman, J. (1983). Target hardening burglary prevention and the problem of displacement phenomena. In T. Fleming (Ed.), Deviant designations: Crime, law and deviance in Canada (pp. 277–304). Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  15. Matthews, R. & Trickey, J. (1994a). Eyres Monsell crime reduction project. Leicester, U.K.: University of Leicester, Centre for the Study of Public Order.Google Scholar
  16. Matthews, R. & Trickey, J. (1994b). The New Parks crime reduction project. Leicester, U.K.: Centre for the Study of Public Order, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  17. Mukherjee, S. & Wilson, P. (1988). Neighborhood watch: Issues and policy implications. (Trends and Issues No. 8.) Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  18. Research & Forecasts Inc. (1983). The Figgie Report, Part IV: reducing crime in America - successful community efforts. Willoughby, Ohio: Figgie International.Google Scholar
  19. Sherman, L. W. & Eck, J. (2002). Policing for crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington, B. C. Welsh & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 295–329). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Tilley, N. & Webb, J. (1994). Burglary reduction: Findings from the safer cities scheme. (Crime Prevention Unit Paper 51.) London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  21. Veater, P. (1984). Evaluation of Kingsdown neighborhood watch project, Bristol. Bristol, U.K.: Avon and Somerset Constabulary.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trevor Bennett
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katy Holloway
    • 2
  • David P. Farrington
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for CriminologyUniversity of GlamorganPontypriddUK
  2. 2.Centre for CriminologyUniversity of GlamorganPontypriddUK
  3. 3.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations