Ecological Research

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1001–1009 | Cite as

Effect of manipulating animal stocking rate on the carbon storage capacity in a degraded desert steppe

  • Zhongwu Wang
  • Guodong Han
  • Xiying Hao
  • Mengli Zhao
  • Haijun Ding
  • Zhiguo Li
  • Jing Wang
  • Alistair Hamilton
  • Yongzhi Liu
  • Lata A
  • Baoyin Hexige
Original Article


Managing the stocking rate is considered one of the most important practices influencing carbon storage on rangeland. The effects of four stocking rates consisting of a non-grazed control (CK), light (0.15 sheep ha−1 month−1), moderate (0.30 sheep ha−1 month−1) and heavy (0.45 sheep ha−1 month−1) were evaluated for impacts on carbon storage taking place on the Desert Steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Carbon storage was measure in aboveground vegetation, roots and soil in August of 2009, 2011 and 2013. Both aboveground biomass (AGB) and below-ground biomass (BGB) increased significantly as stocking rate decreased. Stocking rate also had a significant effect on both the aboveground and below-ground carbon storage in plant biomass, but had no effect on the soil carbon. Compared to the heavy stocking rate typically practiced by local herders, lower stocking rates increased the total above- and below-ground biomass carbon storage by ≥ 7%. Over the 3 year study, compared to the moderate stocking rate, the rate of carbon sequestration with a light stocking rate was 0.7 Mg C ha−1 year−1. Thus, reducing stocking rate has the potential to increase C sequestration and storage, as well as maintaining animal numbers at a more sustainable level suitable for the Desert Steppe ecosystem.


Carbon sequestration Global change Range management Sheep grazing 



This study was supported by Excellent Young Scientist Foundation of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University of China (2014XYQ-7), National Nature Science Foundation of China (31260124, 31560140, 31270502, 31760143), Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources Ministry of Education People’s Republic of China and Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture, Innovation Research Team of Ministry of Education (IRT17R59), also supported by West Light Foundation of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors are thankful for kindly checking English and the helpful suggestions provided by Walter D. Willms and Dean M. Anderson. The authors would like to thank all students of IMAU for their efforts in collecting and analyzing field samples and all staff members of Siziwang Grassland Research Station for their help in our study, and very grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11284_2017_1516_MOESM1_ESM.docx (89 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 88 kb)


  1. Allen-Diaz B (1996) Rangelands in a changing climate: impacts, adaptations and mitigation. In: Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH (eds) Climate change 1995. Impacts, adaptations, and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Published for the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, pp 131–158Google Scholar
  2. Anderson DM, Estell RE, Holechek JL, Ivey S, Smith GB (2014) Virtual herding for flexible livestock management—a review. Rangel J 36:205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atjay GL, Ketner P, Duvigeaud P (1979) Terrestrial primary production and phytomass. In: Bolin B, Degens ET, Kempe S et al (eds) The global carbon cycle SCOPE 13. Wiley, Chichester, pp 129–182Google Scholar
  4. Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer A, Cole CV, Black AL (1987) Soil property comparisons in virgin grasslands between grazed and nongrazed management systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown J, Angerer J, Salley SW, Blaisdell R, Stuth JW (2010) Improving estimates of rangeland carbon sequestration potential in the US Southwest. Rangel Ecol Manage 63:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cahill KN, Kucharik CJ, Foley JA (2009) Prairie restoration and carbon sequestration: difficulties quantifying C sources and sinks using a biometrie approach. Ecol Appl 19:2185–2201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Conant R, Paustian K (2002) Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 16:1143. doi: 10.1029/2001GB001661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conant RT, Paustian K, Elliott ET (2001) Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol Appl 11:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derner JD, Schuman GE (2007) Carbon sequestration and rangelands: a synthesis of land management and precipitation effects. J Soil Water Conserv 62:77–85Google Scholar
  11. Derner JD, Beriske DD, Boutton TW (1997) Does grazing mediate soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation beneath C4, perennial grasses along an environmental gradient? Plant Soil 191:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dormaar JF, Johnston A, Smoliak S (1977) Seasonal variations in chemical characteristics of soil organic matter of grazed and ungrazed mixed prairie and fescue grassland. J Range Manag 30:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drewry JJ, Lowe JAH, Paton RJ (1999) Effect of sheep stocking intensity on soil physical properties and dry matter production on a Pallic Soil in Southland. N Z J Agric Res 42:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eswaran H, Van den Berg E, Reich P, Kimble J (1995) Global soil carbon resources, in Global change. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 27–43Google Scholar
  15. Fan J, Zhong H, Harris W, Yu G, Wang S, Hu Z, Yue Y (2008) Carbon storage in the grasslands of China based on field measurements of above- and below-ground biomass. Clim Change 86:375–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank AB, Tanaka DL, Hofmann L, Follett RF (1995) Soil carbon and nitrogen of Northern Great Plains grasslands as influenced by long-term grazing. J Range Manag 48:470–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao YZ, Giese M, Lin S, Sattelmacher B, Zhao Y, Brueck H (2008) Belowground net primary productivity and biomass allocation of a grassland in Inner Mongolia is affected by grazing intensity. Plant Soil 307:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilmanov TG, Aires L, Barcza Z, Baron VS, Belelli L, Beringer J, Billesbach D, Bonal D, Bradford J, Ceschia E, Cook D, Corradi C, Frank A, Gianelle D, Gimeno C, Gruenwald T, Guo H, Hanan N, Haszpra L, Heilman J, Jacobs A, Jones MB, Johnson DA, Kiely G, Li S, Magliulo V, Moors E, Nagy Z, Nasyrov M, Owensby C, Pinter K, Pio C, Reichstein M, Sanz MJ, Scott R, Soussana JF, Stoy PC, Svejcar T, Tuba Z, Zhou G (2010) Productivity, respiration, and light-response parameters of world grassland and agro ecosystems derived from flux-tower measurements. Rangel Ecol Manag 63:16–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holechek JL, Pieper RD, Herel CH (2004) Range management: principles and practices, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 607Google Scholar
  20. Holland EA, Parton WJ, Detling JK, Coppock DL (1992) Physiological responses of plant populations to herbivory and their consequences for ecosystem nutrient flow. Am Nat 140:685–706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Houghton RA (1995) Effects of land-use change, surface temperature, and CO2 concentration on terrestrial stores of carbon. In: Woodwell GM, Mackenzie FT (eds) Biotic feedbacks in the global climatic system: will warming feed warming?. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 333–350Google Scholar
  22. Johnston A, Dormaar JF, Smoliak S (1971) Long-term grazing effects on fescue grassland soils. J Range Manag 24:185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones MB, Donnelly A (2004) Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO2. New Phytol 164:423–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milchunas DG, Laurenroth WK (1993) Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol Monogr 63:327–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ni J (2001) Carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China: estimates at different spatial resolutions and their responses to climate change. Clim Change 49:339–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paruelo JM, Piñeiro G, Baldi G, Baeza S, Lezama F, Altesor A, Oesterbeld M (2010) Carbon stocks and fluxes in rangelands of the Río de la Plata Basin. Rangel Ecol Manag 63:94–108. doi: 10.2111/08-055.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reeder JD, Schuman GE (2002) Influence of livestock grazing on C sequestration in semi-arid mixed-grass and short-grass rangelands. Environ Pollut 116:457–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schimel DS (1995) Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Glob Change Biol 1:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schuman GE, Reeder JD, Manley JT, Hart RH, Manley WA (1999) Impact of grazing management on the carbon and nitrogen balance of a mixed-grass rangeland. Ecol Appl 9:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schuman GE, Janzen HH, Herrick JE (2002) Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands. Environ Pollut 116:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sims PL, Bradford JA (2001) Carbon dioxide fluxes in a southern plains prairie. Agric For Meteorol 109:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smoliak S, Dormaar JF, Johnston A (1972) Long-term grazing effects on Stipa-Bouteloua prairie soils. J Range Manag 25:246–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang ZW, Jiao SY, Han GD, Zhao ML, Willms WD, Hao XY, Wang JA, Ding HJ, Havstad KM (2011) Impact of stocking rate and rainfall on sheep performance in a desert steppe. Rangel Ecol Manag 64:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang ZW, Jiao SY, Han GD, Zhao ML, Ding HJ, Zhang XJ, Wang XL, Ayers EL, Willms WD, Havsatad K, Lata A, Liu YZ (2014) Effects of stocking rate on the variability of peak standing crop in a desert steppe of Eurasia Grassland. Environ Manag 53:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang H, Dong ZB, Guo J, Li H, Li J, Han G, Chen X (2017) Effects of grazing intensity on organic carbon stock characteristics in Stipa breviflora desert steppe vegetation soil systems. Rangel J. doi: 10.1071/RJ16007 Google Scholar
  36. White RS, Murray S, Rohweder M (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: grassland ecosystems technical report. World Resources Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang G, Kang Y, Han G, Hong M, Sakurai K (2011) Grassland degradation reduces the carbon sequestration capacity of the vegetation and enhances the soil carbon and nitrogen loss. Acta Agric Scand B Sect Plant 61:356–364Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Grassland Science, College of Ecology and Environmental ScienceInner Mongolia Agricultural UniversityHohhotPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Lethbridge Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaLethbridgeCanada
  3. 3.Environment and Countryside DepartmentSRUCEdinburghScotland, UK
  4. 4.Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry SciencesHohhotPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations