Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 191–195 | Cite as

Natural licks are required for large terrestrial mammals in a degraded riparian forest, Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia

  • Ikki MatsudaEmail author
  • Marc Ancrenaz
  • Yoshihiro Akiyama
  • Augustine Tuuga
  • Noreen Majalap
  • Henry Bernard
Note and Comment

Abstract

Although the importance of natural licks for terrestrial mammals is widely acknowledged, we report here for the first time its importance for large terrestrial mammals in a degraded riverine forest in Borneo. Our results clearly demonstrated that various mammals, including bearded pig, sambar deer, and endangered orang-utans, were using the natural lick, though large arboreal/avian herbivore/omnivore animals were not attracted to the natural lick. In addition, the diversity of mammal species recorded in this study was lower than those recorded in the dry lowland forest. Possible reasons for this difference between the different forest types are discussed.

Keywords

Bearded pig Camera-trap Mineral Orang-utan Sambar deer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Economic Planning Unit of the Malaysian Government, the Sabah Biodiversity Centre, the Sabah Wildlife Department, the Sabah Forestry Department staff, and our research assistants (Asnih, Shah, and Hartiman) in Sabah, Malaysia, for support. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments. This study was partly financed by the HOPE and Human Evolution Project from KUPRI, the National Geographic Society (#9254-13, US) to IM, Nagao Environmental Foundation Japan to HB and Grants-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (#24657170, JP) to IM, for Young Scientist (#26711027 & #21770261, JP) to IM, Scientific Research (#25291100, JP) to G. Hanya, and for Strategic Young Researcher Overseas Visits Program for Accelerating Brain Circulation to KUPRI, from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and was conducted in compliance with animal care regulations and applicable Malaysian laws. Lastly, the authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Supplementary material

11284_2014_1219_MOESM1_ESM.doc (94 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 93 kb)

References

  1. Abram NK, Xofis P, Tzanopoulos J, MacMillan DC, Ancrenaz M, Chung R, Peter L, Ong R, Lackman I, Goossens B, Ambu L, Knight AT (2014) Synergies for Improving Oil Palm Production and Forest Conservation in Floodplain Landscapes. PLoS One 9:e95388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095388 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ancrenaz M, Goossens B, Gimenez O, Sawang A, Lackman-Ancrenaz I (2004) Determination of ape distribution and population size using ground and aerial surveys: a case study with orang-utans in lower Kinabatangan, Sabah, Malaysia. Anim Conserv 7:375–385. doi: 10.1017/s136794300400157x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ancrenaz M, Gimenez O, Ambu L, Ancrenaz K, Andau P, Goossens B, Payne J, Sawang A, Tuuga A, Lackman-Ancrenaz I (2005) Aerial surveys give new estimates for orangutans in Sabah, Malaysia. PLoS Biol 3:e3. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030003 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ancrenaz M, Hearn AJ, Ross J, Sollmann R, Wilting A (2012) Handbook for wildlife monitoring using camera-traps. BBEC Publications, Kota KinabaluGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayotte JB, Parker KL, Gillingham MP (2008) Use of Natural Licks by Four Species of Ungulates in Northern British Columbia. J Mammal 89:1041–1050. doi: 10.1644/07-mamm-a-345.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brightsmith DJ, Munoz-Najar RA (2004) Avian Geophagy and Soil Characteristics in Southeastern Peru. Biotropica 36:534–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2004.tb00348.x Google Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, VerlagGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ (2002) Foraging challenges of red colobus monkeys: influence of nutrients and secondary compounds. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 133:861–875. doi: 10.1016/s1095-6433(02)00209-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emmons LH, Stark NM (1979) Elemental composition of a natural mineral lick in Amazonia. Biotropica 11:311–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goossens B, Setchell JM, Abulani DMA, Jalil MF, James SS, Aris SH, Lakim MH, Seventri AD, Sariningsih SS, Ancrenaz M (2002) A boat survey of primates in the lower Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary. In: Mohamed M, Takano A, Goossens B, Indran R (eds) Lower Kinabatangan scientific expedition. Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, pp 37–45Google Scholar
  11. Holdø RM, Dudley JP, McDowell LR (2002) Geophagy in the African elephant in relation to availability of dietary sodium. J Mammal 83:652–664. doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083%3C0652:GITAEI%3E2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klaus G, Klaus-Hügi C, Schmid B (1998) Geophagy by large mammals at natural licks in the rain forest of the Dzanga National Park, Central African Republic. J Trop Ecol 14:829–839. doi: 10.1017/s0266467498000595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krishnamani R, Mahaney WC (2000) Geophagy among primates: adaptive significance and ecological consequences. Anim Behav 59:899–915. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1376 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matsubayashi H, Lagan P, Majalap N, Tangah J, Sukor JRA, Kitayama K (2007a) Importance of natural licks for the mammals in Bornean inland tropical rain forests. Ecol Res 22:742–748. doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0313-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsubayashi H, Lagan P, Sukor JRA, Kitayama K (2007b) Seasonal and daily use of natural licks by sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) in a Bornean tropical rain forest. Tropics 17:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matsubayashi H, Ahmad AH, Wakamatsu N, Nakazono E, Takyu M, Majalap N, Lagan P, Sukor JRA (2011) Natural-licks use by orangutans and conservation of their habitats in Bornean tropical production forest. Raffles Bull Zool 59:109–115Google Scholar
  17. Matsuda I, Tuuga A, Higashi S (2009) Ranging Behavior of Proboscis Monkeys in a Riverine Forest with Special Reference to Ranging in Inland Forest. Int J Primatol 30:313–325. doi: 10.1007/s10764-009-9344-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsuda I, Tuuga A, Bernard H, Sugau J, Hanya G (2013) Leaf selection by two Bornean colobine monkeys in relation to plant chemistry and abundance. Sci Rep 3:1873. doi: 10.1038/srep01873 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Payne J, Davies G (1987) A faunal survey of Sabah IUCN/WWF Malaysia project 1692. IUCN/WWF Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, p 279Google Scholar
  20. Payne J, Davies G (2013) Conservation of Rain Forest Mammals in Sabah: long Term Perspectives. Raffles Bull Zool 29:187–201Google Scholar
  21. Pielou EC (1966) Shannon’s formula as a measure of specific diversity: its use and misuses. Am Nat 104:463–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ping X, Li C, Jiang Z, Liu W, Zhu H (2011) Sexual difference in seasonal patterns of salt lick use by south China sika deer Cervus nippon. Mamm Biol (Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde) 76:196–200. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2010.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ikki Matsuda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marc Ancrenaz
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yoshihiro Akiyama
    • 4
  • Augustine Tuuga
    • 3
  • Noreen Majalap
    • 5
  • Henry Bernard
    • 6
  1. 1.Primate Research InstituteKyoto UniversityInuyamaJapan
  2. 2.Kinabatangan Orang-utan Conservation ProjectSandakanMalaysia
  3. 3.Sabah Wildlife DepartmentKota KinabaluMalaysia
  4. 4.Coastal, Marine and Disaster Prevention Department, National Institute for Land and Infrastructure ManagementMinistry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and TourismKanagawaJapan
  5. 5.Sabah Forestry DepartmentSabah Forest Research CentreKota KinabaluMalaysia
  6. 6.Institute for Tropical Biology and ConservationUniversiti Malaysia SabahKota KinabaluMalaysia

Personalised recommendations