Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 483–491 | Cite as

Application of random forest algorithm for studying habitat selection of colonial herons and egrets in human-influenced landscapes

  • Luis Carrasco
  • Miyuki Mashiko
  • Yukihiko Toquenaga
Original Article

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of habitat selection is fundamental to the construction of proper conservation and management plans for many avian species. Habitat changes caused by human beings increase the landscape complexity and thus the complexity of data available for explaining species distribution. New techniques that assume no linearity and capable to extrapolate the response variables across landscapes are needed for dealing with difficult relationships between habitat variables and distribution data. We used a random forest algorithm to study breeding-site selection of herons and egrets in a human-influenced landscape by analyzing land use around their colonies. We analyzed the importance of each land-use variable for different scales and its relationship to the probability of colony presence. We found that there exist two main spatial scales on which herons and egrets select their colony sites: medium scale (4 km) and large scale (10–15 km). Colonies were attracted to areas with large amounts of evergreen forests at the medium scale, whereas avoidance of high-density urban areas was important at the large scale. Previous studies used attractive factors, mainly foraging areas, to explain bird-colony distributions, but our study is the first to show the major importance of repellent factors at large scales. We believe that the newest non-linear methods, such as random forests, are needed when modelling complex variable interactions when organisms are distributed in complex landscapes. These methods could help to improve the conservation plans of those species threatened by the advance of highly human-influenced landscapes.

Keywords

Breeding-site selection Colonial birds Habitat selection Landscape ecology Predictive models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Ikeno, M. Seido, and K. Takeda for supplying information about the location of some colonies. We also thank K. Ohashi and members of the Population Ecology laboratory for helpful discussions. This study was supported in part by Grant-in-Aids for Scientific Research (13740433 and 19570014) to YT from the MEXT and JSPS. Additional financial support was provided through a Monbukagakusho scholarship to L. Carrasco from MEXT.

References

  1. Battin J, Lawler JJ (2006) Cross-scale correlations and the design and analysis of avian habitat selection studies. Condor 108:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boisteau B, Marion L (2007) Habitat use by the grey heron (Ardea cinerea) in eastern France. CR Biol 330:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140Google Scholar
  4. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  6. Bustamante J (1997) Predictive models for lesser krestel Falco naumanni distribution, abundance and extintion in southern Spain. Biol Conserv 80:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Environmental Agency of Japan (1994) Distribution and population status of colonies and communal roosts of 22 bird species from 1990 to 1992. Wild Bird Society of Japan and the Environmental Agency of Japan, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  9. Fasola M, Alieri R (1992) Conservation of heronry Ardeidae sites in North Italian agricultural landscapes. Biol Conserv 62:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fasola M, Canova L (1991) Colony site selection by eight species of gulls and terns breeding in the ≪Valli di Comacchio≫ (Italy). Italian J Zool 658:261–266Google Scholar
  11. Friedman J (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuller RJ (2012) Birds and habitat: relationships in changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbs J, Kinkel L (1997) Determinants of the size and location of great blue heron colonies. Colonial Waterbirds 20:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill F (2007) Ornithology. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J, Franklin J (2005) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Math Intell 27:83–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinänen S, Rönkä M, Numers MV (2008) Modelling the occurrence and abundance of a colonial species, the arctic tern Sterna paradisaea in the archipelago of SW Finland. Ecography 31:601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hijmans RJ, van Etten J (2012) Raster: geographic analysis and modeling with raster data. R package version 2.1-25Google Scholar
  18. Keating K, Cherry S (2004) Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat selection studies. J Wild Manag 68:774–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly J, Stralberg D, Etienne K, McCaustland M (2008) Landscape influence on the quality of heron and egret colony sites. Wetlands 28:257–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lane S, Fujioka M (1998) The impact of changes in irrigation practices on the distribution of foraging egrets and herons (Ardeidae) in the rice fields of central Japan. Biol Conserv 83:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lauver CL, Busby WH, Whistler JL (2002) Testing a GIS model of habitat suitability for a declining grassland bird. Environ Manag 30:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22Google Scholar
  23. Mashiko M, Toquenaga Y (2013) Increasing variation in population size and species composition ratio in mixed-species heron colonies in Japan. Forktail 29:71–77Google Scholar
  24. Myrtveit I, Stensrud E, Shepperd M (2005) Reliability and validity in comparative studies of software prediction models. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 31:380–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Narusue M (1992) Changes in the distribution and extent of breeding colonies of egrets in Saitama Prefecture. Strix 11:189–209Google Scholar
  26. Orians G, Wittenberger J (1991) Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. Am Nat 137:S29–S49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parkes ML, Mora MA, Feagin RA (2012) Using scale, cover type and GIS to evaluate nuisance cattle egret colony site selection. Waterbirds 35:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A (2006) Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seppelt R, Voinov A (2002) Optimization methodology for land use patterns using spatially explicit landscape models. Ecol Model 151:125–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  31. Tojo H (1996) Habitat selection, foraging behavior and prey of five heron species in Japan. Jpn J Ornithol 45:141–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tourenq C, Benhamou S, Sadoul N, Sandoz A, Mesleard F, Martin J, Hafner H (2004) Spatial relationships between tree-nesting heron colonies and rice fields in the Camargue, France. Auk 121:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiens JA, Milne BT (1989) Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle’s perspective. Landsc Ecol 3:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Carrasco
    • 1
  • Miyuki Mashiko
    • 1
  • Yukihiko Toquenaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations