Abstract
The WBE model was used to predict intraspecific scaling relationships among mean branch, needle, stem, root, and above-ground masses across eight stands of Pinus massoniana to test whether the scaling exponent was (1) dependent on site and (2) in accordance with WBE theory. The results showed that mean stem and root masses as well as mean above-ground and root masses scaled in a near-isometric manner across sites, except at two sites, which exhibited an exponent slightly less than unity. Mean needle mass scaled as 3/4 power of mean stem mass, except at one site, which exhibited an exponent slightly higher than 3/4. Mean branch mass scaled isometrically with mean stem mass at each site. These results supported the WBE theory. However, mean branch mass across sites scaled neither as 3/4 nor 1 power of mean stem mass, indicating that the scaling relationship predicted by WBE theory for these two components did not hold in P. massoniana stands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertram JEA (1989) Size-dependent differential scaling in branches: the mechanical design of trees revisited. Trees 4:241–253
Bokma F (2004) Evidence against universal metabolic allometry. Funct Ecol 18:184–187
Chambers JQ, dos Santos J, Ribeiro RJ, Higuchi N (2001) Tree damage, allometric relationships, and above-ground net primary production in central Amazon forest. Forest Ecol Manag 152:73–84
Cheng DL, Niklas KJ (2007) Above- and below-ground biomass relationships across 1,534 forested communities. Ann Bot 99:95–102
Cheng DL, Wang GX, Li T, Tang QL, Gong CM (2007) Relationships among the stem, aboveground and total biomass across Chinese forests. J Integr Plant Biol 49:1573–1579
Ding GJ (2003) Study on biomass and productivity of Masson pine planting stand. I. Biomass and density effect of different planting density. J Fujian Coll For 23:34–38 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Ding GJ, Wang PC (2001) Study on change laws of biomass and productivity of Masson pine forest plantation. II. Biomass and productivity of stand at different ages. Forest Res 15:54–60 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Enquist BJ (2002) Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiol 22:1045–1064
Enquist BJ (2003) Scaling the macroecological and evolutionary implications of size and metabolism within and across plant taxa. Blackwell Publishing, Birmingham
Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2001) Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities. Nature 410:655–660
Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2002) Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295:1517–1520
Enquist BJ, Brown JH, West GB (1998) Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density. Nature 395:163–165
Enquist BJ, West GB, Charnov EL, Brown JH (1999) Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature 401:907–911
Falster D, Warton D, Wright I (2006) User’s guide to SMATR: standardised major axis tests and routines version 2.0, copyright 2006. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/
Garber SM, Maguire DA (2005) Vertical trends in maximum branch diameter in two mixed-species spacing trials in the central Oregon Cascades. Can J Forest Res 35:295–307
Gene A, Wernsdörfer H, Jonard M, Pretzsch H, Rauch M, Ponettec Q, Nys C, Legout A, Ranger J, Vallet P, Saint-André L (2011) Ontogeny partly explains the apparent heterogeneity of published biomass equations for Fagus sylvatica in central Europe. Forest Ecol Manag 261:1188–1202
Huang YX, Zhao XY, Zhang HX, Japhet W, Zuo XA, Luo YY, Huang G (2009) Allometric effects of Agriophyllum squarrosum in response to soil nutrients, water, and population density in the Horqin Sandy Land of China. J Plant Biol 52:210–219
Kaitaniemi P (2004) Testing allometric scaling laws. J Theor Biol 228:149–153
Khan MNI, Suwa R, Hagihara A (2009) Biomass and aboveground net primary production in a subtropical mangrove stand of Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong at Manko Wetland, Okinawa, Japan. Wetlands Ecol Manag 17:585–599
Kozlowski J, Konarzewski M (2004) Is West Brown and Enquist's model of allometric scaling mathematically correct and biologically relevant? Funct Ecol 18:283–289
Lauenroth WK (2000) Methods of estimating belowground net primary production. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 58–71
Li HT, Han XG, Wu JG (2005) Lack of evidence for 3/4 scaling of metabolism in terrestrial plants. J Integr Plant Biol 47:1173–1183
Li H, Han X-G, Wu J-G (2006) Variant scaling relationship for massdensity across tree-dominated communities. J Integr Plant Biol (formerly Acta Bot Sin) 48:268–277
Ma C, Dong SF, Mo JM (2012) Response of litter decomposition to changes of litter input in a pine forest of Dinghushan. Ecol Environ Sci 21:647–653
Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li BL (2003) A note on metabolic rate dependence on body size in plants and animals. J Theor Biol 221:301–307
Makkonen K, Helmissar HS (2001) Fine root biomass and production in Scots pine stands relative to stand age. Tree Physiol 21:193–198
Niklas KJ (1994) Plant allometry. In: The scaling of form and process. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Niklas KJ (2005) Modelling below- and above-ground biomass for non-woody and woody plants. Ann Bot 95:315–321
Niklas KJ (2006) Scaling the paths of resistance. New Phytol 169:219–222
Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ (2001) Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2922–2927
Niklas KJ, Spatz H-C (2006) Allometric theory and the mechanical stability of large trees: proof and conjecture. Am J Bot 93:824–828
Niklas KJ, Molina-Freaner F, Tinoco-Ojanguren C, Paolillo DJ Jr (2002) The biomechanics of Pachycereus pringlei root systems. Am J Bot 89:12–21
Niklas KJ, Midgley JJ, Enquist BJ (2003) A general model for mass–growth–density relations across tree-dominated communities. Evol Ecol Res 5:459–468
Ogawa K (2008) The leaf mass/number trade-off of Kleiman and Aarssen implies constancy of leaf biomass, its density and carbon uptake in forest stands: scaling up from shoot to stand level. J Ecol 96:188–191
Pilli R, Anfodillo T, Carrer M (2006) Towards a functional and simplified allometry for estimating forest biomass. Forest Ecol Manag 237:583–593
Savage VM, Deeds EJ, Fontana W (2008) Sizing up allometric scaling theory. PLoS Comput Biol 4:1–17
Schulze ED, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Jobbágy E, Buchmann N, Bauer G, Canadell J, Jackson RB, Loreti J, Oesterheld M, Ehleringer JE (1996) Rooting depth, water availability, and vegetation cover along an aridity gradient in Patagonia. Oecologia 108:503–511
Van Noordwijk M, Mulia R (2002) Functional branch analysis as tool for fractal scaling above- and belowground trees for their additive and non-additive properties. Ecol Model 149:41–51
Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81:259–291
West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400:664–667
Xiang WH, Liu SH, Deng XW, Shen AH, Lei XD, Tian DL, Zhao MF, Peng CH (2011) General allometric equations and biomass allocation of Pinus massoniana trees on a regional scale in southern China. Ecol Res 26:697–711
Xue L, Hagihara A (2008) Density effects of tree organs in self-thinning Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. stands. Ecol Res 23:689–695
Xue L, Feng HF, Chen FX (2010) Time-trajectory of mean component weight and density in self-thinning Pinus densiflora stands. Eur J Forest Res 129:1027–1035
Zhang K, Xu XN, Wang Q, Liu B (2010) Biomass, and carbon and nitrogen pools in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in eastern China. J Forest Res 15:274–282
Acknowledgments
The study was partially supported by Foundation of Guangdong Forestry Bureau (No. 4400-F11031, 4400-F11055).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Xue, L., Lie, G., Lu, G. et al. Allometric scaling among tree components in Pinus massoniana stands with different sites. Ecol Res 28, 327–333 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-1021-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-1021-x