Ecological Research

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 67–79 | Cite as

Altitudinal patterns of plant species richness on the Baekdudaegan Mountains, South Korea: mid-domain effect, area, climate, and Rapoport’s rule

  • Chang-Bae Lee
  • Jung-Hwa Chun
  • Ho-Kyung Song
  • Hyun-Je Cho
Original Article

Abstract

We studied the altitudinal patterns of plant species richness and examined the effects of geometric constraints, area, and climatic factors on the observed richness patterns along the ridge of the Baekdudaegan Mountains, South Korea. Rapoport’s altitudinal rule was evaluated by examining the relationship between altitudinal range size and midpoint. We also examined the latitudinal effect on species richness. Plant data were collected from 1,100 plots along a 200–1,900 m altitudinal gradient along the ridge of the Baekdudaegan. A total of 802 plant species from 97 families and 342 genera were found. The altitudinal patterns of plant species richness along the ridge of the Baekdudaegan depicted distinctly hump-shaped patterns, although the absolute altitudes of the richness peaks vary somewhat among plant groups. While the mid-domain effect (MDE) was the most powerful explanatory variable in simple regression models, species richness was also associated with climatic factors, especially mean annual precipitation (MAP) and temperature (MAT) in multiple regression models. The relative importance of the MDE and climatic factors were different among plant groups. The MDE was more important for woody plants and for large-ranged species, whereas climatic factors were better predictors for total and herbaceous plants and for small-ranged species. Rapoport’s altitudinal rule and a latitudinal effect on species richness were not supported. Our study suggests that a combined interaction of the MDE and climatic factors influences species richness patterns along the altitudinal gradient of the Baekdudaegan Mountains, South Korea.

Keywords

Altitudinal gradient Climatic factors Hump-shaped pattern Mid-domain effect Rapoport’s altitudinal rule 

Supplementary material

11284_2012_1001_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (87 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 86 kb)
11284_2012_1001_MOESM2_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 16 kb)
11284_2012_1001_MOESM3_ESM.docx (270 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 270 kb)
11284_2012_1001_MOESM4_ESM.docx (211 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 211 kb)

References

  1. Acharya BK, Chettri B, Bijayan L (2011) Distribution patterns of trees along an elevation gradient Eastern Himalaya, India. Acta Oecol 37:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ah-Peng C, Wilding N, Kluge J, Descamps-Julien B, Bardat J, Chuah-Petiot M, Strasberg D, Hedderson TAJ (2012) Bryophyte diversity and range size distribution along two altitudinal gradients: continent versus island. Acta Oecol 42:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander JM, Kueffer C, Daehler CC, Edwards PJ, Pauchard A, Seipel T, Consortium M (2011) Assembly of nonnative floras along elevational gradients explained by directional ecological filtering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:656–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aubry S, Magnin F, Bonnet V, Preece RC (2005) Multi-scale altitudinal patterns in species richness of land snail communities in south-eastern France. J Biogeogr 32:985–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachman S, Baker WJ, Brummitt N, Dransfield J, Moat J (2004) Elevational gradients, area, and tropical island diversity: an example from the palms of New Guinea. Ecography 27:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck J, Chey VK (2008) Explaining the elevational diversity pattern of geometrid moths from Borneo: a test of five hypotheses. J Biogeogr 35:1452–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattarai KR, Vetaas OR (2003) Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevational gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattarai KR, Vetaas OR (2006) Can Rapoport’s rule explain tree species richness along the Himalayan elevational gradient, Nepal? Divers Distrib 12:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattarai KR, Vetaas OR, Grytnes JA (2004) Fern species richness along a Central Himalayan elevational gradient. Nepal. J Biogeogr 31:389–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braun-Blanquet J (1965) Plant sociology. Hafner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown JH, Lomolino MV (1998) Biogeography, 2nd edn. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Buckley HL, Miller TE, Ellison AM, Gotelli NJ (2003) Reverse latitudinal trends in species richness of pitcher-plant food webs. Ecol Lett 6:825–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardelús CL, Colwell RK, Watkins JE (2006) Vascular epiphyte distribution patterns: explaining the mid-elevation richness peak. J Ecol 94:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter C (2005) The environmental control of plant species density on a Himalayan elevation gradient. J Biogeogr 32:999–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colwell RK (2006) RangeModel: a Monte Carlo simulation tool for assessing geometric constraints on species richness. Version 5. User’s Guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/rangemodel
  16. Colwell RK (2009) Estimate S: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2. User’s Guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates
  17. Colwell RK, Hurtt GC (1994) Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapport effect. Am Nat 144:570–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colwell RK, Lees DC (2000) The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends Ecol Evol 15:70–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004a) Interpolating, extrapolating and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Colwell RK, Rahbek C, Gotelli NJ (2004b) The mid-domain effect and species richness patterns: what have we learned so far? Am Nat 163:E1–E23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113:791–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cruz FB, Fitzgerald LA, Espinoza RE, Schulte JA (2005) The importance of phylogenetic scale in tests of Bergmann’s and Rapoport’s rules: lessons from a clade of South American lizards. J Evol Biol 18:1559–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diniz-Filho JAE, Bini LM, Hawkins BA (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunn RR, Colwell RK, Nilsson C (2006) The river domain: why are there more species halfway up the river? Ecography 29:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fang JY, Lechowicz MJ (2006) Climatic limits for the present distribution of beech (Fagus L.) species in the world. J Biogeogr 33:1804–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fu C, Wu J, Wang X, Lei G, Chen J (2004) Patterns of diversity, altitudinal range and body size among freshwater fishes in the Yangtze River basin, China. Global Ecol Biogeogr 13:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fu C, Hua X, Li J, Chang Z, Pu Z, Chen J (2006) Elevational patterns of frog species richness and endemic richness in the Hengduan Mountains, China: geometric constraints, area and climate effects. Ecography 29:919–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grau O, Grytnes JA, Birks HJB (2007) A comparison of altitudinal species richness patterns of bryophytes with other plant groups in Nepal, Central Himalaya. J Biogeogr 34:1907–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grytnes JA, Vetaas OR (2002) Species richness and altitude: a comparison between null models and interpolated plant species richness along the Himalayan altitudinal gradient. Nepal. Am Nat 159:294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grytnes JA, Heegaard E, Ihlen PG (2006) Species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens along an altitudinal gradient in western Norway. Acta Oecol 29:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jetz W, Rahbek C (2002) Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297:1548–1551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karger DN, Kluge J, Krömer T, Hemp A, Lehnert M, Kessler M (2011) The effect of area on local and regional elevational patterns of species richness. J Biogeogr 38:1177–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kattan GH, Franco P (2004) Bird diversity along elevational gradients in the Andes of Colombia: area and mass effects. Global Ecol Biogeogr 13:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kluge J, Kessler M, Dunn RR (2006) What drives elevational patterns of diversity? A test of geometric constraints, climate and species pool effects for pteridophytes on an elevational gradient in Costa Rica. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:358–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kong WS (2008) Biogeography of Korea Plants, 2nd edn (in Korean). GeoBook, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  36. Korea Forest Research Institute (2003) Ecological aspects of Baekdu Mountains in Korea and delineation of their management and conservation area (in Korean). Korea Forest Research Institute [report no. 198], SeoulGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee PF, Ding TS, Hsu FH, Geng S (2004) Breeding bird species richness in Taiwan: distribution on gradients of elevation, primary productivity and urbanization. J Biogeogr 31:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li JS, Song YL, Zeng ZG (2003) Elevational gradients of small mammal diversity on the northern slopes of Mt. Qilian, China. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li J, He Q, Hua X, Zhou J, Xu H, Chen J, Fu C (2009) Climate and history explain the species richness peak at mid-elevation for Schizothorax fishes (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) distributed in the Tibetan Plateau and its adjacent regions. Global Ecol Biogeogr 18:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liew TS, Schilthuizen M, Lakim M (2010) The determinants of land snail diversity along a tropical elevational gradient: insularity, geometry and niches. J Biogeogr 37:1071–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marini L, Bona E, Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (2010) Exploring anthropogenic and natural processes shaping fern species richness along elevational gradient. J Biogeogr 38:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCain CM (2004) The mid-domain effect applied to elevational gradients: species richness of small mammals in Costa Rica. J Biogeogr 31:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCain CM (2005) Elevational gradients in diversity of small mammals. Ecology 86:366–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCain CM (2007) Area and mammalian elevational diversity. Ecology 88:76–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCain CM (2009) Global analysis of bird elevational diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr 18:346–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oommen MA, Shanker K (2005) Elevational species richness patterns emerge from multiple local mechanisms in Himalayan woody plants. Ecology 86:3039–3047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rahbek C (1995) The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography 18:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rahbek C (2005) The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol Lett 8:224–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rangel TF, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2010) SAM: a comprehensive application for spatial analysis in macroecology. Ecography 33:46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rohde K, Heap M, Heap D (1993) Rapoport’s rule does not apply to marine teleosts and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species richness. Am Nat 142:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Romdal TS, Grytnes JA (2007) An indirect area effect on elevational species richness patterns. Ecography 30:440–448Google Scholar
  52. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rowe RJ (2009) Environmental and geometric drivers of small mammal diversity along elevational gradients in Utah. Ecography 32:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanders NJ (2002) Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport’s rule. Ecography 25:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sanders NJ, Moss J, Wagner D (2003) Patterns of ant species richness along elevational gradients in an arid ecosystem. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shin JH (2002) Ecosystem geography of Korea. In: Lee DW, Jin V, Choe JC, Son YW, Yoo SJ, Lee HY, Hong SK, Ihm BS (eds) Ecology of Korea. Bumwoo, Seoul, pp 19–46Google Scholar
  57. Stevens GC (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. Am Nat 133:240–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stevens GC (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. Am Nat 140:893–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang Z, Tang Z, Fang J (2007) Altitudinal patterns of seed plant richness in the Gaoligong Mountains, south-east Tibet, China. Divers Distrib 13:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watkins JE, Cardelús C, Colwell RK, Moran RC (2006) Species richness and distribution of ferns along an elevational gradient in Costa Rica. Am J Bot 93:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Webb TJ, Gaston KJ (2003) On the heritability of geographic range sizes. Am Nat 161:553–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yim YJ (1977) Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in the Korean Peninsula: IV. zonal distribution of forest vegetation in relation to thermal climate. Jpn J Ecol 27:269–278Google Scholar
  63. Yim YJ, Kira T (1975) Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in the Korean Peninsula: I. distribution of some indices of thermal climate. Jpn J Ecol 25:77–88Google Scholar
  64. Zapata FA, Gaston KJ, Chown SL (2003) Mid-domain models of species richness gradients: assumptions, methods and evidence. J Anim Ecol 72:677–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. ZenHua S, ShengJin P, XiaoKun O (2007) Rapid assessment and explanation of tree species abundance along the elevation gradient in Gaoligong Mountains, Yunnan, China. Chin Sci Bull 52:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chang-Bae Lee
    • 1
  • Jung-Hwa Chun
    • 2
  • Ho-Kyung Song
    • 3
  • Hyun-Je Cho
    • 4
  1. 1.Korea Green Promotion AgencyDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Division of Forest EcologyKorea Forest Research InstituteSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Forest ResourcesChungnam National UniversityDaejeonKorea
  4. 4.Korea Forest Ecosystems InstituteDaeguKorea

Personalised recommendations