Skip to main content
Log in

Adventitious sprouting enables the invasive annual herb Euphorbia geniculata to regenerate after severe injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Euphorbia geniculata, an annual weed of arable land native to America and invasive in subtropical and tropical regions, is able to regenerate from seeds and is also able to produce adventitious buds on the hypocotyl. Whether sprouting from adventitious buds represents a mechanism for surviving severe injury, and whether this ability is crucial for species invasion is, however, not known. The significance of such sprouting was investigated with a field survey and a pot experiment. Among 897 plants in 25 field populations surveyed in Indonesia, only a few exhibited marks of injury and sprouting from adventitious buds. When seeds were collected from 12 of the populations and used in a pot experiment, however, the seedlings were able to survive severe injury (removal of all tissue above the hypocotyl) by sprouting from adventitious buds on the hypocotyl and were able to set seed, although they produced less vegetative and generative (flowers and fruits) biomass than control plants. Growth but not fitness of plants in the pot experiment was population specific but neither growth characteristic correlated with disturbance level assessed in the field. Although the pot experiment indicates that E. geniculata can cope with severe injury by adventitious sprouting from the hypocotyl, the survey data are inconsistent with the hypothesis that such adventitious sprouting is important for the plant’s invasion in tropical regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellingham PJ, Sparrow AD (2000) Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities. Oikos 89:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants—a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M, Pyšek P, Tichý L, Knollová I, Danihelka J (2005) Invasions of the Czech Republic by alien plants: a quantitative assessment across habitats. Preslia 77:339–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (1995) Plant invaders: the threat to natural communities. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • di Castri F (1990) On invading species and invaded ecosystems: the interplay of historical change and biological necessity. In: di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Debussche M (eds) Biological invasions in the Europe and Mediterranean Basin. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 3–16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz H, Edwards PJ (2006) Recognition that casual processes change during plant invasions helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87:1359–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubard M (1903) Recherches sur les plantes a bourgeons radicaux. Ann Sci Nat Bot Biol Veg 17:109–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetations processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VH (1989) Patterns, extents and modes of invasions by terrestrial plants. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp 31–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm L, Doll J, Holm E, Pancho J, Herberger J (1997) World weeds: natural histories and distribution. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath PD, Anderson VJ, Chao SW, Foley EM (2003) Knowing when to grow: signals regulating bud dormancy. Trends Plant Sci 8:534–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huhta AP, Hellström K, Rautio P, Tuomi J (2003) Grazing tolerance of Gentianella amarella and other monocarpic herbs: why is tolerance highest at low damage levels? Plant Ecol 166:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger H, Kowarik I (2010) Resilience of native plant community following manual control of invasive Cinchona pubescens in Galapagos. Restor Ecol 18:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kigel J, Lior E, Zamir L, Rubin B (1992) Biology of reproduction in the summer annual weed Euphorbia geniculata Ortega. Weed Res 32:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimešová J (2011) Vegetative propagation. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 678–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimešová J, de Bello F (2009) (CLO-PLA): the database of clonal and bud bank traits of Central European flora. J Veg Sci 20:511–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimešová J, Klimeš L (2003) Resprouting of herbs in disturbed habitats: is it adequately described by the Bellingham–Sparrow’s model? Oikos 103:225–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimešová J, Sosnová M, Martínková J (2007) Life-history variation in the short-lived herb Rorippa palustris: effects of germination date and injury timing. Plant Ecol 189:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann J, Brink-Jensen K, Frandsen SI, Hansen MK (2009) Uprooting and burial of invasive alien plants: a new tool in coastal restoration? Restor Ecol 19:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurokochi H, Toyama K (2010) Regeneration of Robinia pseudoacacia riparian forests after clear-cutting along the Chikumagawa River in Japan. Plant Ecol 210:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera L, Lichtenegger E (1992) Wurzeatlas mitteleuropäischer Grünlandpflanzen. Band 2. Pteridophyta und Dicotyledoneae (Magnoliopsida). Fischer, Stuttgart

  • Latzel V, Dospělová L, Klimešová J (2009) Annuals sprouting adventitiously from the hypocotyl: their compensatory growth and implications for weed management. Biologia 64:923–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latzel V, Malíková L, Klimešová J (2011) Compensatory growth of Euphorbia peplus regenerating from a bud bank. Botany 89:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WG (2011) Islands. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 391–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Malíková L, Šmilauer P, Klimešová J (2010) Occurrence of adventitious sprouting in short-lived monocarpic herbs: a field study of 22 weedy species. Ann Bot 105:905–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martínková J, Klimešová J, Mihulka S (2004) Resprouting after disturbance: an experimental study with short-lived monocarpic herbs. Folia Geobot 39:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínková J, Klimešová J, Mihulka S (2008) Compensation of seed production after severe injury in the short-lived herb Barbarea vulgaris. Basic Appl Ecol 9:44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihulka S, Pyšek P, Martínková J, Jarošík V (2006) Invasiveness of Oenothera congeners alien to Europe: Jack of all trades, master of invasion? Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neve P, Vila-Aiub M, Roux F (2009) Evolutionary thinking in agricultural weed management. New Phytol 184:783–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardini EA, Teller BJ, Knight TM (2008) Consequences of density dependence for management of a stage-structured invasive plant (Alliaria petiolata). Am Midl Nat 160:310–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardini AE, Drake MJ, Chase MJ, Knight MT (2009) Complex population dynamics and control of the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard). Ecol Appl 19:387–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2007) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W (ed) Biological invasions. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Sixtová Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trend Ecol Evol 23:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauh W (1937) Die Bildung von Hypocotyl- und Wurzelsprossen und ihre Bedeutung für die Wuchsformen der Phlanzen. Nova Acta Leopold 4:395–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M (1995) What makes a species invasive? In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade PM (eds) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB, Amsterdam, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Williams P, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasions in the southern hemisphere: determinants of spread and invasibility. J Biogeograph 21:511–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown JW, Lovett-Doust J (1993) Introduction to plant population biology. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosnová M, Klimešová J (2009) Storage of carbon in relation to life history mode and resprouting ability in short-lived root-sprouter Rorippa palustris. Acta Oecol 5:691–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc. (2010) STATISTICA for Windows (Computer program manual). Version 8.0 Available at: http://www.statsoft.com

  • Sykora KV (1990) History of impact of man on the distribution of plant species. In: di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Dbussche M (eds) Biological invasion in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 37–50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjitrosoedirdjo SS (2005) Inventory of the invasive alien plant species in Indonesia. Biotropia 25:60–73

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon B, Langston BV, Harger RT, Johnsey SP (1984) Potential for adventitious regeneration of selected weed species. Weed Sci 32:360–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Walker LR, Whitaker LD, Mueller-Dombois D, Matson PA (1987) Biological invasion by Myrica faia alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238:802–804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH (1999) Colocasia. In: manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, pp 1356–1357

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse DF (1997) The major invertebrate pests and weeds of agriculture and plantation forestry in the Southern and Western Pacific. The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock VB (1884) Ueber Wurzelsprossen bei kräutigarten Gewächsen, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf ihre verschiedene biologische Bedeutung. Botanisches Centralblatt 17: 227–232, 257–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Wydler H (1850) Über subcotyledonare Sprossbildung. Flora 8:37–338

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Bruce Jaffee for English corrections. The study was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (GD206/08/H044, P504/12/P540) and by the Institute of Botany ASCR (AV0Z60050516).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lenka Malíková.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 50 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Malíková, L., Mudrák, O. & Klimešová, J. Adventitious sprouting enables the invasive annual herb Euphorbia geniculata to regenerate after severe injury. Ecol Res 27, 841–847 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-0960-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-0960-6

Keywords

Navigation