Ecological Research

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 407–416 | Cite as

Variation in breeding parameters of Eleonora’s falcon (Falco eleonorae) and factors affecting its reproductive performance

  • S. M. XirouchakisEmail author
  • J. Fric
  • C. Kassara
  • D. Portolou
  • A. Dimalexis
  • G. Karris
  • C. Barboutis
  • P. Latsoudis
  • S. Bourdakis
  • E. Kakalis
  • S. Sfenthourakis
Original Article


We gathered data for a four-year period (2004–2007) on the nesting ecology and reproductive performance of Eleonora’s falcon in the Aegean Sea. We investigated in an indirect way the relation between clutch size and pre-laying food availability, the significance of site and pair quality on productivity, and the effects of habitat and intraspecific competition on breeding success. Overall, the species selected nest sites sheltered from sun exposure but not from the prevailing wind. Hatching, fledging, and breeding success rates were estimated at 64, 72%, and 60%, respectively. Fledglings per breeding pair ranged from 1.19 to 1.75, and fledglings per successful pair from 1.84 to 2.0, between the years. Productivity depended on parental care rather than nest-site quality. Breeding parameters varied significantly between the years, exhibiting a strong spatial yet local effect. Low success rates were recorded in specific colonies, which were attributed to adverse weather conditions and habitat degradation. Insect food availability prior to egg-laying, estimated via plant biomass, was positively correlated to clutch size. Meanwhile, low wind strengths in August, large distances from the mainland, and population size in the vicinity of the colonies had negative effects on breeding success. Considering data at the Mediterranean scale, a longitudinal trend is observed across the breeding range of this species, with breeding parameters slightly decreasing from west to east.


Falco eleonorae Aegean Sea Breeding parameters 



We would like thank C. Lagouvardos, M. Martinez, I. Mitchell, J. Mayol, A. Badami, and G. Urios for their technical advice; two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript; and C. Grivas, M. Ivovič, M. Hatzikyrkas, A. Christopoulos, E. Gourvelou, G. Katsadorakis, M. Panayotopoulou, C. Viada, G. Vardanis, P. Lymberakis, C. Papakonstantinou, Μ. Gletsos, A. Kastritis, N. Tsiopelas, V. Saravia, and all volunteers and boat captains for their assistance in the field. The study was funded by the European Union (LIFE/03NAT/GR000091) and the Leventis Foundation.


  1. Akaike H (1980) Likelihood and the Bayes procedure. In: Bernardo JM, De Groot MH, Lindley DV, Smith AFM (eds) Bayesian statistics. University Press, ValenciaGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashmole NP (1963) The regulation of numbers of tropical oceanic birds. Ibis 103:458–473Google Scholar
  3. Azafzaf H (2004) Numbers of Falco eleonorae breeding in Tunisia in 2004 (unpublished report of the Association “Les Amis des Oiseaux,” Groupe Tunisien d’Ornithologie to the RSPB; LIFE Nature project LIFE03 NAT/GR/000091 “Conservation measures for Falco eleonorae in Greece”). Association “Les Amis des Oiseaux,” ArianaGoogle Scholar
  4. Badami A (1998) Breeding biology and conservation of Eleonora’s falcon Falco eleonorae in South-West Sardinia, Italy. In: Chancellor RD, Meyburg B-U, Ferrero JJ (eds) Holarctic birds of prey. Proceedings of an international conference. ADENEX-WWGBP, Badajoz, pp 149–156Google Scholar
  5. Bates D, Sarkar D (2006) Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.99975-10.
  6. BirdLife Cyprus (2004) Breeding survey of the Eleonora’s falcon Falco eleonorae in Cyprus, summary (internal report to the RSPB; LIFE Nature project LIFE03 NAT/GR/000091 “Conservation measures for Falco eleonorae in Greece”). BirdLife Cyprus, NicosiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Birdlife International (1999) International species action plan: Eleonora’s falcon Falco eleonorae. Accessed in 2009
  8. BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status (BirdLife conservation series no. 12). BirdLife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Birkhead TR, Furness RW (1985) Regulation of seabird populations. In: Sibly RM, Smith R (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 145–167Google Scholar
  10. Bonnín J (2004) Recompte i parámetres reproductors de la població balear del Falcó marí Falco eleonorae a l’any 2004. Anuari Ornitológic de les Balears 19:1–9Google Scholar
  11. Carapiperis LN (1968) The winds of the Greek Seas. Meteorol Inst, Athens University, Athens (in Greek)Google Scholar
  12. Carrai V, Congiu A, Teofili C, Bulgarini F (2003) Presenza del Falco della Regina (Falco eleonorae) lungo la costa del Golfo di Orosei (Sardegna centro-orientale). Avocetta 27:26Google Scholar
  13. Carrascal LM, Moreno J, Amat JA (1995) Nest maintenance and stone theft in a chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis Antarctica). 2: Effects of breeding group size. Polar Biol 15:541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark AL (1974) The population and reproduction of the Eleonora’s falcon in Morocco. Bull Soc Sci Nat Phys Maroc 54:61–69Google Scholar
  15. Clark AC, Peakal DB (1977) Organochlorine residues in Eleonoras falcon Falco eleonorae, its eggs and its prey. Ibis 119:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crawley M (2007) The R book. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De León L, Rodríguez B, Martín A, Nogales M, Alonso J, Izquierdo C (2007) Status, distribution and diet of Eleonora’s Falcon (Falco eleonorae) in the Canary Islands. J Raptor Res 41:334–339Google Scholar
  18. Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie D (1994) Handbook of the birds of the world. Lynx Editions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  19. Dhondt AA, Kempenaers B, Adriaensen F (1992) Density-dependent clutch size caused by habitat heterogeneity. J Anim Ecol 61:643–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dimalexis A, Xirouchakis S, Latsoudis P, Portolou D, Karris G, Georgiakakis P, Fric J, Barboutis C, Bourdakis S, Kakalis E, Ivovič M, Kominos T (2008) Breeding distribution and population status of the Eleonora’s falcon (Falco eleonorae) in Greece. J Ornithol 149:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dolç-Garcia JCD, Dies JN (1987) El halcón de Eleonor (Falco eleonorae, Géné) en las islas Columbretes. In: Matilla LA, Carretero JL, Garcia AM (eds) Islas Columbretes: contribución al estudio de su medio natural. Generalitat Valencia, Valencia, pp 241–262Google Scholar
  22. ESRI (2006) ArcGIS desktop for Windows, version 8.3 (ArcInfo). ESRI, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  23. Faraway JJ (2006) Extending the linear model with R. Generalized linear mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernández C, Azkona P, Donázar JA (1998) Density-dependent effects on productivity in the Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus: the role of interference and habitat heterogeneity. Ibis 140:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forster IP, Phillips RA (2009) Influence of nest location, density and topography on breeding success in the Black-browed Albatross Thalassarche melanophris. Mar Ornithol 37:213–217Google Scholar
  26. Gil-Sánchez JM, Moleón M, Otero M, Bautista J (2004) A nine-year study of successful breeding in a Bonelli’s eagle population in southeast Spain: a basis for conservation. Biol Conserv 118:685–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giraudoux P (2009). Package ‘pgirmess.’ Accessed in 2009
  28. Gschweng M, Kalko EK, Querenr U, Fiedler W, Berthold P (2008) All across Africa: highly individual migration routes of the Eleonora’s falcon. Proc R Soc B. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0575
  29. Gschweng M, Tataruch F, Fröhlich O, Kalko EV (2011) Dead embryos despite low contaminant loads in eggs of Eleonora’s Falcon. ISRN Zool. doi: 10.5402/2011/510202
  30. Gustin M, Corso A, Medda M (2005) Monitoring on breeding population of Eleonora’s Falcon in Italy during 2005 (unpublished report to the RSPB; LIFE Nature project LIFE03 NAT/GR/000091 “Conservation measures for Falco eleonorae in Greece”). RSPB, SandyGoogle Scholar
  31. Hedenström A, Alerstam T (1995) Optimal flight speed of birds. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 348:471–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hellenic National Meteorological Service (2006) The climate of Greece. Accessed in 2009
  33. Jenouvrier S, Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2003) Effects of climate variability on the temporal population dynamics of southern fulmars. J Anim Ecol 72:576–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kovach Computing Services (2005) Oriana version 2.02. Accessed in 2009
  35. Krüger O (2004) The importance of competition, food, habitat, weather and phenotype for the reproduction of Buzzard Buteo buteo: capsule variation in reproduction between territories was strongly influenced by intra- and interspecific competition, phenotype, levels of rainfall and human disturbance. Bird Study 51:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. López-Darias M, Rumeu B (2010) Status and population trend of Eleonora’s Falcon Falco eleonorae in the Canary Islands. Ornis Fenn 87:35–40Google Scholar
  37. Mardia KV, Jupp PE (2000) Statistics of directional data. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  38. Martínez-Abrain A, Oro D, Ferrís V, Belenguer R (2002) Is growing tourist activity affecting the distribution or number of pairs in a small colony of the Eleonora’s Falcon?. Anim Biodivers Conserv 25:47–51Google Scholar
  39. Martinez JE, Pagan I, Calco JF (2006) Interannual variations of reproductive parameters in a Booted eagle (Hieraaetus pennatus) population: the influence of density and laying date. J Ornithol 147:612–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mocci Demartis A, Peddis S (1999) Osservazioni relative all’ influsso dei venti sul successo del ciclo riproduttivo del Falco della Regina (Falco eleonorae), in Sardegna. Rendiconti Seminario della Facolta dis Scienze dell’ Universita di Cagliari 69:109–112Google Scholar
  41. Mock DW, Drummond H, Stinson H (1990) Avian siblicide. Am Sci 78:438–449Google Scholar
  42. Mougeot F (2004) Breeding density, cuckoldry risk and copulation behaviour during the fertile period in raptors: a comparative analysis. Anim Behav 67:1067–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  44. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plummer SE (2000) Perspective on combining ecological process models and remotely sensed data. Ecol Model 129:169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  48. Ristow D (2004) On the insect diet of Eleonora’s Falcon Falco eleonorae and its importance for coloniality. In: Chancellor RD, Meyburg B-U (eds) Raptors worldwide: proceedings of the VI World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls. WWGBP/MME, Berlin, pp 705–712Google Scholar
  49. Ristow D, Wink M (1985) Breeding success and conservation management of Eleonora’s falcon. In: Newton I, Chancellor RD (eds) Conservation studies on raptors (ICBP technical publication no. 5). ICBP, Cambridge, pp 147–152Google Scholar
  50. Ristow D, Wink C, Wink M (1979) Site tenacity and pair bond of the Eleonora’s Falcon. Ιl-Μerill 20:16–18Google Scholar
  51. Ristow D, Wink C, Wink M (1986) Assessment of Mediterranean autumn migration by prey analysis of Eleonora’s Falcon. Ric Biol Selvaggina 10:285–295Google Scholar
  52. Rosén M, Hedenström A, Badami A, Spina F, Akesson S (1999) Hunting flight behaviour of the Eleonora’s falcon Falco eleonorae. J Avian Biol 30:342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rubolini D, Fasola M (2008) Geographic patterns in reproductive parameters among nearctic herons (ardeidae). Auk 125:374–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seoane J, Carrascal LM (2008) Interspecific differences in population trends of Spanish birds are related to habitat and climatic preferences. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:111–121Google Scholar
  55. Serrano D, Oro D, Ursua E, Tella JL (2005) Colony size selection determines adult survival and dispersal preferences. Allee effect in a colonial bird. Am Nat 166:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sevenster JG (1996) Aggregation and coexistence. I. Theory and analysis. J Anim Ecol 65:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shunlin L (2004) Quantitative remote sensing of land surfaces. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  58. Sillet TS, Rodenhouse NL, Holmes RT (2004) Experimentally reducing neighbour density affects reproduction and behaviour of a migratory songbird. Ecology 85:2467–2477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simmons RE (1988) Offspring quality and the evolution of cainism. Ibis 130:339–357Google Scholar
  60. Spina F, Schenk H, Massa B (1985) Status and conservation of Eleonora’s falcon in Italy. In: Newton I, Chancellor RD (eds) Conservation studies on raptors (ICBP technical publication no. 5). ICPB, Cambridge, pp 143–152Google Scholar
  61. Steenhof K (1987) Assessing raptor reproductive success and productivity. In: Pendleton BAG, Misslap BA, Cline KW, Bird DM (eds) Raptor management techniques manual. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, pp 157–170Google Scholar
  62. Suárez M (2001) Las rapaces nidificantes en el archipiélago de Cabrera. In: Pons GX (ed) Las aves del parque nacional marítimo-terrestre del archipiélago de Cabrera (Islas Baleares, España): G.O.B. Colecciones Técnicas del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, pp 233–252Google Scholar
  63. Suryan RM, Irons DB, Brown ED, Jodice PGR, Roby DD (2006) Site specific effects on productivity of an upper trophic-level marine predator: bottom-up, top-down, and mismatch effects on reproduction in a colonial seabird. Prog Oceanogr 68:303–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomson PM, Ollason JC (2001) Lagged effects of ocean climate change on fulmar population dynamics. Nature 413:417–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Urios G, Martínez-Abraín A (2006) The study of nest-site preferences in Eleonora’s falcon Falco eleonorae through digital terrain models on a western Mediterranean island. J Ornithol 147:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vahl WK, Van Der Meer J, Meijer K, Piersma T, Weissing FJ (2007) Interference competition, the spatial distribution of food and free-living foragers. Anim Behav 74:1493–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walter H (1979) Eleonora’s falcon: adaptations to prey and habitat in a social raptor. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  68. Walter H, Foers R (1979) Falco eleonorae on Cyprus: population size and breeding success. Birds Cyprus Bird Report 10:58–65Google Scholar
  69. Wink M, Ristow D (2000) Biology and molecular genetics of Eleonora’s falcon Falco eleonorae, a colonial raptor of Mediterranean Islands. In: Chancellor RD, Meyburg B-U (eds) Raptors at risk. WWGDB/Hancock House, Washington, DC, pp 653–668Google Scholar
  70. Wink M, Wink C, Ristow D (1982) Biologie des Eleonorenfalken (Falco eleonorae): 10. Der Einfluß der Horstlage auf den Bruterfolg. J Ornithol 123:401–408Google Scholar
  71. Wink M, Biebach H, Feldmann F, Scharlau W, Swatschek I, Wink C, Ristow D (1993) Contribution to the breeding biology of Eleonora’s Falcon (Falco eleonorae). In: Nicholls MK, Clarke R (eds) Biology and conservation of the small falcons. Hawk and Owl Trust, Taunton, pp 59–72Google Scholar
  72. Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  73. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Xirouchakis
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Fric
    • 2
  • C. Kassara
    • 3
  • D. Portolou
    • 2
  • A. Dimalexis
    • 4
  • G. Karris
    • 5
  • C. Barboutis
    • 6
  • P. Latsoudis
    • 2
  • S. Bourdakis
    • 2
  • E. Kakalis
    • 7
  • S. Sfenthourakis
    • 3
  1. 1.Natural History Museum of Crete, University of CreteHeraklionGreece
  2. 2.Hellenic Ornithological Society/BirdLife-GreeceAthensGreece
  3. 3.Section of Animal Biology, Department of BiologyUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece
  4. 4.Nature Conservation Consultants (NCC)AthensGreece
  5. 5.Department of Environment Technology and EcologyTechnological Educational Institute of the Ionian IslandsZakynthosGreece
  6. 6.Department of BiologyUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece
  7. 7.Biodiversity Management Lab, Department of EnvironmentUniversity of the AegeanMytiliniGreece

Personalised recommendations