Ecological Research

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 315–325 | Cite as

Changes in plant species diversity along a chronosequence of vegetation restoration in the humid evergreen broad-leaved forest in the Rainy Zone of West China

  • Wanze Zhu
  • Song Cheng
  • Xiaohu Cai
  • Fei He
  • Jinxi Wang
Original Article

Abstract

Plant species diversity has been recognized as one of the vital attributes for assessing vegetation restoration. Changes in the diversity may be related to different stages of succession. In this study, 54 sites of humid, evergreen, broad-leaved forest were selected in the Rainy Zone of West China. A chronosequence of the sites was used to study the successive patterns of the diversity in the forest that had undergone natural regeneration for 5 to 350 years and to test the hypothesis that the diversity is maximized in mid-succession. Data were collected simultaneously at different stages of succession, and four α-diversity indices (species richness, Margalef index, Shannon-Wiener index, Pielou Evenness index) and two β-diversity indices (Whittaker index, Sørensen’s index) were calculated for each stratum in each plot. A total of 394 vascular plant species were recorded. From the β-diversity indices, the forest succession may be divided into the early-successional stage (before 50 years), mid-successional stage (from 50 to 300 years), and late-successional stage (after 300 years). In this community, the species diversity and richness were found to be the greatest at the mid-successional stage, followed by the late- and early-successional stages. The results of regression analysis indicated that the richness and Margalef index peaked around the 175th and 165th year, respectively. Shannon-Wiener index values also appeared to follow an approximately humped pattern of succession and were maximal around the 100th year. However, the species evenness did not show any significant relationship with successional age. Our results demonstrate (1) forest restoration is a long-term process and the formation of climax forest requires at least 300 years and (2) the forest has a strong capacity for restoration. Our results also suggest Lindera limprichitii and Machilus pingii as ideal tree species for afforestation because of their wide niche.

Keywords

Niche Rainy Zone of West China Species diversity Species evenness Species richness 

References

  1. Aplet GH, Vitousek PM (1994) An age-altitude matrix analysis of Hawaiian rain-forest succession. J Ecol 82:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson J, Floret C, Ovalle C, Pontanier R (1993) Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid lands. II. Case studies in southern Tunisia, central Chile and northern Cameroon. Restor Ecol 3:168–187Google Scholar
  3. Aubert M, Alard D, Bureau F (2003) Diversity of plant assemblages in managed temperate forests: a case study in Mormandy (France). Forest Ecol Manage 175:321–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auclair AN, Goff FG (1971) Diversity relations of upland forests in the western Great Lakes area. Am Nat 105:499–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazzaz FA (1975) Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in southern Illinois. Ecology 56:485–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burslem DFRP, Withmore TC, Denmark N (1998) A thirty-year record of forest dynamics from Kolomnangara, Solomon Islands. In: Man and the biosphere series,vol 20. UNESCO, Paris, pp 633–645Google Scholar
  7. Cadotte MW, Tadashi F (2005) Dispersal, spatial scale, and species diversity in a hierarchically structured experimental landscape. Ecol Lett 8:548–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caspersen JP, Pacala SW (2001) Successional diversity and forest ecosystem function. Ecol Res 16:895–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen XW, Li BL, Li ZS (2003) The acceleration of succession for the restoration of the mixed-broadleaved Korean pine forests in Northeast China. Forest Ecol Manage 177:503–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiarucci A, de Dominicis V, Wilson JB (2001) Structure and floristic diversity in permanent monitoring plots in forest ecosystems of Tuscany. Forest Ecol Manage 141:201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chinea JD, Helmer EH (2003) Diversity and composition of tropical secondary forests recovering from large-scale clearing: results from the 1990 inventory in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecol Manage 180:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen NL (1977) Changes in structure, pattern, and diversity associated with climax forest maturation in piedmont, North Carolina. Am Midl Nat 97:176–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark JS, Macklin E, Wood L (1998) Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecol Monogr 68:213–235Google Scholar
  14. Collins SL, Glenn SM, Gibson DJ (1995) Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition: decoupling cause and effect. Ecology 76:486–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, Núňez P, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP (2002) Beta diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs: high diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in nonequilibrium state. Science 199:1302–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Denslow JS (1980) Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimes. Oecologia 46:18–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denslow JS (1995) Disturbance and diversity in tropical rain forests: the density effect. Ecol Appl 5:962–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donnegan JA, Rebertus AJ (1999) Rates and mechanisms of subalpine forest succession along an environmental gradient. Ecology 80:1370–1384Google Scholar
  21. Dorren LKA, Berger F, Imeson AC, Maier B, Rey F (2004) Integrity, stability and management of protection forests in the European Alps. Forest Ecol Manage 195:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Editorial Group for Country Studies on Biodiversity in China (1998) The National Report of China Biodiversity Status. China Environmental Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  23. Elgersma AM (1998) Primary forest succession on poor sandy soils as related to site factors. Biodivers Conserv 7:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliott KJ, Swank WT (1994) Changes in tree species diversity after successive clearcuts in the Southern Appalachians. Plant Ecol 115:11–18Google Scholar
  25. Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1(9):488–494Google Scholar
  26. El-Sheikh MA (2005) Plant succession on abandoned fields after 25 years of shifting cultivation in Assuit, Egypt. J Arid Environ 61:461–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feagin RA, Wu XB, Smeins FE, Whisenant SG, Grant WE (2005) Individual versus community level processes and pattern formation in a model of sand dune plant succession. Ecol Model 183:435–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fries C, Johansson O, Pettersson B, Simonsson P (1997) Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. Forest Ecol Manage 84:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilliam FS, Turrill NL, Adams MB (1995) Herb-layer and overstory species in clear-cut and mature central Appalachian hardwood forests. Ecol Appl 5:947–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Golley FB, Gentry JB (1966) A comparison of variety and standing crop of vegetation on a one-year and a twelve-year abandoned field. Oikos 15:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gove JH, Martin CW, Patil GP, Solomon DS, Hornbeck JW (1992) Plant species diversity on even-aged harvests at the Hubbard Brook experimental forest: 10 year results. Can J Forest Res 22:1800–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grau HR, Arturi MF, Brown AD, Acenolaza PG (1997) Floristic and structural patterns along a chronosequence of secondary forest succession in Argentinean subtropical montane forests. Forest Ecol Manage 95:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greuter W, McNeill J, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Demoulin V, Filgueiras TS, Nicolson DH, Silva PC, Skog JE, Trehane P, Turland NJ, Hawksworth DL (eds) (2000) International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (St. Louis Code). Koeltz Scientific Books, Knigstein Google Scholar
  34. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hanks JP (1971) Secondary succession and soils on the inner coastal plain of New Jersey. B Torrey Bot Club 98:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. He JS, Chen WL, Jiang MX, Jin YX, Hu T, Lu P (1998) Plant species diversity of the degraded ecosystems in the three Gorges Region. Acta Ecol Sin 18:399–407Google Scholar
  37. Hermy M, Verheyen K (2007) Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. Ecol Res 22(3):361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heshmatti G, Squires VR (1997) Geobotany and range ecology: a convergence of thought? J Arid Environ 35:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hibbs DE (1983) Forty years of forest succession in central New England. Ecology 64(6):1394–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hill MO, Jones EW (1978) Vegetation changes resulting from afforestation of rough grazing in Caeo forest, south Wales. J Ecol 66:433–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (1996) Toward a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Houssard C, Escarré J, Bomane F (1980) Development of species diversity in some Mediterranean plant communities. Plant Ecol 43:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Howard LF, Lee TD (2003) Temporal patterns of vascular plant diversity in southeastern New Hampshire forests. Forest Ecol Manage 185:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hubbell SP, Foster RB, O’Brien ST, Harms KE, Condit R, Wechsler B, Wright SJ, Loo de Lao S (1999) Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science 283:554–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huston MA (1979) A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am Nat 113:81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ito S, Nakayama R, Buckley GP (2004) Effects of previous land-use on plant species diversity in semi-natural and plantation forests in a warm-temperate region in southeastern Kyushu, Japan. Forest Ecol Manage 196:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jackson RG, Foody GM, Quine CP (2000) Characterizing windthrown gaps from fine spatial resolution remotely sensed data. Forest Ecol Manage 135:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ (2003) Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. J Anim Ecol 72:367–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li CH (1997) The distribution of evergreen broad-leaved forest in East Asia. Nat Resour 2:37–46Google Scholar
  50. Liu JG (1992) Advances in modern ecology. China Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp 69–76Google Scholar
  51. Loucks OL (1970) Evolution of diversity, efficiency, and community stability. Am Zool 10(1):17–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ma KP (1994) Methods of measure on biological community diversity. I. α-diversity (1). Chin Biodivers 2:162–168Google Scholar
  53. Ma KP, Liu YM (1994) Methods of measure on biological community diversity. I. α-diversity (2). Chin Biodivers 2:231–239Google Scholar
  54. Ma KP, Liu CR, Liu YM (1995) Methods of measure on biological community diversity. II. β-diversity. Chin Biodivers 3:38–43Google Scholar
  55. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 415Google Scholar
  56. Malacska M, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Quesada M, Rivard B, Janzen DH (2004) Species composition, similarity and diversity in three successional stages of a seasonally dry tropical forest. Forest Ecol Manage 200:227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mallik AU, Robertson S (1998) Floristic composition and diversity of an old-growth White Pine forest in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. In: Man and the biosphere series, vol 21. UNESCO, Paris, pp 78–92Google Scholar
  58. Margalef R (1963) On certain unifying principles in ecology. Am Nat 97:357–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mellinger MV, McNaughton SJ (1975) Structure and function of successional vascular plant communities in central New York. Ecol Monogr 45:161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Myster RW, Pickett STA (1992) Dynamics of associations between plants in ten old fields during 31 years of succession. J Ecol 80:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Myster RW, Pickett STA (1994) A comparison of the rate of succession over 18 yr in 10 contrasting old fields. Ecology 75:387–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ohsawa M (2005) Species richness and composition of Curculionidae (Coleoptera) in a conifer plantation, secondary forest, and old-growth forest in the central mountainous region of Japan. Ecol Res 20:632–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pacala SW, Rees M (1998) Models suggesting field experiments to test two hypotheses explaining successional diversity. Am Nat 152:729–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, New York, p 326Google Scholar
  66. Pielou EC (1986) Assessing the diversity and composition of restored vegetation. Can J Bot 64:1344–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Prach K, Pysek P, Smilauer P (1993) On the rate of succession. Oikos 66:343–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rivera LW, Aide TM (1998) Forest recovery in the Karst region of Puerto Rico. Forest Ecol Manage 108:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roberts MR, Gilliam FS (1995) Disturbance effects on herb layer vegetation and soil nutrients in Populus forests of northern lower Michigan. J Veg Sci 6:903–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruben JA, Bolger DT, Peart DR, Ayres MP (1999) Understory herb assemblages 25 and 60 years after clearcutting of a northern hardwood forest, USA. Biol Conserv 90:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ruiz-Jaén MC, Aide TM (2005) Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration succession. Forest Ecol Manage 218:159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shear TH, Lent TJ, Fraver S (1996) Comparison of restored and mature bottomland hardwood forests of southwestern Kentucky. Restor Ecol 4:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stevens MHH, Carson WP (1999) Plant density determines species richness along an experimental fertility gradient. Ecology 80:455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sykes JM, Lowe VPW, Briggs DR (1989) Some effects of afforestation on the flora and fauna of an upland Sheepwalk during 12 years after planting. J Appl Ecol 26:299–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tadashi F (2005) Integrating internal and external dispersal in metacommunity assembly: preliminary theoretical analyses. Ecol Res 20:623–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tilman D (1985) The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am Nat 125:827–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van der Putten WH, Mortimer SR, Hedlund K, Van Dijk C, Brown VK, Lepä J (2000) Plant species diversity as a driver of early succession in abandoned fields: a multi-site approach. Oecologia 124:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vankat JL (1991) Floristics of a chronosequence corresponding to old field-deciduous forest succession in southwestern Ohio. IV. Intra- and inter-stand comparisons and their implications for succession mechanisms. B Torrey Bot Club 118:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wan T, Zhang JM, Pan KW (2003) Ecological function and restoration strategies of forests in the regions of evergreen broad-leaved forest in the lower and middle mountain areas in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. J Sichuan For Sci Tech 24:56–60Google Scholar
  80. Wang DP, Ji SY, Chen FP, Xing FW, Peng SL (2006) Diversity and relationship with succession of naturally regenerated southern subtropical forests in Shenzhen, China and its comparison with the zonal climax of Hong Kong. Forest Ecol Manage 222:384–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang G, Zhao SL, Zhang PY (1984) On the definition of niche and the improved formula for measuring niche overlap. Acta Ecol Sin 4:119–127Google Scholar
  82. Wang GH (2006) Can the restoration of natural vegetation be accelerated on the Chinese Loess Plateau? A study of the response of the leaf carbon isotope ratio of dominant species to changing soil carbon and nitrogen levels. Ecol Res 21:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu ZY (1980) Vegetation of China. Science Press, Beijing, pp 306–355Google Scholar
  85. Yang YP, Li CB (1992) Forest in Sichuan. China Forest Press, Beijing, pp 578–600Google Scholar
  86. Zhang JT (1995) Methods in quantitative vegetation ecology. China Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp 1–371Google Scholar
  87. Zhang JT (2005) Succession analysis of plant communities in abandoned croplands in the eastern Loess Plateau of China. J Arid Environ 63:458–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhang J, Zhao H, Zhang T, Zhao X, Drake S (2005) Community succession along a chronosequence of vegetation restoration on sand dunes in Horqin Sandy Land. J Arid Environ 62:555–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhuang P, Gao XM (2002) The concept of the Rainy Zone of West China and its significance to the biodiversity conservation in China. Biodivers Sci 10(3):339–344Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wanze Zhu
    • 1
  • Song Cheng
    • 1
  • Xiaohu Cai
    • 2
  • Fei He
    • 2
  • Jinxi Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Mountain Hazard and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.Sichuan Academy of ForestryChengduChina

Personalised recommendations