Ecological Research

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 529–542 | Cite as

Exclusive core areas and intrasexual territoriality in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) revealed by incremental cluster polygon analysis

  • Erica Di Pierro
  • Ambrogio Molinari
  • Guido Tosi
  • Lucas A. Wauters
Original Article

Abstract

When animal home ranges overlap extensively in species lacking overt territorial behaviours, identifying exclusive core areas within individual ranges can be difficult. By analysing the size and overlap of successively smaller core areas among individual Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris), we determined exclusive areas within the home ranges of resident males and females. Possible effects of habitat composition and food supplies were explored by monitoring squirrels in different conifer forests and during years with low and high tree seed production. Using outlier-exclusive cores (OEC) revealed that the total ranges consisted of large sally zones (on average, 35% of the total minimum convex polygon [MCP] range) around home ranges with multi-nucleate cores. The mean OEC home range size did not differ between the sexes but was larger with poor food availability. Home ranges (99% incremental cluster polygons [ICP]) overlapped extensively between sexes (average overlap high food–low food: males by females 21–40%, females by males 43–45%) and among males (males by males 26–44%), while intrasexual overlap among females was low (9–10%). The overlap of inner cores among females rapidly approached zero, suggesting the intrasexual territoriality of 75% core areas. This was not the case among male squirrels, for which intrasexual overlap averaged only 4% at 50% but 18% at 75% core areas. Even the smallest inner cores had some degree of intersexual overlap, indicating that complete territoriality did not occur in this species. Female home ranges were more strongly affected by annual fluctuations in food supplies than male ranges. Females reduced the size of their food-based intrasexual territories when food availability increases. Males probably benefit from using larger home ranges and core areas, which overlap with the ranges of several females, by increasing their probability of successful mating.

Keywords

Sciurus vulgaris Home ranges Core area overlap Food abundance Incremental cluster polygons 

References

  1. Andrén H, Delin A (1994) Habitat selection in the Eurasian red squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris, in relation to forest fragmentation. Oikos 70:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrén H, Lemnell P-A (1992) Population fluctuations and habitat selection in the Eurasian red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris. Ecography 15:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aragón P, López P, Martin J (2001) Chemosensory discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by lizards: implications of field spatial relationships between males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker VJ (2006) Microhabitat features influence the movements of red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) on unfamiliar ground. J Mammal 87:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker VJ, Van Vuren DH (2004) Gap-crossing decisions by the red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus), a forest-dependent small mammal. Conserv Biol 18:689–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertolino S, Wauters LA, De Bruyn L, Canestri-Trotti G (2003) Prevalence of coccidia parasites (Protozoa) in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris): effects of host phenotype and environmental factors. Oecologia 137:286–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JL, Orians GH (1970) Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:239–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryce J, Johnson PJ, MacDonald DW (2002) Can niche use in red and grey squirrels offer clues for their apparent coexistence? J Appl Ecol 39:875–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal 24:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter FL, MacMillen RE (1976) Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper. Science 194:639–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond Series B 236:339–372Google Scholar
  12. de Solla SR, Bonduriansky R, Brooks RJ (1999) Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. J Anim Ecol 68:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Getz LL, McGuire B (1993) A comparison of living singly and in male–female pairs in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Ethology 94:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurnell J (1987) The natural history of squirrels. Christopher Helm, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagen CA, Kenkel NC, Walker DJ, Baydack RK, Braun CE (2001) Fractal-based spatial analysis of radiotelemetry data. In: Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM (eds) Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp 167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hemson G, Johnson P, South A, Kenward RE, Ripley R, MacDonald D (2005) Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home-range analyses with least-squares cross-validation. J Anim Ecol 74:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ims RA (1988) Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles. Nature 335:541–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B, Szymura L (1995) Weasel population response, home range, and predation on rodents in a deciduous forest in Poland. Ecology 76:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaufmann JH (1983) On the definitions and functions of dominance and territoriality. Biol Rev 58:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kenward RE (2001) A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  21. Kenward RE, Clarke RT, Hodder KH, Walls SS (2001) Density and linkage estimators of home range: nearest-neighbor clustering defines multinuclear cores. Ecology 82:1905–1920Google Scholar
  22. Kenward RE, South A, Walls S (2003) Ranges6 v1.2: for the analysis of tracking and location data. Anatrack Ltd., Wareham, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Kernohan BJ, Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ (2001) Analysis of animal space use and movements. In: Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM (eds) Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp 125–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kerr GD, Bull CM (2006) Exclusive core areas in overlapping ranges of the sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav Ecol 17:380–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koprowski JL (1998) Conflict between the sexes: a review of social and mating systems of the tree squirrels. In: Steele MA, Merritt JF, Zegers DA (eds) Ecology and evolutionary biology of tree squirrels. Virginia Museum of Natural History, Special Publication no 6, pp 33–41Google Scholar
  26. Lair H (1987) Estimating the location of the focal center in red squirrel home ranges. Ecology 68:1092–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee TH (2001) Mating behavior of the Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris Linnaeus, 1758) in Hokkaido, Japan. Mammalia 65:131–142Google Scholar
  28. Lomnicki A (1980) Regulation of population density due to individual differences and patchy environment. Oikos 35:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lurz PWW, Garson PJ, Rushton SP (1995) The ecology of squirrels in spruce dominated plantations: implications for forest management. For Ecol Manage 79:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lurz PWW, Garson PJ, Wauters LA (1997) Effects of temporal and spatial variation in habitat quality on red squirrel dispersal behaviour. Anim Behav 54:427–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lurz PWW, Garson PJ, Wauters LA (2000) Effects of temporal and spatial variations in food supply on the space and habitat use of red squirrels, Sciurus vulgaris L. J Zool Lond 251:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahady SJ, Wolff JO (2002) A field test of the Bruce effect in the monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maher CR, Lott DF (1995) Definitions of territoriality used in the study of variation in vertebrate spacing systems. Anim Behav 49:1581–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maher CR, Lott DF (2000) A review of ecological determinants of territoriality within vertebrate species. Am Midl Nat 143:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mares MA, Lacher TE Jr (1987) Social spacing in small mammals: patterns of individual variation. Am Zool 27:293–306Google Scholar
  36. McLoughlin PD, Ferguson SH, Messier F (2000) Intraspecific variation in home range overlap with habitat quality: a comparison among brown bear populations. Evol Ecol 14:39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Molinari A, Wauters LA, Airoldi G, Cerinotti F, Martinoli A, Tosi G (2006) Cone selection by Eurasian red squirrels in mixed conifer forests in the Italian Alps. Acta Oecologica 30:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moorcroft PR, Lewis MA, Crabtree RL (1999) Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range model. Ecology 80:1656–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Münch S (1998) Populationsökologie, Aktivität, Raum- und Habitatnutzung beim Europäischen Eichhörnchen (Sciurus vulgaris L.) im Bergmischwald des Nationalparks Bayerischer Wald. PhD thesis, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  40. Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  41. Ostfeld RS (1985) Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents. Am Nat 126:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ostfeld RS (1990) The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 5:411–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parker GA, Sutherland WJ (1986) Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Anim Behav 34:1222–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Samuel MD, Pierce DJ, Garton EO (1985) Identifying areas of concentrated use within the home range. J Anim Ecol 54:711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. SAS (1999) SAS STAT user’s guide, version v.8.0. SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  46. Steele M, Wauters LA, Larsen KW (2005) Selection, predation and dispersal of seeds by tree squirrels in temperate and boreal forests: are tree squirrels keystone granivores? In: Forget J-M, Forget P-M, Lambert JE, Hulme PE, Vander Wall SB (eds) Seed fate: predation, dispersal, and seedling establishment. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 205–221Google Scholar
  47. Steury TD, Murray DL (2003) Causes and consequences of individual variation in territory size in the American red squirrel. Oikos 101:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swihart RK, Slade NA (1985) Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 66:1176–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trizio I, Crestanello B, Galbusera P, Wauters LA, Tosi G, Matthysen E, Hauffe HC (2005) Geographical distance and physical barriers shape the genetic structure of Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in the Italian Alps. Mol Ecol 14:469–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer series in statistics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Wauters LA, Dhondt AA, (1987) Activity budget and foraging behaviour of the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris Linnaeus, 1758) in a coniferous habitat. Z Säugetierkd 52:341–353Google Scholar
  52. Wauters LA, Dhondt AA (1989) Body weight, longevity and reproductive success in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris). J Anim Ecol 58:637–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wauters LA, Dhondt AA (1990) Nest-use by red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris Linnaeus, 1758). Mammalia 54:377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wauters LA, Dhondt AA (1992) Spacing behaviour of red squirrels, Sciurus vulgaris: variation between habitats and the sexes. Anim Behav 43:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wauters LA, Dhondt AA (1993) Immigration patterns and success in red squirrels. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wauters LA, Dhondt AA (1995) Lifetime reproductive success and its correlates in female Eurasian red squirrels. Oikos 72:402–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wauters LA, Dhondt AA (1998) Variation in spacing behavior of Eurasian red squirrels, Sciurus vulgaris: effects of density and food. In: Steele MA, Merritt JF, Zegers D (eds) Ecology and evolutionary biology of tree squirrels. Virginia Museum of Natural History, Special Publication no 6, pp 71–78Google Scholar
  58. Wauters LA, Gurnell J (1999) The mechanism of replacement of red squirrels by grey squirrels: a test of the interference competition hypothesis. Ethology 105:1053–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wauters LA, De Vos R, Dhondt AA (1990) Factors affecting male mating success in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris). Ethol Ecol Evol 2:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wauters LA, Swinnen C., Dhondt AA (1992) Activity budget and foraging behaviour of red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in coniferous and deciduous habitats. J Zool 1:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wauters LA, Casale P, Dhondt AA (1994) Space use and dispersal of red squirrels in fragmented habitats. Oikos 69:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wauters LA, Lens L, Dhondt AA (1995) Variation in territory fidelity and territory shifts among red squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris, females. Anim Behav 49:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wauters LA, Lurz PWW, Gurnell J (2000) Interspecific effects of grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) on the space use and population demography of red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in conifer plantations. Ecol Res 15:271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wauters LA, Gurnell J, Preatoni D, Tosi G (2001) Effects of spatial variation in food availability on spacing behaviour and demography of Eurasian red squirrels. Ecography 24:525–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wauters LA, Zaninetti M, Tosi G, Bertolino S (2004) Is coat-colour polymorphism in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris L.) adaptive? Mammalia 68:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wauters LA, Bertolino S, Adamo M, Van Dongen S, Tosi G (2005) Food shortage disrupts social organization: the case of red squirrels in conifer forests. Evol Ecol 19:375–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wauters LA, Preatoni D, Molinari A, Tosi G (2007) Radio-tracking squirrels: performance of home range density and linkage estimators with small range and sample size. Ecol Modelling 202:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  69. Zalewski A, Jedrzejewski W (2006) Spatial organisation and dynamics of the pine marten Martes martes population in Bialowieza Forest (E Poland) compared with other European woodlands. Ecography 29:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zscheile K (1995) Zur Ökologie des Europäischen Eichhörnchens Sciurus vulgaris L.,1758 und seiner Verbreitung in den östlichen Bundesländern Deutschlands. Diplom Arbeit, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica Di Pierro
    • 1
  • Ambrogio Molinari
    • 1
  • Guido Tosi
    • 1
  • Lucas A. Wauters
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environment, Health, and SafetyUniversity of Insubria VareseVarese (VA)Italy

Personalised recommendations