Abstract
Changes in plant biomass allocation in response to varying resource availabilities may result from ontogenetic drift caused by allometric growth (i.e., apparent plasticity), a true adjustment of ontogenetic trajectories (true plasticity) or both (complex plasticity). Given that the root allocation of annual species usually decreases during the growth, the developmentally explicit model predicts that annual herbs will exhibit true plasticity in root allocation under above-ground resource limitation and apparent plasticity for moderate stress of below-ground resource. For perennial species, the root allocation of which increases during growth, the reverse patterns would be expected. In this study, we tested the developmentally explicit model with a perennial weed, Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. We report its adaptive changes and ontogenetic drift of root allocation in response to different resource levels (i.e., light, water and nutrient availability) by comparing root allocation on both an age and a size basis. The root allocation of A. philoxeroides increased with the size (i.e., ontogenetic drift) during the growth, and exhibited significant changes in response to different resource availabilities. Furthermore, the root allocation in response to water or nutrient availability exhibited typical complex plasticity, while the light stress only slowed down the growth, with the ontogenetic trajectory unchanged (apparent plasticity). The contrasting responses to above-ground and below-ground stresses were consistent with the prediction of the developmentally explicit model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloom A, Chapin FI, Mooney H (1985) Resource limitation in plants: an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:363–392
Bond BJ (2000) Age-related changes in photosynthesis of woody plants. Trends Plant Sci 5:349–353
Coleman JS, McConnaughay KDM (1995) A non-functional interpretation of a classical optimal-partitioning example. Funct Ecol 9:951–954
Coleman JS, McConnaughay KDM, Ackerly DD (1994) Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. Trends Ecol Evolut 9:187–191
Evans GC (1972) The quantitative analysis of plant growth. University of California Press, California
Gebauer RLE, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1996) Allometric relations and growth in Pinus taeda: the effect of elevated CO2 and changing N availability. New Phytol 134:85–93
Gedroc JJ, McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS (1996) Plasticity in root shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Funct Ecol 10:44–50
Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester
Hirose T (1987) A vegetative plant growth model: adaptive significance of phenotypic plasticity in matter partitioning. Funct Ecol 1:195–202
Hunt R (1990) Basic growth analysis. Unwin Hyman, London
Julien MH, Skarratt B, Maywald GF (1995) Potential geographical distribution of alligator weed and its biological control by Agasicles hygrophila. J Aquat Plant Manage 33:55–60
Kokoska SM, Johnson LB (1987) A comparison of statistical techniques for analysis of growth curves. Growth 51:261–269
Ledig FT, Bormann FH, Wenger KF (1970) The distribution of dry matter growth between shoot and roots in loblolly pines. Bot Gaz 131:349–359
Li Y (1998) China flora of weeds (in Chinese). Chinese Agricultural Press, Beijing
McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS (1999) Biomass allocation in plants: Ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80:2581–2593
Mead R, Curnow RN (1983) Statistical methods in agriculture and experimental biology. Chapman and Hall, London
Moriuchi K, Winn A (2005) Relationships among growth, development and plastic response to environment quality in a perennial plant. New Phytol 166:149–158
Niinemets U (2004) Adaptive adjustments to light in foliage and whole-plant characteristics depend on relative age in the perennial herb Leontodon hispidus. New Phytol 162:683–696
Osone Y, Tateno M (2005) Applicability and limitations of optimal biomass allocation models: a test of two species from fertile and infertile habitats. Ann Bot 95:1211–1220
Pigliucci M, Schlichting CD (1995) Ontogenetic reaction norms in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae): response to shading. Ecology 76:2134–2144
Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:595–607
Potvin C, Lechnwicz MJ, Tardif S (1990) The statistical analysis of ecological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measures. Ecology 71:1389–1400
Rice SA, Bazzaz FA (1989a) Growth consequences of plasticity of plant traits in response to light conditions. Oecologia 78:508–512
Rice SA, Bazzaz FA (1989b) Quantification of plasticity of plant traits in response to light intensity: comparing phenotypes at a common weight. Oecologia 78:502–507
Schmid B, Weiner J (1993) Plastic relationships between reproductive and vegetative mass in Solidago altissima. Evolution 47:61–74
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sultan SE (2000) Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci 5:537–542
Suzuki J, Hara T (2001) Partitioning of stored resources between shoots in a clone, and its effects on shoot size hierarchy. Ann Bot 87:655–659
Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Weiner J (2004) Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evolut Syst 6:207–215
Wright SD, McConnaughay KDM (2002) Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny. Plant Species Biol 17:119–131
Zhang XY, Ye YZ, Zhang XP, Li DY, Du WB (2004) The reproductive and invasive characteristics of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Henan Sci 22:60–62
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Changming Fang for helpful comments and Guillaume Neault of Queen’s University for improving the English. We also thank Xuan Zhou and Han Gao for help with the harvest. This study was financially supported by 863 project of China, grant number: 2003AA06011000-4-03.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Geng, YP., Pan, XY., Xu, CY. et al. Plasticity and ontogenetic drift of biomass allocation in response to above- and below-ground resource availabilities in perennial herbs: a case study of Alternanthera philoxeroides . Ecol Res 22, 255–260 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0017-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0017-9