Abstract
Objective
To investigate the relationship between the maxillary sinus ostium 2D area (SOA) and the development of mucosal cysts of the maxillary sinus (MMC).
Methods
Thirty patients (≥ 18 years) with unilateral MMC who underwent paranasal sinus CT (PNsCT) were included in this single-center retrospective study. Non-MMC sinus was used as the control group. Cyst and air volume of the maxillary sinuses, diameter, and 2-dimensional area of the ostium of the patients were calculated in the 3-dimensional volumetric analysis program. Both correlation and linear regression model analyses were performed for the relationship between MMC and SOA.
Results
Thirty patients were included (mean age of 42.30 ± 17.62 years). A total of 15/30 (50%) were male. The mean SOA in patients with MMC (8.91 ± 1.10 mm2) was lower than in patients without MMC (12.94 ± 1.35 mm2), which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean sinus ostium diameter in patients with MMC (2.12 ± 0.71 mm) was higher than in patients without MMC (1.91 ± 0.82 mm), which was statistically insignificant (p = 0.295). There was a statistically significant, good level of negative linear correlation between SOA and total cyst volume (TCV) [correlation coefficient (r) = – 0.680, p < 0.001]). As a result, the regression model consisting of "Age, Sinus air volume, and TCV" variables is a good model and has statistically significant relations with SOA.
Conclusion
In conclusion, small SOAs contribute to the development of MMC. There was a negative correlation between SOA and TCV. In addition, 2D area measurement may be a more accurate method instead of diameter measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [ATK].
References
Bhattacharyya N. Do maxillary sinus retention cysts reflect obstructive sinus phenomena? Arch Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1369–71.
Giotakis EI, Weber RK. Cysts of the maxillary sinus: A literature review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3:766–71.
Harar RPS, Chadha NK, Rogers G. Are maxillary mucosal cysts a manifestation of inflammatory sinus disease? J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121:751–4.
Arslan IB, Uluyol S, Demirhan E, Kozcu SH, Pekcevik Y, Cukurova I. Paranasal sinus anatomic variations accompanying maxillary sinus retention cysts: a radiological analysis. Turk Otolarengoloji Arsivi/Turkish Arch Otolaryngol. 2017;55:162–5.
Kanagalingam J, Bhatia K, Georgalas C, Fokkens W, Miszkiel K, Lund VJ. Maxillary mucosal cyst is not a manifestation of rhinosinusitis: Results of a prospective three-dimensional CT study of ophthalmic patients. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:8–12.
Moon IJ, Kim SW, Han DH, Shin JM, Rhee CS, Lee CH, et al. Mucosal cysts in the paranasal sinuses: Long-term follow-up and clinical implications. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011;25:98–102.
Gotwald TF, Zinreich SJ, Corl F, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional volumetric display of the nasal ostiomeatal channels and paranasal sinuses. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:241–5.
Carmeli G, Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Segev Y, Landsberg R. Antral computerized tomography pre-operative evaluation: relationship between mucosal thickening and maxillary sinus function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:78–82.
Nouraei SAR, Elisay AR, Dimarco A, Abdi R, Majidi H, Madani SA, et al. Variations in paranasal sinus anatomy: implications for the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis and safety of endoscopic sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg Le J d’oto-rhino-laryngologie Chir cervico-faciale. 2009;38:32–7.
Vaid S, Vaid N. Normal anatomy and anatomic variants of the paranasal sinuses on computed tomography. Neuroimaging Clin. 2015;25:527–48.
Elahi MM, Frenkiel S, Fageeh N. Paraseptal structural changes and chronic sinus disease in relation to the deviated septum. J Otolaryngol. 1997;26:236–40.
Aksoy U, Orhan K. Association between odontogenic conditions and maxillary sinus mucosal thickening: a retrospective CBCT study. Clin Oral Investig Clinical Oral Investig. 2019;23:123–31.
Wang JH, Jang YJ, Lee B. Natural course of retention cysts of the maxillary sinus: long-term follow-up results. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:341–4.
Omezli MM, Torul D, Cankaya S. Frequency and characteristics of retention cysts in the maxillary sinus in a Turkish patient population. Int J Stomatol Occlusion Med. 2015;8:17–21.
Jalisi S, Seo S, Lee M, Mardirossian V. Carcinoma cuniculatum of the oral cavity: a histological and clinical dilemma. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:8.
Abesi F, Mirshekar AR, Babaee N, Heidari H, Mohammadzadeh I. Prevalence of mucous retention cysts of maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2013;15:103–7.
Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S, Soikkonen K, Norblad A. Prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus and their relationship to dental disease in panoramic radiography: results from the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2010;109:e80–7.
White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology-E-book: principles and interpretation. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
Mafee MF, Valvassori GE, Becker M. Imaging of the head and neck. (No Title). 2005.
Tassoker M, Magat G, Lale B, Gulec M, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Is the maxillary sinus volume affected by concha bullosa, nasal septal deviation, and impacted teeth? A CBCT study Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2020;277:227–33.
Smith KD, Edwards PC, Saini TS, Norton NS. The prevalence of concha bullosa and nasal septal deviation and their relationship to maxillary sinusitis by volumetric tomography. Int J Dent. 2010;2010:1–5.
Cohen NA. Sinonasal mucociliary clearance in health and disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115:20–6.
Beule AG. Physiology and pathophysiology of respiratory mucosa of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;9:15–34.
Yenigun A, Fazliogullari Z, Gun C, Uysal II, Nayman A, Karabulut AK. The effect of the presence of the accessory maxillary ostium on the maxillary sinus. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2016;273:4315–9.
Albu S. Symptomatic maxillary sinus retention cysts: should they be removed? Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1904–9.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ATK: Methodology. ATK, LV: Formal analysis and investigation. ATK: Writing—original draft preparation. ATK, LV: Writing—review and editing. ATK, LV: Supervision. All of the authors declare that they have all participated in the design, execution, and analysis of the paper and that they have approved the final version
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
In this study, there were no competing interests or financial benefits to the authors.
Ethical approval
This retrospective and the single-center study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Amasya University Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Training and Research Hospital 6 September 2022, number: 94). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
The study is retrospective, patient information was obtained from electronic records and censored. Since the study was retrospective, the ethics committee did not find it necessary to obtain written informed consent from the patients.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaya, A.T., Uğur, L. Relationship between maxillary sinus mucosal cyst and sinus ostium 2D area in three-dimensional volumetric paranasal CT ımages. Oral Radiol 40, 199–206 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00722-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00722-6