Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Awareness and practice of dentomaxillofacial imaging among paediatric dentists: a questionnaire survey of members of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Assess knowledge, attitudes and practices of paediatric dentists towards dentomaxillofacial imaging and correlate findings with practitioner and practice-specific characteristics.

Methods

An online questionnaire was sent to all paediatric dentists who attended a scientific seminar organized by the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) regarding dental radiology. Data regarding available equipment, number, type and reason for performing radiographs, frequency and reasoning for retakes were collected. Data analysis was performed according to practitioner- and practice-specific characteristics and factors directly associated with the type and frequency of radiographs taken, and reason and frequency of repeats were determined. Significant differences were tested using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

More than half of the participants (58%) reported having digital radiographic equipment and almost 1/4 (23%) conventional. A panoramic equipment was available in 39% working places and a CBCT scanner in 41%. Two thirds of the participants reported taking up to 10 intra-oral radiographs per week, mainly for trauma (75%) and caries diagnosis (47%). Extra-oral radiographs were prescribed to monitor development (75%) and for orthodontic evaluation, (63%) with a frequency of less than 5 weekly (45%). Participants reported that they repeat radiographs in a frequency of < 5 per week (70%) mainly due to patient’s movement (55%).

Conclusions

The majority of paediatric dentists within Europe use digital imaging equipment for both intra- and extra-oral radiographs. Nevertheless, great variation in practices exists and, therefore, continuous education in oral imaging is crucial to maintain high quality standards for the radiographic examination of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. Radiographic equipment and techniques used in general dental practice: a survey of general dental practitioners in England and Wales. J Dent. 2003;31:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, et al. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:219–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rout J, Brown J. Ionizing radiation regulations and the dental practitioner: 1. The nature of ionizing radiation and its use in dentistry. Dent Update. 2012;39:191–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal MS, Spyridonos ML, Rajasekharan S, Sobczak M, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21:375–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ihle IR, Neibling E, Albrecht K, Treston H, Sholapurkar A. Investigation of radiation-protection knowledge, attitudes, and practices of North Queensland dentists. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10(1): e12374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonetti D, Pitts NB, Eccles M, et al. Applying psychological theory to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of taking intra-oral radiographs. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:1889–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert GH, Weems RA, Litaker MS, Shelton BJ. Practice characteristics associated with patient-specific receipt of dental diagnostic radiographs. Health Serv Res. 2006;41:1915–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Aspects of panoramic radiography in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 1999;186:342–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Svenson B, Soderfeldt B, Grondahl HG. Attitudes of Swedish dentists to the choice of dental x-ray film and collimator for oral radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996;25:157–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bohay RN, Stephens RG, Kogon SL. Radiographic examination of children: a survey of prescribing practices of general dentists. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79:641–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohay RN, Kogon SL, Stephens RG. A survey of radiographic techniques and equipment used by a sample of general dental practitioners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78:806–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanton ML. Longitudinal trends in the use of individualized radiographic examinations at dental schools in the United States and Canada. J Dent Educ. 2006;70:160–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kantor ML. Use of radiology practice guidelines and compliance with accreditation standards in United States and Canadian dental schools. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1532–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hintze H. Radiographic screening examination: frequency, equipment, and film in general dental practice in Denmark. Scand J Dent Res. 1993;101:52–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee BD, Ludlow JB. Attitude of the Korean dentists towards radiation safety and selection criteria. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43:179–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Svenson B, Ståhlnacke K, Karlsson R, Fält A. Dentists’ use of digital radiographic techniques: part I–intraoral x-ray: a questionnaire study of Swedish dentists. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018;76:111–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aravind BS, Joy ET, Kiran MS, Sherubin JE, Sajesh S, Manchil PR. Attitude and awareness of general practitioners toward radiation hazards and safety. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8(Suppl 1):S54–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gijbels F, Dabaveye D, Vanderstappen M, Jacobs R. Digital radiographic equipment in the Belgian dental office. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117:309–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobs R, Vanderstappen M, Bogaerts R, Gijbels F. Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:334–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berkhout WER, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32:124–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berkhout WER, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:93–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anissi HD, Geibel MA. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices -a comparison of digital and film-based x-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction. Rofo. 2014;186:762–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miles DA, Razzano MR. The future of digital imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2000;44:427–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yeung AWK, Tanaka R, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM. Awareness and practice of 2D and 3D diagnostic imaging among dentists in Hong Kong. Br Dent J. 2020;228:701–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Snel R, Van De Maele E, Politis C, Jacobs R. Digital dental radiology in Belgium: a nationwide survey. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018;47:20180045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Aps J. Flemish general dental practitioners’ knowledge of dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:113–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Svenson B, Ståhlnacke K, Karlsson R, Fält A. Dentists’ use of digital radiographic techniques: part II - extraoral radiography: a questionnaire study of Swedish dentists. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77:150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30:203–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hol C, Hellen-Halme K, Torgersen G, Nilsson M, Møystad A. How do dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73:195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mauthe PW, Eaton KA. An investigation into dental digital radiography in dental practices in West Kent following the introduction of the 2006 NHS general dental services contract. Prim Dent Care. 2011;18:73–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Davies C, Grange S, Trevor M. Radiation protection practices and related continuing professional education in dental radiography: a survey of practitioners in the North-east of England. Radiography. 2005;11:255–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. An SY, Lee KM, Lee JS. Korean dentists’ perceptions and attitudes regarding radiation safety and protection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018;47:20170228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yeung AWK, Wong NSM. Reject rates of radiographic images in Dentomaxillofacial radiology: a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:8076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer VM, Benjamens S, Moumni ME, Lange JFM, Pol RA. Global overview of response rates in patient and health care professional surveys in surgery. Ann Surg. 2022;1(275):e75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck CA, Dixon E, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no funding for the current work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sotiria Gizani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed consent

Informed consent to participate was obtained from participants by completing the anonymous questionnaire from which no personally identifiable data could be acquired.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gizani, S., Seremidi, K., Gkourtsogianni, S. et al. Awareness and practice of dentomaxillofacial imaging among paediatric dentists: a questionnaire survey of members of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Oral Radiol 39, 576–587 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00675-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00675-w

Keywords

Navigation