Advertisement

Morphology, incidence of bridging, and dimensions of sella turcica in different racial groups

  • Fenik Kaml Muhammed
  • Adil O. Abdullah
  • Zhwan Jamal Rashid
  • Tamara Pusic
  • Mohammed F. Shbair
  • Yi Liu
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

This study was performed to assess the morphological appearance, incidence of bridging, and linear dimensions of the sella turcica (ST) in Bosnian and Iraqi subjects, and to identify associations of sex, age, and racial group with the size of the ST.

Methods

The digital standardised lateral cephalograms of 360 Bosnian and Iraqi patients (116 female, 64 male; age range 8–28 years) were retrospectively analysed. The following ST-related parameters were analysed on the lateral cephalograms: sella morphology, sella bridging, and sella size. The data were correlated with sex, age, and race.

Results

The ST exhibited a normal morphology in most subjects of both races (86.7%). The frequency of partial bridging was found in 38.9 and 37.2% of Bosnian and Iraqi subjects, respectively. A significant correlation was detected between the length of the ST and sex in both the Bosnian and Iraqi subjects (p < 0.05). A direct correlation was present between patient age and the size of the ST in both races at the 0.01 and 0.001 levels for depth, length, and diameter. When race was compared with sella size, a significant difference was found in the length and depth of the ST (p <  0.001).

Conclusions

Similarities were found between Bosnian and Iraqi subjects in the morphology, incidence of bridging, and linear dimensions of the ST. Length was the only parameter significantly associated with sex, age, and racial group. These findings could be used as reference standards for studying the ST in both races.

Keywords

Sella turcica Sella shape Sella bridging Bosnian Iraqi 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) under Grant number CSC-2016368012.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Fenik Kaml Muhammed, Adil O. Abdullah, Zhwan Jamal Rashid, Tamara Pusic, Mohammed F. Shbair, and Yi Liu declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. The study protocol was approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee of Stomatology of China Medical University (Shenyang, People’s Republic of China). This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not needed in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Alkofide EA. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal class I, class II, and class III Saudi subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(5):457–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tekiner H, Acer N, Kelestimur F. Sella turcica: an anatomical, endocrinological, and historical perspective. Pituitary. 2015;18(4):575–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neha SM, Shetty VS, Shetty S. Sella size and jaw bases—is there a correlation? Cont Clin Dent. 2016;7(1):61–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marsan G, Oztas E. Incidence of bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in class I and III Turkish adult female patients. World J Orthod. 2009;10(2):99–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norton N. Netter’s head and neck anatomy for dentistry. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iván E, Pérez I, Allison K, Chávez A, Ponce D. Frequency of sella turcica bridge and clinoid enlargement in lateral cephalometric plain film radiography from Peruvians. Int J Morphol. 2013;31(2):373–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hasan HA, Alam MK, Abdullah YJ, Nakano J, Yusa T, Yusof A, et al. 3DCT morphometric analysis of sella turcica in Iraqi population. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2016;25(3):227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abdel-Kader HM. Sella turcica bridges in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. A retrospective cephalometric study. Au Orthod J. 2007;23(1):30–5.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keats T, Lusted L. Atlas of roentgenographic measurement. St. Louis: Mosby; 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedland B, Meazzini MC. Incidental finding of an enlarged sella turcica on a lateral cephalogram. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;110(5):508–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peker T, Anil A, Gulekon N, Turgut HB, Pelin C, Karakose M. The incidence and types of sella and sphenopetrous bridges. Neuro Rev. 2006;29(3):219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjaer I. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with severe craniofacial deviations. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22(1):69–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, Caltabiano M. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with dental anomalies. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28(6):580–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shah AM, Bashir U, Ilyas T. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal class I, II and III in patients presenting at Islamic International Dental Hospital, Islamabad. Pakistan Oral Dent J. 2011;31(1):104–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valizadeh S, Shahbeig S, Mohseni S, Azimi F, Bakhshandeh H. Correlation of shape and size of sella turcica with the type of facial skeletal class in an Iranian group. Iranian J Radiol. 2015;12(3):e16059.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sathyanarayana H, Kailasam V, Chitharanjan A. The size and morphology of sella turcica in different skeletal patterns among South Indian population: a lateral cephalometric study. J In Orthod Soc. 2013;47(4):266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hussein S, Noori A. Prevalence of oral mucosal changes among 13 year old children in Sulaimani city, Iraq. Sulaimani Dent J. 2014;1:5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lakic B, Racic M, Vulic D. Retrospective analysis of the role and performance of family medicine versus emergency medical services in the pre-hospital management of patients with AMI in Banja Luka. Acta Med Acad. 2016;45(1):10–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chang ZC, Hu FC, Lai E, Yao CC, Chen MH, Chen YJ. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 2011;140(6):e289–e97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Damstra J, Huddleston Slater JJ, Fourie Z, Ren Y. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 2010;138(5):546.e541–8 (discussion 546–7).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Silverman F. Roentgen standards for size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. Am J Roentgenol. 1957;78(3):45–60.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hasan H, Alam M, Yusof A, Mizushima H, Kida A, Osuga N. Size and morphology of sella turcica in Malay populations: a 3D CT study. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2016;25(3):313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    IPérez I, Chávez A, Ponce D. Frequency of sella turcica bridge and clinoid enlargement in lateral cephalometric plain film radiography from Peruvians. Int J Morphol. 2013;31(2):373–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koo T, Li M. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Andredaki M, Koumantanou A, Dorotheou D, Halazonetis DJ. A cephalometric morphometric study of the sella turcica. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(5):449–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ruiz C, Wafae N, Wafae G. Sella turcica morphometry using computed tomography. Eur J Anat. 2008;12:47–50.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(6):597–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cederberg RA, Benson BW, Nunn M, English JD. Calcification of the interclinoid and petroclinoid ligaments of sella turcica: a radiographic study of the prevalence. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(4):227–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kantor ML, Norton LA. Normal radiographic anatomy and common anomalies seen in cephalometric films. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 1987;91(5):414–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meyer-Marcotty P, Weisschuh N, Dressler P, Hartmann J, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Morphology of the sella turcica in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome with PITX2 mutation. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008;37(8):504–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Islam M, Alam M, Yusof A, Kato I, Honda Y, Kubo K, et al. 3D CT study of morphological shape and size of sella turcica in Bangladeshi population. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2017;26(1):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica in Williams syndrome. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(6):613–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jones RM, Faqir A, Millett DT, Moos KF, McHugh S. Bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in subjects treated by surgical-orthodontic means or orthodontics only. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(5):714–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Olubunmi O, Yinka O, Oladele O, Adimchukwunaka G, Afees O. An assessment of the size of sella turcica among adult Nigerians resident in Lagos. Int J Med Imaging. 2016;4(3):12–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Osunwoke E, Mokwe C, Amah-Tariah F. Radiologic measurements of the sella turcica in an adult Nigerian population. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2014;4:115–7.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chavan S, Kathole M, Katti A, Herekar N. Radiological analysis of sella turcica. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2012;4(1):36–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthodontics, School of StomatologyChina Medical UniversityShenyangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Stomatology Key Laboratory Research Center, School and Hospital of StomatologyChina Medical UniversityShenyangPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Orthodontics, School of DentistryThe University of SulaimaniSulaimaniIraq
  4. 4.Private ClinicBanja Luka, BosniaBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations