Advertisement

Oral Radiology

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 127–135 | Cite as

Craniofacial cephalometric morphologies in different cleft types: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 212 patients

  • Ana López-Giménez
  • Javier Silvestre-Rangil
  • Francisco-Javier Silvestre
  • Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the craniofacial cephalometric morphologies among different cleft types in a Spanish population.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 212 patients. The patients were subdivided into four groups according to their cleft types: unilateral cleft lip and palate; bilateral cleft lip and palate; cleft lip; and cleft palate. Angular and linear cephalometric measurements were taken on lateral radiographs.

Results

Unilateral cleft lip and palate was associated with a dolichofacial growth pattern, skeletal Class III with correct maxillary position, and lingual incisor inclination. Bilateral cleft lip and palate was associated with a mesofacial growth pattern, skeletal Class I with protruded maxillary position, and lingual incisor inclination. Cleft palate was associated with a mesofacial growth pattern, skeletal Class III with correct maxillary position, and lingual incisor inclination. Cleft lip was associated with a brachyfacial growth pattern, skeletal Class I with protruded maxillary position, lingual upper incisor inclination, and corrects lower incisor inclination. Significant correlations were observed between cleft types and their craniofacial cephalometric measurements.

Conclusions

The present information can be used for the determination of orthodontic treatment and even future orthognathic surgery planning, a requirement in most cleft patients.

Keywords

Unilateral cleft lip and palate Bilateral cleft lip and palate Cleft lip Cleft palate Developmental anomaly 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank William James Packer for translating the manuscript into English.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Ana López-Giménez, Javier Silvestre-Rangil, Francisco-Javier Silvestre, and Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statements

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Holst A, Holst S, Nkenke E, Fenner M, Hirschfelder U. Vertical and sagittal growth in patients with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate—a retrospective cephalometric evaluation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46:512–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toro-Ibacache V, Araya JC, Muñoz AD, Manríquez SG. Morphologic variability of nonsyndromic operated patients affected by cleft lip and palate: a geometric morphometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;146:346–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gesch D, Kirbschus A, Mack F, Gedrange T. Comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate with and without secondary osteoplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34:62–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goyenc YB, Gurel HG, Memili B. Craniofacial morphology in children with operated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:1396–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liao YF, Prasad NK, Chiu YT, Yun C, Chen PK. Cleft size at the time of palate repair in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate as an indicator of maxillary growth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:956–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiu YT, Liao YF, Chen PK. Initial cleft severity and maxillary growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;140:189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Russell K, Hathaway R, Dugas G, Long RE, et al. The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 3. Analysis of craniofacial form. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48:252–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    David DJ, Smith I, Nugent M, Richards C, Anderson PJ. From birth to maturity: a group of patients who have completed their protocol management. Part III. Bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:475–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu R, Lu D, Wamalwa P, Li C, Hu H, Zou S. Craniofacial morphology characteristics of operated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients in mixed dentition. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:e16–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abuhijleh E, Aydemir H, Toygar-Memikoğlu U. Three-dimensional craniofacial morphology in unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Oral Sci. 2014;56:165–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van den Dungen GM, Ongkosuwito EM, Aartman IH, Prahl-Andersen B. Craniofacial morphology of Dutch patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate and noncleft controls at the age of 15 years. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45:661–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hermann NV, Darvann TA, Jensen BL, Dahl E, Bolund S, Kreiborg S. Early craniofacial morphology and growth in children with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41:424–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartzela TN, Katsaros C, Bronkhorst EM, Rizell S, Halazonetis D, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A two-centre study on facial morphology in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate at nine years of age. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:782–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nandlal B, Utreja A, Tewari A, Chari PS. Sagittal craniofacial morphology in repaired unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate cases. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1996;14:45–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bishara SE. Cephalometric evaluation of facial growth in operated and non-operated individuals with isolated clefts of the palate. Cleft Palate J. 1973;10:239–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dahl E, Kreiborg S, Jensen BL, Fogh-Andersen P. Comparison of craniofacial morphology in infants with incomplete cleft lip and infants with isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1982;19:258–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smahel Z, Hradiský D, Müllerová Z. Multivariate comparison of craniofacial morphology in different types of facial clefts. Acta Chir Plast. 1999;41:59–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ricketts RM. Foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod. 1960;46:330–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tweed CH. The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:651–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacobson A. The, “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67:125–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dahl E. Craniofacial morphology in congenital clefts of the lip and palate. An x-ray cephalometric study of young adult males. Acta Odontol Scand. 1970;28(Suppl 57):11.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ishiguro K, Krogman WM, Mazaheri M, Harding RL. A longitudinal study of morphological craniofacial patterns via P-A x-ray headfilms in cleft patients from birth to six years of age. Cleft Palate J. 1976;13:104–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:22–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shibasaki Y, Ross RB. Facial growth in children with isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1969;6:290–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dogan S, Oncag G, Akin Y. Craniofacial development in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44:28–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bartzela T, Katsaros C, Rønning E, Rizell S, Semb G, Bronkhorst E, et al. A longitudinal three-center study of craniofacial morphology at 6 and 12 years of age in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:1313–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana López-Giménez
    • 1
  • Javier Silvestre-Rangil
    • 2
  • Francisco-Javier Silvestre
    • 2
  • Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
    • 3
  1. 1.Nen Déu HospitalBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Stomatology Department, Special Care DentistryUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Stomatology Department, OrthodonticsUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations