Skip to main content
Log in

Stability of voxel values in cone-beam computed tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Measurements of jaw bone density are important for dental implants, and stable voxel values in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dental use are necessary for their evaluation. The purpose of this study was to clarify the stability of voxel values in CBCT.

Methods

Cylindrical phantoms composed of the same material were set at the median anterior region and left and right first molar regions of an acrylic vessel filled with water. Three kinds of cylindrical phantoms made of polyvinyl chloride, polyacetal polyoxymethylene, and polycarbonate were evaluated. CBCT images were obtained using Alphard VEGA and 3D eXam i systems. Circular regions of interest were superoinferiorly set at five levels, and the voxel values were averaged. The mean differences were calculated on the basis of the voxel values at a central level of the anterior region.

Results

The mean voxel values for polyvinyl chloride, polyacetal polyoxymethylene, polycarbonate, and water were 1057, 293, 137, and 102 in Alphard VEGA and 554, 48, −127, and −202 in 3D eXam i, respectively. There were significant differences between sites and levels in Alphard VEGA and between sites in 3D eXam i. The mean differences for polyvinyl chloride, polyacetal polyoxymethylene, polycarbonate, and water were 73, 24, 18, and 18 in Alphard VEGA and 72, 49, 43, and 40 in 3D eXam i, respectively.

Conclusions

The mean differences for polyvinyl chloride, close to the cortical bone density, were larger than those for polyacetal polyoxymethylene, polycarbonate, and water in Alphard VEGA and 3D eXam i.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:245–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible: a case report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:539–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Mitsuya S, Kamemoto H, Ariji E. Measurement of mandibles with micro focus X-ray computerized tomography and compact computerized tomography for dental use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:239–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:155–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:289–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e25–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Araryarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:416–24.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:503–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17:205–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Noujeim M, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, et al. Image artifact in dental cone-beam CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:652–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Prospective study to estimate mandibular cancellous bone density using large-volume cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1309–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:829–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:420–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. I. Morita from the Department of Preventive Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University for performing the statistical analyses.

Conflict of interest

Munetaka Naitoh, Hidetoshi Aimiya, Kazuhiko Nakata, Kenichi Gotoh, and Eiichiro Ariji declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munetaka Naitoh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naitoh, M., Aimiya, H., Nakata, K. et al. Stability of voxel values in cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 30, 147–152 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-013-0152-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-013-0152-2

Keywords

Navigation