Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical characteristics of non-syndromic supernumerary teeth in a cohort of Turkish patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the frequency, prevalence, distribution, sex differences and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a referred non-syndromic Turkish population.

Methods

A total of 5200 panoramic radiographs of patients who presented at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology from July 2008 to August 2010 were evaluated. Demographic variables (age and sex), location, morphology, classification, number of supernumerary teeth, distribution, side and eruption status of supernumerary teeth as well as the management approach were evaluated for each patient with supernumerary teeth. Complications and pathological conditions were also recorded.

Results

Among the 5200 patients, 116 supernumerary teeth were found in 83 patients. These 83 patients comprised 48 males and 35 females, giving a ratio of 1.4:1. The average number of impacted teeth per person was 1.4. Parapremolar teeth (43.1%) were the most frequently observed supernumerary teeth, followed by distomolar teeth (31%), mesiodens (19.8%), paramolar teeth (2.6%), lateral incisors (2.6%) and canines (0.9%).

Conclusion

Supernumerary teeth had a prevalence of 1.6%, with parapremolar teeth being the most common supernumerary teeth in a Turkish population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garvey MT, Barry HJ, Blake M. Supernumerary teeth—an overview of classification, diagnosis and management. J Can Dent Assoc. 1999;65:612–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Esenlik E, Sayin ÖM, Atilla OA, Özen T, Altun C, Başak F. Supernumerary teeth in a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:848–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheiner MA, Sampson JW. Supernumerary teeth: a review of the literature and four case reports. Aust Dent J. 1997;42:160–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell AK, Folwarczna AM. Mesiodens—diagnosis and management of a common supernumerary tooth. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:362–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kökten G, Balcioğlu H, Buyukertan M. Supernumerary fourth and fifth molars: a report of two cases. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003;4:67–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grimanis GA, Kyriakides AT, Spyropoulos ND. A survey on supernumerary molars. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:989–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anthonappa PR, Omer MSR, King MN. Characteristics of 283 supernumerary teeth in southern Chinese children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:e48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Orhan IA, Özer L, Orhan K. Familial occurrence of nonsyndromal multiple supernumerary teeth. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:891–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajab LD, Hamdam MAM. Supernumerary teeth: review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12:244–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia YJ, Aytes BL, Escoda GC. Multiple supernumerary teeth not associated with complex syndromes: a retrospective study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:E331–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Montenegro FP, Castelion VE, Aytes BL, Escoda GC. Retrospective study of 145 supernumerary teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11:E339–44.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arslan A, Altundal H, Ozel E. The frequency of distomolar teeth in a population of urban Turkish adults: a retrospective study. Oral Radiol. 2009;25:118–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hopcraft M. Multiple supernumerary teeth. Case report. Aust Dent J. 1998;43:17–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nazif MM, Ruffalo CR, Zullo T. Impacted supernumerary teeth: a survey of 50 cases. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;106:201–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehsan D, Tu KH, Camarata J. Mandibular supernumerary tooth causing neurosensory changes: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:1450–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaya ŞG, Yapici G, Ömezli MM, Dayi E. Non-syndromic supernumerary premolars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 [Epub ahead of Print].

  17. Solares R, Romero IM. Supernumerary premolars: a literature review. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:450–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome Turkish population: associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:e575–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tumen EC, Yavuz I, Tumen DS, Hamamci N, Berber G, Atakul F, et al. The detailed evaluation of supernumerary teeth with the aid of cone beam computed tomography. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2010;24:1886–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Padro FE, Armengol PJ, Amat FE. A descriptive study of 113 unerupted supernumerary teeth in 79 pediatric patients in Barcelona. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:E146–52.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sedano HO, Gorlin R. Familial occurrence of mesiodens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;27:360–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Açikgöz A, Açikgöz G, Tunga U, Otan F. Characteristics and prevalence of non-syndrome multiple supernumeraries: a retrospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zvolanek JW, Spotts MT. Supernumerary mandibular premolars: report of cases. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:721–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yusof NZ. Non-syndromal multiple supernumerary teeth: literature review. J Can Dent Assoc. 1990;56:147–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fardi A, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Bachour Z, Parisis N, Tsirlis A. The incidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth—a radiographic study in a North Greek population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e56–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leco-Berrocal MI, Martín-Morales JF, Martínez-González JM. An observational study of the frequency of supernumerary teeth in a population of 2000 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:E134–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Salcido-García JF, Ledesma-Montes C, Hernández-Flores F, Pérez D, Garcés-Ortíz M. Frequency of supernumerary teeth in Mexican population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2004;9:403–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Oliveira Gomes C, Drummond SN, Jham BC, Abdo EN, Mesquita RA. A survey of 460 supernumerary teeth in Brazilian children and adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:98–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Multiple supernumerary teeth: report of two cases. Am J Dent. 1989;2:28–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hyun HK, Lee SJ, Ahn DB, Lee ZH, Heo SM, Seo MB, et al. Nonsyndromic multiple mandibular supernumerary premolars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1366–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bacetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:267–74.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gündüz K, Muğlali M. Non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: a case report. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:81–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Çağrı Bardak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Öztaş, B., Bardak, Ç., Kurşun, E.Ş. et al. Clinical characteristics of non-syndromic supernumerary teeth in a cohort of Turkish patients. Oral Radiol 27, 108–113 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-011-0069-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-011-0069-6

Keywords

Navigation