Skip to main content
Log in

Mylohyoid muscle defects: comparison of CT findings and dissected specimens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether CT images reflect the anatomical condition of mylohyoid muscle defects by confirmation with subsequent dissection of cadavers, and to evaluate whether CT images are useful for detecting such defects.

Methods

CT scans of the head and upper neck were performed in six cadavers. Multiplanar reconstruction was carried out to obtain 2-mm-thick axial and coronal images of the mylohyoid muscle. The number of defects was determined. All the cadavers were subsequently dissected for comparison with the CT findings. The contents of the defects were also identified.

Results

CT demonstrated the presence of one or more mylohyoid defects in four of the six cadavers. Defects were seen bilaterally in three of the four cadavers. Five of eight defects were observed on both axial and coronal images, whereas two were not observed on coronal images and one was not observed on axial images. The defects contained part of the sublingual gland bilaterally in one cadaver and unilaterally in another. In one cadaver, the submental artery passed through the defect bilaterally. In the other cadaver, there were bilateral defects without any substantial contents.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that mylohyoid defects are commonly seen anatomically, and that some of them show herniation of the sublingual gland. CT images can demonstrate mylohyoid defects on multiplanar reconstructed images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gaughran GR. Mylohyoid boutonnière and sublingual bouton. J Anat. 1963;97:565–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Castelli WA, Huelke DF, Celis A. Some basic anatomic features in paralingual space surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;27:613–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nathan H, Luchansky E. Sublingual gland herniation through the mylohyoid muscle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;59:21–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Engel JD, Harn SD, Cohen DM. Mylohyoid herniation: gross and histologic evaluation with clinical correlation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;63:55–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Windisch G, Weiglein AH, Kiesler K. Herniation of the mylohyoid muscle. J Craniofac Surg. 2004;15:566–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. White DK, Davidson HC, Harnberger HR, Haller J, Kamya A. Accessory salivary tissue in the mylohyoid boutonnière: a clinical and radiologic pseudolesion of the oral cavity. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:406–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hopp E, Mortensen B, Kolbenstvedt A. Mylohyoid herniation of the sublingual gland diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:351–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiesler K, Gugatschka M, Friedrich G. Incidence and clinical relevance of herniation of the mylohyoid muscle with penetration of the sublingual gland. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:1071–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keberle M, Eulert S, Relic A, Hahn D. Functional MR imaging of submandibular herniation of sublingual tissues through a gap of the mylohyoid muscle in two cases of submandibular “masses”. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1326–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (15791077).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mika Otonari-Yamamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otonari-Yamamoto, M., Nakajima, K., Tsuji, Y. et al. Mylohyoid muscle defects: comparison of CT findings and dissected specimens. Oral Radiol 27, 50–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-011-0066-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-011-0066-9

Keywords

Navigation