Skip to main content
Log in

Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies

  • Published:
World Wide Web Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there exist several alternative frameworks and standards for describing the digital competencies expected from teachers, there is a lack of Web-based assessment tools that allow authentic, reliable and valid assessment of these competencies. This paper addresses the design challenges related to a software solution for self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies. The empirical part of the paper describes the participatory design process and results from the first user testing of a Web-based self- and peer-assessment tool DigiMina, which supports teachers in building and sharing a personal competency profile. In DigiMina, the competencies are assessed by a teacher herself or by her peers using the performance indicators that are based on the competency model NETS for Teachers created by the International Society of Technology in Education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, R.E.: Stellar Cases of Technology-Supported Innovations. In: Kozma, R.B. (ed.) Technology, Innovation, and Educational Change: A Global Perspective, pp. 195–215. ISTE, Eugene (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bawden, D.: Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. J. Doc. 57(2), 218–259 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M.: Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school. J. e Learn. Knowl. Soc. 4, 183–193 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, J.M.: Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D.: About Face 3: The Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cumming, J.J., Maxwell, G.: Contextualising authentic assessment. Assess. Educ. Princ. Pol. Pract. 6, 177–194 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Pablos Pons, J.: Repositori institucional: higher education and the knowledge society. information and digital competencies. RUSC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento 7, 6–15 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ECDL Foundation: http://www.ecdl.org/ (2012). Accessed 29 February 2012

  10. European Schoolnet: Assessment Schemes for Teachers’ ICT competence. http://www-old.eun.org/insight-pdf/special_reports/PIC_Report_Assessment%20schemes_insightn.pdf (2005). Accessed 29 February 2012

  11. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J.M., Steeples, C., Tickner, S.: Competences for online teaching: a special report. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 49(1), 65–72 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gulikers, J.T.M., Bastiaens, T.J., Kirschner, P.A.: A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 52, 67–86 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinostroza, J.E., Labbé, C., López, L., Iost, H.: Traditional and Emerging IT Applications for Learning. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds.) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, vol. 20, pp. 81–96. Springer, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogenbirk, P., de Rijcke, F. (eds.): Teachers: It clicks Professional development for good ICT practice. The Inspectorate of Education, Utrecht (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. HR-XML Consortium: HR-XML 3.2 Standards Release. http://ns.hr-xml.org/schemas/org_hr-xml/3_2/Documentation/indexes/index.php (2011). Accessed 29 February 2012

  16. IMSGLC: IMS Question and Test Interoperability Implementation Guide. http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qtiv2p1pd2/imsqti_implv2p1pd2.html (2006). Accessed 29 February 2012

  17. IMSGLC: IMS Reusable Definition of Competency or Educational Objective Specification. http://www.imsglobal.org/competencies/ (2002). Accessed 29 February 2012

  18. ISTE: NETS for Teachers 2008, http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers/nets-for-teachers-2008.aspx (2008). Accessed 29 February 2012

  19. Jovanovic, J., Siadaty, M., Gasevic, D., Milikic, N.: IntelLEO Competences Ontology http://www.intelleo.eu/ontologies/competences/spec/ (2011). Accessed 29 February 2012

  20. Leinonen, T., Toikkanen, T., Silvfast, K.: Software as hypothesis: research-based design methodology. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, pp. 61–70. Indiana University, Indianapolis (2008)

  21. Li, Q., Lau, R.W.H., Shih, T.K., Li, F.W.B.: Technology supports for distributed and collaborative learning over the internet. ACM Trans. Internet Tech. 8(2), 1–24 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lombardi, M.M.: Making the Grade: The Role of Assessment in Authentic Learning. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (2008)

  23. Miller, G.E.: The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad. Med. 65, S63–S67 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pečiuliauskienė, P., Barkauskaitė, M.: Would-be teachers’ competence in applying ICT: exposition and preconditions for development. Informat Educ 6(2), 397–410 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Põldoja, H., Väljataga, T., Tammets, K., Laanpere, M.: Web-Based Self- and Peer-Assessment of Teachers’ Educational Technology Competencies. In: Leung, H., Popescu, E., Cao, Y., Lau, R., Nejdl, W. (eds.) ICWL 2011, LNCS, vol. 7048, pp. 122–131. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sampson, D., Fytros, D.: Competence models in technology-enhanced competence-based learning. In: Adelsberger, H.H., Kinshuk, Pawlowski, J.M., Sampson, D. (eds.) International Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, pp. 155–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Tiger Leap Foundation: Educational Technology Competency Model. http://www.tiigrihype.ee/?dl=373 (2011). Accessed 29 February 2012

  28. Tomberg, V., Laanpere, M.: Implementing Distributed Architecture of Online Assessment Tools Based on IMS QTI ver.2. In: Lazarinis, F., Green, S., Pearson, E. (eds.) Handbook of Research on E-Learning Standards and Interoperability: Frameworks and Issues, pp. 41–58. IGI Global (2011)

  29. UNESCO: ICT Competency Standards for Teachers: Implementation Guidelines. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001562/156209e.pdf (2008). Accessed 29 February 2012

  30. Wass, V., Van der Vleuten, C., Shatzer, J., Jones, R.: Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 357, 945–949 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Põldoja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Põldoja, H., Väljataga, T., Laanpere, M. et al. Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies. World Wide Web 17, 255–269 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-012-0176-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-012-0176-2

Keywords

Navigation