Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building a Usable and Accessible Semantic Web Interaction Platform

  • Published:
World Wide Web Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Semantic Web applications take off is being slower than expected, at least with respect to “real-world” applications and users. One of the main reasons for this lack of adoption is that most Semantic Web user interfaces are still immature from the usability and accessibility points of view. This is due to the novelty of these technologies, but this also motivates the exploration of alternative interaction paradigms, different from the “traditional” Web or Desktop applications ones. Our proposal is realized in the Rhizomer platform, which explores the possibilities of the object–action interaction paradigm at the Web scale. This paradigm is well suited for heterogeneous resource spaces such as those common in the Semantic Web. Resources, described by metadata, correspond to the objects in the paradigm. Semantic web services, which are dynamically associated to these objects, correspond to the actions. The platform is being put into practice in the context of a research project in order to build an open application for media distribution based on Semantic Web technologies. Moreover, its usability and accessibility have been evaluated in this real setting and compared to similar systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrue, M., Vigo, M., Abascal J.: Quantitative metrics for web accessibility evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Web Metrics and Measurement (WMM05). Sydney, Australia (2005)

  2. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data. In: The Semantic Web, ISWC/ASCW’07, LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer (2008)

  3. Berners-Lee et al.: Exploring and analyzing linked dates on the semantic web. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Semantic Web User Interaction Workshop (2006)

  4. Bojars, U., Passant, A., Giasson, F., Breslin, J.G.: An architecture to discover and query decentralized RDF data. In: Proceedings of the ESWC’07 Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web, SFSW 2007. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 248. (2007)

  5. Brajnik, G.: Automatic testing, page sampling and measuring web accessibility. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Int. Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, CSUN’08. Los Angeles, CA (2008)

  6. Bruner, J.: Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1990)

  7. Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Guarino, L., Vanderheiden, G.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Recommendation. Retrieved on June 2009 from: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

  8. Corcho, O., López-Cima, A., Gómez-Pérez, A.: The ODESeW 2.0 semantic web application framework. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’06, pp. 1049–1050. ACM Press (2006)

  9. Craig, J., Cooper, M., Pappas, L., Schwerdtfeger, R., Seeman, L.: Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 Working draft. Retrieved on June 2009 from: http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/

  10. Crane, D., Pascarello, E., James, D.: Ajax in Action. Manning Publications, (2005)

  11. Eurostat: Health Statistics. Office for Oficial Publications of the European Communities, 2002. Retrieved from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-08-02-002/EN/KS-08-02-002-EN.PDF

  12. Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility: Overview. Retrieved on June 2009 from: http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/conformance.html

  13. Farrell, J., Lausen, H. (eds.): Semantic Annotations for WSDL and XML Schema. W3C Working Draft, 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/sawsdl

  14. Forrest, B.: Google Deprecates Their SOAP Search API. O’Reilly Radar, December 18, 2006. http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/12/google_depreciates_SOAP_API.html

  15. García, R., Gil, R.: A web ontology for copyright contracts management. Int J Electron Commer 12(4), 103–117 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. García, R., Gimeno, J.M.: Open Platform for Multichannel Media Distribution Management HTML. Position paper, W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networking, 15–16 January. Barcelona, Spain (2009)

  17. García, R., Gimeno, J.M., Perdrix, F., Gil, R., Oliva, M.: A platform for object–action semantic web interaction. In: 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Knowledge Patterns, EKAW’08. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5268, pp. 404–418. Springer (2008)

  18. García, R., Gimeno, J.M., Perdrix, F., Gil, R., Oliva, M.: The Rhizomer semantic content management system. In : 1st World Summit on the Knowledge Society (WSKS 2008). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5288, pp. 385–394. Springer (2008)

  19. García, R., Tsinaraki, C., Celma, O., Christodoulakis, S.: Multimedia content description using Semantic Web languages. In: Kompatsiaris Y., Hobson, P. (eds.) Semantic Multimedia and Ontologies: Theory and Applications, pp. 17–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

  20. González, M., Masip, L., Granollers, T., Oliva, M.: Quantitative analysis in a heuristic evaluation experiment. Advances in Engineering Software. (2009, in press)

  21. Granollers, T.: User Centred Design Process Model: Integration of Usability Engineering and Software Engineering. Doctoral Consortium, INTERACT’03, Zurich (2003)

  22. Heath, T., Domingue, J., Shabajee, P.: User interaction and uptake challenges to successfully deploying Semantic Web technologies. In: Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web User Interaction Workshop. Athens, Georgia, USA (2006)

  23. Hildebrand, M., Ossenbruggen, J., Hardman, L.: /facet: a browser for heterogeneous Semantic Web repositories. In: Proc. of the International Semantic Web Conference 2006. Lecture Notices in Computer Science, vol. 4273, pp. 272–285. Springer (2006)

  24. Huynh, D.F., Karger, D.R., Miller, R. C.: Exhibit: lightweight structured data publishing. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 737–746. Banff, Alberta, Canada, ACM (2007)

  25. ISO 9241-11. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic Req. Part 11: Guidance on Usability. ISO 9241-11 (1998)

  26. Jeffries, R., Miller, J.R., Wharton, C., Uyeda, K.M.: User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. In: Proceedings ACM CHI’91 Conference, pp. 119–124. New Orleans, LA (1991)

  27. Krötzsch, M., Vrandečić, D., Völkel, M.: Semantic MediaWiki. In : Proceedings of the Int. Semantic Web Conference, ISWC’06. LNCS vol. 4273, pp. 935–942. Springer (2006)

  28. Maguitman, A.G., Menczer, F., Erdinc, F., Roinestad, H., Vespignani, A.: Algorithmic computation and approximation of semantic similarity. World Wide Web 9(4), 431–456 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin, D. (ed.): OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. W3C Member Submission, 2004. http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S

  30. Mukherjee, S., Ramakrishnan, I.V.: Automated semantic analysis of schematic data. World Wide Web 11(4), 427–464 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. AP Professional, Boston (1993)

  32. Nielsen J.: Severity ratings for usability problems. useit.com: usable information technology, 1995. Available from: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/severityrating.html

  33. Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L.: Usability inspection methods. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press (1990)

  35. Preliminary Review of Web Sites for Accessibility. Retrieved on June 2009 from: http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/preliminary.html

  36. Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, 2008. Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query

  37. Quan, D., Huynh, D., Karger, D.: Haystack: a platform for authoring end user Semantic Web applications. In: The SemanticWeb—ISWC 2003. Lecture Notices in Computer Science, vol. 2870, pp. 738–753. Springer (2003)

  38. Raskin, J.: The Human Interface. Addison Wesley, Munchen (2000)

  39. Richardson, L., Ruby, S.: Restful Web Services. O’Reilly, Cambridge, MA (2007)

  40. Roman, D., Keller, O., Lausen, H., de Bruijn, J., Lara, R., Stollberg, M., et al.: Web service modeling ontology. Applied Ontology 1(1), 77–106 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Berners-Lee, T.: The Semantic Web revisited. Intelligent Systems 21(3), 96–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sullivan, T., Matson, R.: Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the web’s most popular sites. In: Proc. of ACM Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 139–144. (2000)

  43. Tejedor, J., García, R., Fernández, M., López, F., Perdrix, F., Macías, J.A., Gil, R., Oliva, M., Moya, D., Colás, J., Castells, P.: Ontology-based retrieval of human speech. In: Proc. of the 6th International Workshop on Web Semantics, WebS’07. IEEE Computer Society Press (2007)

  44. Tidwell, J.: Designing Interfaces: Patterns for Effective Interaction Design. O’Reilly (2005)

  45. Tummarello, G., Morbidoni, C., Puliti, P., Piazza, F.: Signing individual fragments of an RDF graph. In: Proceedings of the WWW 2005 Conference, pp. 1020–1021. (2005)

  46. Velleman, E., Velasco, C., Snaprud, M., Burger, D. (eds.): (2006) Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM 1.0). Retrieved on November 2008 from: http://www.wabcluster.org/uwem1/UWEM_1_0.pdf

  47. Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools, Complete List. Retrieved on June 2009 from: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/complete

  48. Weerawarana, S., Curbera, F., Leymann, F., Storey, T., Ferguson, D.F.: Web Services Platform Architecture: SOAP, WSDL, WS-Policy, WS-Addressing, WS-BPEL, WS-Reliable Messaging, and More. Prentice Hall (2005)

  49. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Content Acessibility Guidelines 1.0, 1999. Retrieved on June 2009 from: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat of Lleida, Jaume II, 69, 25001, Lleida, Spain

    Roberto García, Juan Manuel Gimeno, Ferran Perdrix, Rosa Gil, Marta Oliva, Juan Miguel López, Afra Pascual & Montserrat Sendín

  2. Segre Media Group, Del Riu 6, 25007, Lleida, Spain

    Ferran Perdrix

Authors
  1. Roberto García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Manuel Gimeno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ferran Perdrix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rosa Gil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marta Oliva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Juan Miguel López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Afra Pascual
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Montserrat Sendín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García, R., Gimeno, J.M., Perdrix, F. et al. Building a Usable and Accessible Semantic Web Interaction Platform. World Wide Web 13, 143–167 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-009-0076-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-009-0076-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation