Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization of Quality of Service in 5G Cellular Network by Focusing on Interference Management

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years the increase of mobile devices and users of the internet has led to an increase in the burden on the network, low connectivity, low bandwidth, and less throughput. With many advantages of the 5G cellular network, this network suffers from signal interference which causes a massive problem for the network. There are many challenges in the cellular network related to energy consumption, and one of the leading and critical issues in 5G is interference management. There is poor voice quality during indoor communication, so interference management provides Quality of Service (QoS) to improve this communication. In indoor communication, there is low power compared to outdoor communication because there are many users, and due to users, there are low data rates and overhead on the base station. From this viewpoint, modulation schema and coding schemes achieve better channel conditions, a significant convergence area, and better QoS. This research proposes a scheme named multiple input multiple output (MIMO) technology for interference management in a 5G network. The evaluation of this scheme with a relay strategy has also been carried out to avoid interference and enhance the strength of the propagated signal. The simulation has revealed the performance of the proposed interference management scheme with a relay strategy based on performance evaluation parameters such as end-to-end delay, throughput, path loss, and energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

N/A

References

  1. Pandya, K. (2015). Comparative study on wireless mobile technology: 1G, 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G. IJRTER, 1, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, A., & Agarwal, K. (2014). The next generation mobile wireless cellular networks–4G and beyond. American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2, 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Visser, H. J., & Vullers, R. J. (2013). RF energy harvesting and transport for wireless sensor network applications: Principles and requirements. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101, 1410–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, X., Jiang, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, C., Wang, Z., & Chen, X. (2009). An energy-efficient ASIC for wireless body sensor networks in medical applications. IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems, 4, 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karki, R. S., & Garia, V. B. (2016). Next generations of mobile networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 975, 8887.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rayan, N. L., & Krishna, C. (2014). A survey on mobile wireless networks. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 68, 2229.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baba, M. I., Nafees, N., Manzoor, I., Naik, K. A., & Ahmed, S. (2018). Evolution of mobile wireless communication systems from 1g to 5g: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 4, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yadav, R. (2017). Challenges and evolution of next generations wireless communication. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.

  9. Khatouni, A. S., Mellia, M., Marsan, M. A., Alfredsson, S., Karlsson, J., Brunstrom, A. et al., (2017). Speedtest-like measurements in 3g/4g networks: The monroe experience. In 2017 29th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC 29) (pp. 169–177).

  10. Ezhilarasan, E., & Dinakaran, M. (2017). A Review on mobile technologies: 3G, 4G and 5G. In 2017 second international conference on recent trends and challenges in computational models (ICRTCCM) (pp. 369–373).

  11. Kim, B. H., & Calin, D. (2017). On the split-tcp performance over real 4g lte and 3g wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55, 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gawas, A. U. (2015). An overview on evolution of mobile wireless communication networks: 1G–6G. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 3, 3130–3133.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tondare, S. M., Panchal, S. D., & Kushnure, D. (2014). Evolutionary steps from 1G to 4.5 G. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 3, 6163–6166.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muhammad, S., Saeed, K., Hussain, T., Abbas, A., Khalil, I., Ali, I., et al. (2019). Impact of jelly fish attackonthe performance of DSR routing protocol in MANETs. Journal of Mechanics Continua and Mathamatical Sciences, 14, 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vincetti, L., Maini, M., Pinotti, E., Larcher, L., Scorcioni, S., Bertacchini, A., et al., (2012). Broadband printed antenna for radiofrequency energy harvesting. In 2012 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (pp. 814–816).

  16. Singh, A. (2015). A review of different generations of mobile technology. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering and Technology (IJARCET), 4, 3404–3408.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mousa, A. M. (2012). Prospective of fifth generation mobile communications. International Journal of Next-Generation Networks (IJNGN), 4, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mehta, H., Patel, D., Joshi, B., & Modi, H. (2014). 0G to 5G mobile technology: A survey. Journal of Basic and Applied Engineering Research, 1, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaur, G. P., Birla, J., & Ahlawat, J. (2011). Generations of wireless technology. IJCSMS International Journal of Computer Science and Management Studies, 11, 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hossain, E., & Hasan, M. (2015). 5G cellular: Key enabling technologies and research challenges. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 18, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Azeem, S. A., & Sharma, S. K. (2017). Wireless cellular technologies and convergence. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 5, 766–772.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ali, I., Hussain, T., Khan, K., Iqbal, A., & Perviz, F. (2020). The impact of IEEE 802.11 contention window on the performance of transmission control protocol in mobile Ad-Hoc network. ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 9, 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patil, C., Karhe, R., & Aher, M. (2012). Review on generations in mobile cellular technology. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2, 901–912.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ho, C. K., & Zhang, R. (2012). Optimal energy allocation for wireless communications with energy harvesting constraints. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60, 4808–4818.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussain, A., Hussain, T., Ali, I., & Khan, M. R. (2020). Impact of sparse and dense deployment of nodes under different propagation models in manets. ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 9, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gu, Y., & Aissa, S. (2015). RF-based energy harvesting in decode-and-forward relaying systems: Ergodic and outage capacities. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14, 6425–6434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhattacharyya, D., Kim, T.-H., & Pal, S. (2010). A comparative study of wireless sensor networks and their routing protocols. Sensors, 10, 10506–10523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Somani, G., Gaur, M. S., Sanghi, D., Conti, M., & Buyya, R. (2017). DDoS attacks in cloud computing: Issues, taxonomy, and future directions. Computer Communications, 107, 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pereira, V., & Sousa, T. (2004). Evolution of Mobile Communications: From 1G to 4G. Department of Informatics Engineering of the University of Coimbra.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Divakar, B. V., Patil, D., & Subramanium, P. (2020). Energy optimization in wireless sensor network using clustering and PSO algorithm. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 5267.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Katz, M., & Fitzek, F. H. (2005). On the definition of the fourth generation wireless communications networks: The challenges ahead. In Proceeding of the International Workshop on Convergent Technologies (IWCT 05).

  32. Hussain, T., Rehman, Z. U., Iqbal, A., Saeed, K., & Ali, I. (2020). Two hop verification for avoiding void hole in underwater wireless sensor network using SM-AHH-VBF and AVH-AHH-VBF routing protocols. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 31, e3992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, X. (2016). Sensor networks with wireless energy harvesting. In D. Niyato, E. Hossain, D. I. Kim, V. Bhargava, & L. Shafai (Eds.), Wireless-powered communication networks architectures, protocols, and applications. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mittal, N., & Singh, A. G. (2017). Chaining mobility models for AOMDV and DSDV protocols in FANETs

  35. Agrawal, S., Pandey, S., Singh, J., & Kondekar, P. N. (2013). An efficient RF energy harvester with tuned matching circuit. In M. S. Gaur, M. Zwolinski, V. Laxmi, D. Boolchandani, V. Sing, & A. D. Sing (Eds.), VLSI design and test (pp. 138–145). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhattacharyya, B., & Bhattacharya, S. (2013). Emerging fields in 4G technology, its applications & beyond-An overview. International Journal of Information and Computation Technology, 3, 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roberts, M. L., Temple, M. A., Mills, R. F., & Raines, R. A. (2006). Evolution of the air interface of cellular communications systems toward 4G realization. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 8, 2–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fagbohun, O. O. (2014). Comparative studies on 3G, 4G and 5G wireless technology. IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 9, 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hussain, T., Yang, B., Rahman, H. U., Iqbal, A., Ali, F., & Shah, B. (2022). Improving source location privacy in social internet of things using a hybrid phantom routing technique. Computers & Security, 123, 102917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gill, J., & Singh, S. (2015). Future prospects of wireless generations in mobile communication. Asian Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 4, 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Felita, C., & Suryanegara, M. (2013). 5G key technologies: Identifying innovation opportunity. In 2013 International Conference on QiR (pp 235–238).

  42. Kumar, S., Gupta, G., & Singh, K. R. (2015). 5G: Revolution of future communication technology. In 2015 international conference on green computing and internet of things (ICGCIoT) (pp. 143–147).

  43. Majeed, A. (2015). Comparative studies of 3G, 4G & 5G mobile network & data offloading method a survey. In International Journal of Research in Information Technology, Hajvery University Gulberg Lahore.

  44. Chattopadhyay, A. S., & Agarwal, N. (2018). Performance analysis of different routing protocols for mobile Ad-Hoc network. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 8, 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rakesh, K. (2016). A framework of (4G) wireless networks-overview and challenges. Journal of Excellence in Computer Science and Engineering, 2, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pedras, V., Sousa, M., Vieira, P., Queluz, M. P., & Rodrigues, A. (2018). A no-reference user centric QoE model for voice and web browsing based on 3G/4G radio measurements. In 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (pp. 1–6).

  47. Prauzek, M., Konecny, J., Borova, M., Janosova, K., Hlavica, J., & Musilek, P. (2018). Energy harvesting sources, storage devices and system topologies for environmental wireless sensor networks: A review. Sensors, 18, 2446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tan, Y. K., & Panda, S. K. (2011). Self-autonomous wireless sensor nodes with wind energy harvesting for remote sensing of wind-driven wildfire spread. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 60, 1367–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tan, Y. K., & Panda, S. K. (2010). Energy harvesting from hybrid indoor ambient light and thermal energy sources for enhanced performance of wireless sensor nodes. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58, 4424–4435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sodano, H. A., Simmers, G. E., Dereux, R., & Inman, D. J. (2007). Recharging batteries using energy harvested from thermal gradients. Journal of Intelligent material systems and structures, 18, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Seah, W. K., Eu, Z. A., & Tan, H.-P. (2009). Wireless sensor networks powered by ambient energy harvesting (WSN-HEAP)-Survey and challenges. In 2009 1st International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology (pp. 1–5).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62172366. Tariq Hussain contributed equally to this work and is the first co-authors.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62172366.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Muhammad Ayaz and Altaf Hussain have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Computer Sciences and Information Technology, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Muhammad Ayaz & Iqtidar Ali

  2. School of Computer Science & Technology, Chongqing University of Posts & Telecommunications, Chongqing, China

    Altaf Hussain

  3. School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University Hangzhou, Hangzhou, China

    Tariq Hussain

  4. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China

    Tariq Hussain

Authors
  1. Muhammad Ayaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Altaf Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tariq Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Iqtidar Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Muhammad Ayaz: Conceptualization, Methodology, and Software. Tariq Hussain: Resources, Validation, Investigation Writing-Original Draft. Visualization, Review, and Editing. Iqtidar Ali: Supervision, Altaf Hussain: Writing and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Hussain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

We confirm that relevant guidelines and regulations are carried out in all methods.

Consent for Publication

The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayaz, M., Hussain, A., Hussain, T. et al. Optimization of Quality of Service in 5G Cellular Network by Focusing on Interference Management. Wireless Pers Commun 135, 2229–2254 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11139-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11139-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation