Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Optimization of SAR ADC using Dynamic Controlled Comparator at 45 nm Technology for Biomedical and IoT Applications

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Emerging biomedical applications such as electrocardiography, electroencephalogram, wireless implantable devices have required optimized power-based SAR ADC in them to reduce package cost and to extend battery life. In view of power optimized SAR ADC, a dynamic controlled comparator with novel static power reduction logic incorporated with common mode kickback noise reduction technique is designed at 45 nm technology in CADENCE Virtuoso in this paper. Designed comparator is analyzed in terms of performance parameters; static power dissipation, transient power dissipation, maximum sampling rate, offset voltage and delay. Simulation and behaviour modeling analyses of proposed dynamic comparator has resulted in five times reduction in static power dissipation along with optimization of transient power and sampling rate as well compared to previously available double tail dynamic comparator. Moreover, it has been mentioned that proposed dynamic comparator is dissipating 2.36 pW of static power and 3.59 nW of transient power with sampling rate of 240 KS/s at 0.5 V. Further, the kickback noise of proposed design is limited to 4.7 mV with maximum delay of 124 ps. Finally, the novel outcomes of proposed comparator are the optimization in required parameters such as power, delay, offset voltage and kickback noise for biomedical applications as compared to double tail dynamic comparator. The proposed consideration for SAR ADC can become a backbone for low power biomedical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All the data has been included in the manuscript and there is no other data and material related with this paper.

Code Availability

The simulation output has been included in the paper as per 45 nm technology node of CADENCE Virtuoso and there is no other code available regarding this paper.

References

  1. Dondi, S., Vecchi, D., Boni, A., & Bigi, M. (2006). A 6- bit, 1.2 GHz Interleaved SAR ADC in 90 nm CMOS. In 2006 Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (pp. 301–304).

  2. Junhui, L., Xin, L., Huang, L., & Wu, J. (2020). An energy-efficient switching scheme with low common-mode voltage variation and no-capacitor-splitting DAC for SAR ADC. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 104, 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandrumaka, K., & Noorbasha, F. (2019). A low power 10-bit SAR ADC with variable threshold technique for biomedical applications. SN Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0940-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mao, W., Li, Y., Heng, C., & Lian, Y. (2018). A Low power 12 bit 1-KS/s SAR ADC for biomedical signal processing SAR-assisted time interleaved SAR (SATI-SAR) ADC. IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems-1, 66(2), 1549–8328.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, T. Y., Li, H. Y., Ma, Z. Y., Huang, Y. J., & Peng, S. Y. (2018). A bypass switching SAR-ADC with a dynamic proximity comparator for biomedical applications. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 53(6), 0018–9200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, T., Xu, D., Niu, H., & Meng, Q. (2020). A 12-bit 120 MS/s SAR ADC with improved split capacitive DAC and low noise dynamic comparator. Springer, 102, 403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCrery, L., & Gray, P. R. (1975). AII-MOS charge redistribution analog-to-digital conversion technique. Part I IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 10(6), 371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang, X., Shen, L., Kasap, B., Yang, X., Shi, W., Mukherjee, A., Pan, D. Z., & Sun, N. (2020). An energy-efficient comparator with dynamic floating inverter amplifier. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 55(4), 1011–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, L., Sanyal, A., Ma, J., Tang, X., & Sun, N. (2016). Comparator common-mode variation effects analysis and its application in SAR ADCs. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (pp. 2014–2017).

  10. Yousefirad, M., & Yavari, M. (2021). Kick back noise reduction and offset cancellation technique for dynamic latched comparator. In 29th Iranian conference on electrical engineering (pp. 149–153).

  11. Mashhadi, S. B., & Lotfi, R. (2014). Analysis and design of a low-voltage low-power double-tail comparator. IEEE Transactions on Very Large-Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 22, 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang, X., Liu, J., Shen, Y., Li, S., Shen, L., Sanyal, A., Ragab, K., & Sun, N. (2022). Low-power SAR ADC design: Overview and survey of state-of-the-art techniques. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 69(6), 2249–2262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vafaei, M., Hosseini, M. R., Abiri, E., & Salehi, M. R. (2023). A 0.2-V 1.2 nW 1-KS/s SAR ADC with a novel comparator structure for biomedical applications. Integration, the VLSI journal, 88, 362–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyahara, M., Asada, Y., Paik, D., & Matsuzawa, A. (2008). A low-noise self-calibrating dynamic comparator for high-speed ADCs. In IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference Fukuoka (pp. 269–272).

  15. Bindra, H. S., Lokin, C. E., Schinkel, D., Annema, A. J., & Nauta, B. (2018). A 1.2-V dynamic bias latch-type comparator in 65-nm CMOS with 0.4-mV input noise. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 53(7), 1902–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Figueiredo, P. M., & Vital, J. C. (2004). Low kickback noise techniques for CMOS latched comparators. In Chipidea Microelectrónica (Vol. 733, pp. 2780-2920). SA. Taguspar

  17. Goll, B., & Zimmermann, H. (2009). A comparator with reduced delay time in 65-nm CMOS for supply voltages down to 0.65. IEEE Transactions Circuits System II, Exp. Briefs, 56(11), 810–814.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Velagaleti, S. K., Nayanathara, K. S., & Madhavi, B. K. (2020). Design considerations of high linear SAR-ADC for wireless implantable systems. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmadi, M., & Namgoong, W. (2015). Comparator power minimization analysis for SAR ADC using multiple comparators. IEEE transactions on Circuits and Systems, 62(10), 1549–8328.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu, W., Liu, Y., Nguyen, T., Lie, D., & Ginsburg, B. (2013). An 8-bit single ended Ultra low power SAR ADC with a novel DAC-switching method and a counter based-digital control circuitry. IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems-1, 60(7), 1726–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kandala, M., Sekar, R., Zhang, C., & Wang, H. (2010). A low power charge-redistribution ADC with reduced capacitor array. In 2010 11th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2010.5450404.

  22. Tyagi, M., Mittal, P., & Kumar, P. (2023). Design of 8-bit low power SAR ADC in 45nm for biomedical implants. Physica Scripta, IOP science Journal, 98, 116101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheong, J., Chan, K., Khannur, P., Tiew, K., & Je, M. (2011). A 400-nW 19.5 FJ/conversion step 8 ENOB 80-KS/S SAR ADC in 0.18- µm CMOS. IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems-11 express briefs, 58(7), 407–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shim, J., Kim, M., Hong, S., & Hwon, O. (2018). An ultra-low power 16 bit second order incremental ADC with SAR-based integrator for IoT sensor applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems-11, 65(12), 1899–1903.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar, N., & Mittal, P. (2020). Performance investigation of 2:1 multiplexer using 90 nm technology node for low power application. In International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ICE3–2020), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE348803.2020.9122869,2020.

  26. Lu, H. W., Yu, X. P., Lu, Z. H., Yeo, K. S., & Chen, J. M. (2020). A data-dependent energy reduction algorithm for SAR ADC using self-adaptive window. Microelectronics Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2020.104754

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding to support this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poornima Mittal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tyagi, M., Mittal, P. & Kumar, P. Performance Optimization of SAR ADC using Dynamic Controlled Comparator at 45 nm Technology for Biomedical and IoT Applications. Wireless Pers Commun 134, 1035–1057 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-10971-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-10971-1

Keywords

Navigation