Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

PECDF-CMRP: A Power-Efficient Compressive Data Fusion and Cluster-Based Multi-hop Relay-Assisted Routing Protocol for IoT Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor network (WSN) is the predominantly used technology in building real-time event monitoring and dissemination frameworks for the internet of things (IoT) applications. However, WSN being power-hungry, fragile, and highly susceptible to loss of connectivity, it becomes vital to strengthen the network's communication reliability and energy efficiency. In this paper, a power-efficient compressive data fusion and cluster-based multi-hop relay-assisted protocol (PECDF-CMRP) for IoT sensor networks is proposed. Firstly, K-means algorithm is adapted to assign the nodes into unequal cells. Then cluster heads are nominated by multi-weight functions. Next, relays are chosen from the K cells to establish cooperative networks for data broadcast from the event sectors to the central gateway. The relay allocation is formulated as a maximization problem regarding the node's energy and path loss. The data aggregation is realized with single-level wavelet sparsity-based fusion. Experimental results confirm the supremacy of the proposed PECDF-CMRP in terms of reduced delay and energy consumption with enhanced lifetime and reception-ratio well above related models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

source CH

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Available on request.

References

  1. Elumalai, G., & Ramakrishnan, R. (2020). A novel approach to monitor and maintain database about physiological parameters of (Javelin) athletes using internet of things (IoT). Wireless Personal Communications, 111, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06862-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balasamy, K., Krishnaraj, N., Ramprasath, J., & Ramprakash, P. (2021). A secure framework for protecting clinical data in medical IoT environment. Smart Healthcare System Design: Security and Privacy Aspects. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119792253.ch9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suganyadevi, S., Shamia, D., & Balasamy, K. (2021). An IoT-based diet monitoring healthcare system for women. Smart Healthcare System Design: Security and Privacy Aspects. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119792253.ch8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jorge, M., Pardiñas, R., Lamberti, M. A., & Muller, & Gimenes C. (2018). Wireless sensor network as a living lab for the development of solutions for IoT and smart cities. ICETE: E-business and telecommunications. Portugal: Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Agbulu G. P., Kumar G. J. R., and Kirubakaran D. (2022) A power-efficient and delay-sensitive mutipath sensor networks protocol for precision farming deployments. In Proc. International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI), pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCAI53970.2022.9752508.

  6. Mollah, M. B., Zeadally, S., & Azad, M. K. (2019). Emerging wireless technologies for internet of things applications: Opportunities and challenges. In X. Shen, X. Lin, & K. Zhang (Eds.), Encyclopedia of wireless networks. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aranzazu-Suescun, C., & Cardei, M. (2019). Anchor-based routing protocol with dynamic clustering for Internet of Things WSNs. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-019-1447-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chowdhury, S. M., & Hossain, A. (2020). Different energy saving schemes in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Wireless Personal Communications, 114, 2043–2062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raja Basha, A. (2022). A review on wireless sensor networks: Routing. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09583-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joshitha, K. L., & Jayashri, S. (2019). Performance analysis for lifetime improvement of a regression based clustered network through cluster member allocation and secondary cluster head selection in a distributed WSN. Cluster Computing, 22, 9805–9814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Q., Lin, D., Yang, P., & Zhang, Z. (2019). An energy-efficient compressive sensing-based clustering routing protocol for WSNs. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(10), 3950–3960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, J., Tang, J., Wang, T., & Chen, F. (2017). (2017) Energy-efficient data-gathering rendezvous algorithms with mobile sinks for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 23(4), 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarhani, M., Kavian, Y. S., & Siavoshi, S. (2014). SEECH: Scalable energy efficient clustering hierarchy protocol in wireless sensor networks”. IEEE Sensors Journal, 14(11), 3944–3954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Agbulu, G. P., Joselin, G. R. K., & Juliet, A. V. (2020). A lifetime-enhancing cooperative data gathering and relaying algorithm for cluster-based wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147719900111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo, L., Gong, F. K., & Chen, X. (2019). Harmonic-mean-based dual-antenna selection with distributed concatenated alamouti codes in two-way relaying networks. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2019.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shalli, et al. (2015). A novel scheme for an energy efficient internet of things based on wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 15(11), 28603–28626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manjeshwar,& Agarwal D.P (2001).TEEN: A routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks.In International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium. San Francisco, California , (pp.23–27) .IEEE

  18. Zeng-wei, Z., Zhao-hui,W., & Huai-zhong, L. (2004).An event-driven clustering routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks,” In: Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai ,pp. 1802–1806, 2004.

  19. Agbulu, G. P., Joselin, G. R. K., & Juliet, A. V. (2020). AERAA-DAR: Algorithm for energy-resourceful attribute-aware data aggregation and routing in wireless sensor networks. Adhoc & Sensor Wireless Networks, 46(3–4), 265–296.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Akila, I. S., & Venkatesan, R. (2019). An energy balanced geo-cluster head set based multi-hop routing for wireless sensor networks. Cluster Computing, 22, 9865–9874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Priyadarshi, et al. (2020). Three level heterogeneous clustering protocol for wireless sensor network. Microsystem Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-020-04874-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ming, L., & Yanling, W. (2018). Study on multipoint relays selection based on SINR and residual energy aware in wireless multi-hop networks. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(2), 1281–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laurindo, S., Moraes, R., Nassiffe, R., Montez, C., & Vasques, F. (2018). An optimized relay selection technique to improve the communication reliability in wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 18, 3263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao, H., Zhang, S., Su, Y., Diao, M., & Jo, M. (2019). Joint multiple relay selection and time slot allocation algorithm for the EH-abled cognitive multi-user relay networks. IEEE Access, 7, 111993–112007. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hongyuan, G., Yumeng, S., & Zhang, S. (2019). A multiple relay selection scheme based on QPO in cognitive relay networks. International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing, 16(4), 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Asheer, S., & Kumar, S. (2020). Lifetime enhancement of a WSN through duty cycle in an aggregation based cooperative MIMO framework”. Wireless Personal Communications, 112, 1783–1808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07127-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bayrakdar, M. E. (2019). Cooperative communication based access technique for sensor networks. International Journal of Electronics, 107(2), 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu, K., & Wang, F. (2018). Relay selection in energy harvesting cooperative networks with rateless codes”. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1955, 040109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vignesh, S.R, Sukumaran R., Ponraj ., T. C. S. , Manikandan T.T., and Saravanan M., (2022). Implementation of routing protocol in underwater sensor networks for energy harvesting. In Proc. 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology, (pp. 354–361).IEEE

  30. Ouadoudi, Z., Hacène, F., & Sherali, Z. (2022). A realistic relay selection scheme for cooperative MIMO networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 124, 102706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2021.102706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fitriawan, H., Susanto, M. Arifin, A.S., Mausa D., & Trisanto, A (2017) ZigBee based wireless sensor networks and performance analysis in various environments. In 15th International Conference on Quality in Research (QiR) : International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nusa Dua,( pp. 272–275).IEEE

  32. Uradzinski, et al. (2017). Advanced indoor positioning using zigbee wireless technology. Wireless Personal Communication, 97, 6509–6518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Razzaq, M. Kwon, G.R., & Shin, S. (2018) Energy efficient Dijkstra-based weighted sum minimization routing protocol for WSN. In: 3rd International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC). IEEE

  34. Mohammed, S., & Al-kahtani. (2020). A review of relay assignment problem in the cooperative wireless sensor networks. Electronics, 9(3), 443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Suganyadevi, S., Seethalakshmi, V., & Balasamy, K. (2021). A review on deep learning in medical image analysis. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13735-021-00218-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dokkyun, Y., Sangmin, J., & Sunyoung,. (2019). An enhanced optimization scheme based on gradient descent methods for machine learning. Symmetry, 11(7), 942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Balasamy, K., & Shamia, D. (2021). Feature extraction-based medical image watermarking using fuzzy-based median filter. IETE Journal of Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2021.1893231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Balasamy, K., Krishnaraj, N., & Vijayalakshmi, K. (2021). An adaptive neuro-fuzzy based region selection and authenticating medical image through watermarking for secure communication. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09031-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Pius Agbulu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The named authors have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise include appropriate disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agbulu, G.P., Kumar, G.J.R., Juliet, V.A. et al. PECDF-CMRP: A Power-Efficient Compressive Data Fusion and Cluster-Based Multi-hop Relay-Assisted Routing Protocol for IoT Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 127, 2955–2977 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09905-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09905-6

Keywords

Navigation