Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

IBRE-LEACH: Improving the Performance of the BRE-LEACH for Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks are extensively used in different fields, including severe and harsh environments such as battlegrounds, volcanic areas, healthcare, and so on. The major constraint of WSNs is the limited power supply, which impacts the lifecycle of the entire network. Clustering is a performing method used in WSNs to optimize power consumption and extend the lifetime of WSNs. LEACH is considered the first classical clustering protocol used in WSNs to optimize energy consumption. Many protocols have been developed to enhance the conventional LEACH protocol. BRE-LEACH (Balanced Residual Energy LEACH) is one of them. It is used to enhance the performance of the LEACH protocol. In this paper, we propose a new improved BRE-LEACH protocol called IBRE-LEACH (Improved Balanced Residual Energy LEACH), which improves the performance of the BRE-LEACH approach. The IBRE-LEACH combines clustering and multi-hop techniques. It selects CHs according to the residual energy and limits the maximum number of nodes in each cluster to balance the energy consumption. Thus, IBRE-LEACH allows the Abandoned Nodes to send their data to the BS. Furthermore, it routes the gathered data using CHs, ANs, and a root node, which is a node with maximum residual energy and minimum distance to the BS. The simulation results in MATLAB show that the IBRE-LEACH protocol increases the throughput, optimizes energy consumption, extends network lifetime, and ameliorates stability by 81.99%, 94.33%, and 91.47% compared to BRE-LEACH, LEACH-C, and LEACH, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data and simulation programs that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Fanian, F., & Rafsanjani, M. K. (2019). Cluster-based routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey based on methodology. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 142, 111–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Daanoune, I., Baghdad, A., & Ballouk, A. (2020). An enhanced energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor network. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(5), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, Y., Qiong, W., Zhao, T., Tie, Y., Bai, F., & Jin, M. (2019). An improved energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 19, 4579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zungeru, A. M., Ang, L.-M., & Seng, K. P. (2012). Classical and swarm intelligence based routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey and comparison. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(5), 1508–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wenliang, W., Xiong, N., & Chunxue, W. (2017). Improved clustering algorithm based on energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. IET Networks, 6, 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tyagi, S., & Kumar, N. (2013). A systematic review on clustering and routing techniques based upon LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(2), 623–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zin, S. M., Anuar, N. B., Kiah, M. L. M., & Pathan, A.-S.K. (2014). Routing protocol design for secure WSN Review and open research issues. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 41, 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rehan, W., Fischer, S., Rehan, M., Mawad, Y., & Saleem, S. (2020). QCM2R: A QoS-aware cross-layered multichannel multisink routing protocol for stream based wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 156, 102552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yousaf, A., Ahmad, F., Hamid, S., & Khan, F. (2019). Performance comparison of various LEACH protocols in wireless sensor networks. In: 2019 IEEE 15th international colloquium on signal processing & its applications (CSPA) (pp. 108–113). IEEE.

  10. Daanoune, I., Baghdad, A., & Balllouk, A. (2019). A comparative study between ACO-based protocols and PSO-based protocols in WSN. In: 2019 7th mediterranean congress of telecommunications (CMT) (pp. 1–4).

  11. Al Aghbari, Z., Khedr, A. M., Osamy, W., Arif, I., & Agrawal, D. P. (2019). Routing in wireless sensor networks using optimization techniques: A survey. Wireless Personal Communications, 111(4), 2407–2434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, J., Zhao, Z., Yuan, Y., & Hong, Y. (2017). Multi-factor and distributed clustering routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 95(3), 2127–2142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moorthi, & Thiagarajan, R. (2020). Energy consumption and network connectivity based on Novel-LEACH-POS protocol networks. Computer Communications, 149, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cai, X., Geng, S., Wu, D., Wang, L., & Wu, Q. (2020). A unified heuristic bat algorithm to optimize the LEACH protocol. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 32(9), e5619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daanoune, I., Abdennaceur, B., & Ballouk, A. (2021). A comprehensive survey on LEACH-based clustering routing protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 114, 102409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Daanoune, I., Baghdad, A., & Balllouk, A. (2019). BRE-LEACH: A new approach to extend the lifetime Of WSN. In: Third Inter. Conference on Intelligent Computing in Data Sciences (ICDS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  17. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual hawaii international conference on system sciences (vol. 1, p. 10). IEEE Comput. Soc.

  18. Abu Salem, A. O., & Shudifat, N. (2019). Enhanced LEACH protocol for increasing a lifetime of WSNs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 23, 901–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mengjia Zeng, X., Huang, B. Z., & Fan, X. (2019). A heterogeneous energy wireless sensor network clustering protocol. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 1–11, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma, Z., Li, G., & Gong, Q. (2016). Improvement on LEACH-C protocol of wireless sensor network (LEACH-CC). International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 9, 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sivakumar, P., & Radhika, M. (2018). Performance analysis of LEACH-GA over LEACH and LEACH-C in WSN. Procedia Computer Science, 125, 248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Henrique Brandao Neto, J., Cardoso, A. R., & Celestino Jr, J. (2014). MH-LEACH: A distributed algorithm for multi-hop communication in wireless sensor networks. In: ICN 2014: The thirteenth international conference on networks (pp. 55–61).

  24. Alnawafa, E, & Marghescu, I. (2016). MHT: Multi-hop technique for the improvement of leach protocol. In: 2016 15th RoEduNet conference: Networking in education and research (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  25. Yektaparast, A., Nabavi, F. H., & Sarmast, A. (2012). An improvement on LEACH protocol (Cell-LEACH). p. 5.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude for the editors and reviewers for the valuable comments, which is helpful in improving the paper quality.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ikram Daanoune.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daanoune, I., Baghdad, A. IBRE-LEACH: Improving the Performance of the BRE-LEACH for Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 126, 3495–3513 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09876-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09876-8

Keywords

Navigation