Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gait Adaptive Duty Cycle: Optimize the QoS of WBSN-HAR

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To proliferate the traditional healthcare industry, the deep research is going on Wireless Body Sensor Network (WBSN). Many healthcare deployment models are designed for continuous and uninterrupted remote health monitoring system. But the Quality of Standard like energy, reliability and accuracy are to be pinned more. The Gait Adaptive Duty Cycle-Human Activity Recognition (GADC-HAR) is proposed with better performance in terms of energy, reliability and accuracy. To enhance the performance of model the two techniques were adopted: (i) design Energy Efficient and Reliable algorithm for the network coding (ii) optimization of sleep/wake timer to synchronise Controller Node with relay node. The performance validation is done with the real time implementation of GADC-HAR. The forty subjects (young and adult with same gender ratio) are examined with a 360 s activity pattern, a strategic process of self-optimization is adopted for gait cycle synchronization. At the end model is evaluated as 48.5% more energy efficient and packet loss ratio is reduced by 7.92%. Based on the gait cycle, population categories are sub-categorised in normal young/adult and fast young/adult subjects. GADC-HAR young normal 10.45%, young fast 11.28%, adult normal 25% and adult fast 25.13% were more accurate than WBSN-HAR generic model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Statistics 2 0 1 0. 2010.

  2. Ullah, S., & Kwak, K. S. (2011). Body area network for ubiquitous healthcare applications: Theory and implementation. Journal of Medical Systems, 35(5), 1243–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Custodio, V., Herrera, F. J., López, G., & Moreno, J. I. (2012). A review on architectures and communications technologies for wearable health-monitoring systems. Sensors (Switzerland), 12(10), 13907–13946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puspitaningayu, P., et al. (2018). “The Development of Wireless Body Area Network for Motion Sensing Application. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 336, 012014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Liolios, C. Doukas, G. Fourlas, and I. Maglogiannis (2010) “An overview of body sensor networks in enabling pervasive healthcare and assistive environments,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments - PETRA ’10, p. 1.

  6. V. M, K. SPR, ukuri SPR, and R. A,. (2015). Node level energy efficiency protocol for internet of things. J. Theor. Comput. Sci., 03(01), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rault, T., Bouabdallah, A., & Challal, Y. (2014). Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top-down survey. Comput. Networks, 67(March), 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Premkumar, K., Padmapriya, S., Priyadharshani, R., & Priyanka, K. (2018). A SURVEY ON HEALTHCARE MONITORING SYSTEM USING WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS (WSN). Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 118(14), 485–492.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Camilo Correa-Chica, J., Felipe Botero-Vega, J., & Gaviria-Gómez, N. (2017). Cross-layer designs for energy efficient wireless body area networks: a review. Rev. Téc. Ing. Univ. Zulia, 40, 98–120.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sodhro, A. H., Chen, L., Sekhari, A., Ouzrout, Y., & Wu, W. (2018). Energy efficiency comparison between data rate control and transmission power control algorithms for wireless body sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Networks, 14(1), 155014771775003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gravina, R., Alinia, P., Ghasemzadeh, H., Fortino, G., Raffaele Gravina, G. F., Alinia, P., & Ghasemzadeh, H. (2017). Multi-sensor fusion in body sensor networks: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Inf. Fusion, 35, 1339–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marinkovic, S., & Popovici, E. (2012). Ultra low power signal oriented approach for wireless health monitoring. Sensors, 12(12), 7917–7937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gravina, R., Alinia, P., Ghasemzadeh, H., & Fortino, G. (2017). Multi-sensor fusion in body sensor networks: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Inf. Fusion, 35, 1339–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giancarlo Fortino, W. L., Galzarano, S., & Gravina, R. (2015). A framework for collaborative computing and multi-sensor data fusion in body sensor networks. Inf. Fusion, 22, 50–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. M. Tjensvold, (2007) “Comparison of the IEEE 802.11, 802.15.1, 802.15.4 and 802.15.6 wireless standards.

  16. Anastasi, G., Conti, M., Di Francesco, M., & Passarella, A. (2009). Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(3), 537–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Alshaheen and H. T. Rizk, (2017) “Improving the energy efficiency for a WBSN based on a coordinate duty cycle and network coding,” in 2017 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), pp. 1215–1220.

  18. B. P. L. Lo, S. Thiemjarus, R. King, and G. Yang (2005) “Body Sensor Network - A Wireless Sensor Platform for Pervasive Healthcare Monitoring,” Adjun. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Pervasive Comput. (PERVASIVE’05, pp. 77–80.

  19. Jovanov, E., & Milenkovic, A. (2011). Body area networks for ubiquitous healthcare applications: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Medical Systems, 35(5), 1245–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adame, T., Bel, A., Carreras, A., Melia-Segui, J., Oliver, M., & Pous, R. (2018). CUIDATS: An RFID–WSN hybrid monitoring system for smart health care environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 602–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Janidarmian, M., Roshan Fekr, A., Radecka, K., & Zilic, Z. (2017). A comprehensive analysis on wearable acceleration sensors in human activity recognition. Sensors, 17(3), 529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Devapriya, M., & Sudha, R. (2012). A survey on wireless body sensor networks for health care monitoring. International Journal of Science and Research ISSN, 3(9), 2319–7064.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ghamari, M., Janko, B., Sherratt, R. S., Harwin, W., Piechockic, R., & Soltanpur, C. (2016). A survey on wireless body area networks for ehealthcare systems in residential environments. Sensors (Switzerland), 16(6), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boudargham, N., Abdo, J. B., Demerjian, J., Guyeux, C., & Makhoul, A. (2018). “Collaborative body sensor networks: Taxonomy and open challenges”, in. IEEE Middle East and North Africa Communications Conference (MENACOMM), 2018, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Otto, C., Milenković, A., Sanders, C., & Jovanov, E. (2006). System architecture of a wireless body area sensor network for ubiquitous health monitoring. Journal of Mobile Multimedia, 1(4), 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Milenković, A., Otto, C., & Jovanov, E. (2006). Wireless sensor networks for personal health monitoring: Issues and an implementation. Computer Communications, 29(13–14), 2521–2533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zang, W., & Li, Y. (2018). Gait-cycle-driven transmission power control scheme for a wireless body area network. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(3), 697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bovi, G., Rabuffetti, M., Mazzoleni, P., & Ferrarin, M. (2011). A multiple-task gait analysis approach: Kinematic, kinetic and EMG reference data for healthy young and adult subjects. Gait & Posture, 33(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Khandelwal, S., & Wickström, N. (2017). Evaluation of the performance of accelerometer-based gait event detection algorithms in different real-world scenarios using the MAREA gait database. Gait & Posture, 51, 84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Martinez-Hernandez, U., & Dehghani-Sanij, A. A. (2018). Adaptive Bayesian inference system for recognition of walking activities and prediction of gait events using wearable sensors. Neural Networks, 102, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Park, S.-H., Cho, S., & Lee, J.-R. (2014). Energy-efficient probabilistic routing algorithm for internet of things. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hauer, J.-H. (2014). Leveraging human mobility for communication in body area networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Networks, 10(3), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dias, G. M., Adame, T., Bellalta, B., & Oechsner, S. (2016). “A self-managed architecture for sensor networks based on real time data analysis”, in. Future Technologies Conference (FTC), 2016, 1297–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. vidhyotma Gandhi; Jaiteg Singh. (2019). Optimization of WBSN deployment model for biophysical data recording and communication. Journal of Advance Research Dynamic Control System, 11(02), 1523–1532.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Chandigarh, Punjab, India

    Vidhyotma Gandhi & Jaiteg Singh

Authors
  1. Vidhyotma Gandhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaiteg Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidhyotma Gandhi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gandhi, V., Singh, J. Gait Adaptive Duty Cycle: Optimize the QoS of WBSN-HAR. Wireless Pers Commun 123, 1967–1985 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09224-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09224-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation