Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance Evaluation of an Effective Mobility Model for D2D Communications

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Device-to-Device (D2D) communication, in which devices take advantage of their physical proximity, becomes an emerging technology and a hot research area for 5G cellular networks. Many research works have thoroughly tried to deal with interference management, resource allocation, security, opportunistic device contacts and user mobility. However, unpredictable device mobility may influence the service continuity of a D2D communication. Therefore, the effects of the mobility model on D2D communication performances must be fully studied. In this paper, we adapt the RPGM (Reference Point Group Mobility), a group mobility model, to the D2D communication. It is suitable for modelling the D2D mobility and manages the relationship among mobile devices. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our adopted mobility model, we compare it to other popular mobility models. As expected, our adopted mobility model outperforms the other models in terms of handover latency and system performances with different D2D applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 3GPP. Tr 22.803: Feasibility study for proximity services (prose) (release 12). Technical report, June 2013.

  2. Orsino, A., Moltchanov, D., Gapeyenko, M., Samuylov, A., Andreev, S., Militano, L., et al. (2016). Direct connection on the move: Characterization of user mobility in cellular-assisted d2d systems. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 11(3), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bettstetter, C., Wagner, C., et al. (2002). The spatial node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model. WMAN, 11, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ariyakhajorn, J., Wannawilai, P., & Sathitwiriyawong, C. (2006). A comparative study of random waypoint and Gauss–Markov mobility models in the performance evaluation of MANET. In International symposium on communications and information technologies. ISCIT ’06, Bangkok, Oct. 18–Sept. 20 2006 (pp. 894–899). IEEE.

  5. Groenevelt, R., Altman, E., & Nain, P. (2006). Relaying in mobile ad hoc networks: The Brownian motion mobility model. Wireless Networks, 12(5), 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nabi, M., Geilen, M., & Basten, T. (2011). Moban: A configurable mobility model for wireless body area networks. In Proceedings of the 4th international ICST conference on simulation tools and techniques (pp. 168–177).

  7. Musolesi, M., & Mascolo, C. (2006). A community based mobility model for ad hoc network research. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on multi-hop ad hoc networks: From theory to reality (pp. 31–38). ACM.

  8. Hong, X., Gerla, M., Pei, G., & Chiang, C.-C. (1999). A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems (MSWIM) (pp. 53–60). ACM.

  9. Kaur, R. (2006). Connection probability in reference point group mobility model. PhD thesis, B.Tech in Electrical & Computer Engineering, India, December 2006.

  10. Ouali, K., Kassar, M., Nguyen, T. M. T., Sethom, K., & Kervella, B. (2017). Modeling d2d handover management in 5g cellular networks. In 2017 13th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 196–201). IEEE.

  11. SimuLTE. http://www.simulte.com.

  12. OMNeT++. Network simulator. http://www.omnetpp.org/.

  13. Virdis, A., Nardini, G., & Stea, G. (2016). Modeling unicast device-to-device communications with simulte. In International workshop on link-and system level simulations (IWSLS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  14. Chen, H.-Y., Shih, M.-J., & Wei, H.-Y. (2015). Handover mechanism for device-to-device communication. In 2015 IEEE conference on standards for communications and networking (CSCN) (pp. 72–77). IEEE.

  15. Chandhar, P., Danev, D., & Larsson, E. G. (2018). Massive MIMO for communications with drone swarms. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(3), 1604–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ouali, K., Kassar, M., & Sethom, K. (2018). Handover performance analysis for managing d2d mobility in 5g cellular networks. IET Communications, 12(15), 1925–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaouthar Ouali.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ouali, K., Kassar, M., Nguyen, T.M.T. et al. Performance Evaluation of an Effective Mobility Model for D2D Communications. Wireless Pers Commun 116, 2675–2696 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07816-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07816-y

Keywords

Navigation