Skip to main content
Log in

ACO–MKFCM: An Optimized Object Detection and Tracking Using DNN and Gravitational Search Algorithm

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object tracking is a dynamic optimization process based on the temporal information related to the previous frames. Proposing a method with higher precision in complex environments is a challenge for researchers in the field of study. In this research, efficient object detection and movement tracking video is proposed. Here we are considering the input video sequence is PETS and Hall monitor video. Kernel fuzzy c-means procedure still endures several downsides, such as reduced convergence rate, obtaining stuck in the local minima as well as at risk to initialization level of sensitivity. Ant colony optimization algorithm is a new population-based optimization technique that has actually been utilized effectively for resolving numerous complicated difficulties. This research suggested a new strategy called ACO–MKFCM to resolve MKFCM initialization issue making use of ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm to locate optimum first cluster centres for the MKFCM, hence enhance all applications associated fuzzy clustering such as foreground segmentation in image processing. Initially, the background and foreground separation is done by hybridization of modified kernel fuzzy c means algorithm (MKFCM) with ant colony optimization. The recommended new technique is intellectual and also vibrant clustering method for splitting up of non-static object. Then object detection and tracking is done by gravitational search algorithm based deep belief neural network. The implementation will be in MATLAB. The performance of the suggested technique is appraised by means of precision, recall, F-measure, FPR, FNR, PWC, FAR, similarity, specificity, and accuracy. From the empirical effects, the future work outperforms than the state of art work. Here the proposed method attains maximum precision and recall value for both PETS and Hall monitor video when analyzed to the existent algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Sabirin, H., & Kim, M. (2012). Moving object detection and tracking using a spatio-temporal graph in H. 264/AVC bit streams for video surveillance. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia,14(3), 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, S., Wang, C., Chan, S.-C., Wei, X., & Ho, C.-H. (2015). New object detection, tracking, and recognition approaches for video surveillance over camera network. IEEE Sensors Journal,15(5), 2679–2691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai, L., He, L., Xu, Y., Zhao, Y., & Yang, X. (2010). Multi-object detection and tracking by stereo vision. Pattern Recognition,43(12), 4028–4041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, Y., Shen, Y., Liu, X., & Zhong, B. (2015). 3D object tracking via image sets and depth-based occlusion detection. Signal Processing,112, 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Subudhi, B. N., Nanda, P. K., & Ghosh, A. (2011). A change information based fast algorithm for video object detection and tracking. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology,21(7), 993–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. del-Blanco, C. R., Jaureguizar, F., & Garcia, N. (2012). An efficient multiple object detection and tracking framework for automatic counting and video surveillance applications. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics,58(3), 857–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanagamalliga, S., & Vasuki, S. (2018). Contour-based object tracking in video scenes through optical flow and gabor features. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics,157, 787–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Riahi, D., & Bilodeau, G.-A. (2016). Online multi-object tracking by detection based on generative appearance models. Computer Vision and Image Understanding,152, 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian, S., Yuan, F., & Xia, G.-S. (2016). Multi-object tracking with inter-feedback between detection and tracking. Neuro Computing,171, 768–780.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mahalingam, T., & Subramoniam, M. (2019). A competent frame work for efficient object detection, tracking and classification. Wireless Personal Communications, 107(2), 939–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mirunalini, P., Jaisakthi, S. M., & Sujana, R. (2017). Tracking of object in occluded and non-occluded environment using SIFT and Kalman Filter. In 2017 IEEE region 10 conference (TENCON) (pp. 1290–1295).

  12. Hu, W.-C., Chen, C.-H., Chen, T.-Y., Huang, D.-Y., & Wu, Z.-C. (2015). Moving object detection and tracking from video captured by moving camera. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation,30, 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prasad, D. K., Rajan, D., Rachmawati, L., Rajabally, E., & Quek, C. (2017). Video processing from electro-optical sensors for object detection and tracking in a maritime environment: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,18(8), 1993–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Azab, M. M., Shedeed, H. A., & Hussein, A. S. (2014). New technique for online object tracking-by-detection in video. IET Image Processing,8(12), 794–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehdizadeh, E., & Golabzaei, A. (2016). Electrical fuzzy C-means: A new heuristic fuzzy clustering algorithm. Journal Cogent Engineering,3(1), 1208397.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benabdellah, N. C., Gharbi, M., & Bellafkih, M. (2013). Learner’s profile definition: Fuzzy logic application. International Journal of Computer Science and Electronics Engineering,1(4), 542–546.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Benabdellah, N. C., Gharbi, M., & Bellafkih, M. (2013). Content adaptation and learner profi le defi nition: Ant colony algorithm application. Phil. Sita13, IEEExplorer.

  18. Ruan, C., Jaggi, J., Xue, J., & Fadili, D. Bloyet. (2010). Brain tissue classifi cation of magnetic resonance images using partial volume modeling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,19(12), 1179–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heimann, T., & Meinzer, H. P. (2009). Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review. Medical Image Analysis,13(4), 543–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klauschen, F., Goldman, A., Barra, V., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., & Lundervold, A. (2009). Evaluation of auto-mated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods. Human Brain Mapping,30(4), 1310–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pintea, C. M., & Ticala, C. (2016). Medical image processing: A brief survey and a new theoretical hybrid ACO model. Combinations of Intelligent Methods and Applications (pp. 117–134). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Agarwal, P., Singh, R., & Agarw, P. (2015). A Combination of bias-field corrected fuzzy c-means and level set approach for brain mri image segmentation. In IEEE international conference on soft computing and machine intelligence.

  23. Xu, X., Liang, T., Wang, G., & Wang, M. (2016). Self-adaptive PCNN based on the ACO algorithm and its application on medical image segmentation. Journal of Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing,23(2), 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulez, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Maniezzo, V., & Conlorni, A. (1999). The ant system applied to the quadratic assignment problem. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,11(5), 769–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., & Colorni, A. (1996). The ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B,26(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shuai, H., Liu, Q., Zhang, K., Yang, J., & Deng, J. (2017). Cascaded regional spatio-temporal feature-routing networks for video object detection. IEEE Access,6, 3096–3106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, S., Yu, X., Sui, Y., Zhao, S., & Zhang, L. (2015). Object tracking with multi-view support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia,17(3), 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Laumer, M., Amon, P., Hutter, A., & Kaup, A. (2016). Moving object detection in the H. 264/AVC compressed domain. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing,5, e18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pawaskar, M. C., Narkhede, N. S., & Athalye, S. S. (2014). Detection of moving object based on background subtraction. International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science,7(3), 215–218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Mahalingam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahalingam, T., Subramoniam, M. ACO–MKFCM: An Optimized Object Detection and Tracking Using DNN and Gravitational Search Algorithm. Wireless Pers Commun 110, 1567–1604 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06802-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06802-3

Keywords

Navigation