Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Specifying the Optimal Transmission Manner in WSNs: Analysis and Simulation

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employing multi-hop transmission (MH) in wireless sensor networks achieves the uniform distribution of energy cost between nodes. However, the minimum energy cost isn’t completely guaranteed. Therefore, in several cases, the total energy cost might be greater than direct transmission (DT). In this paper, we are interested in determining the factors that influence choosing the efficient transmission manner. It’s assumed that there is a judging metric, called characteristic distance \(d_{char}\) that specifies whether to use DT or MH. If the transmission distance is greater than \(d_{char}\) MH is used, else DT is preferred. The previous conclusion is obtained through the following three steps: The first step is to analyze the relation between the radio hardware parameters and the consumed energy of the different transmission techniques. Hence, a general law for \(d_{char}\) will be deduced. Secondly, a supplementary analysis will be performed to understand the effect of these parameters on \(d_{char}\). Finally, a great concern is paid to estimate efficient design of cluster size in cluster-based routing protocols. Therefore, \(d_{char}\) and the radio hardware parameters are exploited in specifying the optimum size of the cluster. The proposed design consumes the least energy cost and minimizes the variance of nodes residual energy in comparison with DT, MH and normal clustering. This helps in avoiding energy hole problem and enhancing the network lifetime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li, Y., & Thai, M. T. (2008). Wireless sensor networks and applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, G., Shen, W., & Wang, X. (2014). Applications of wireless sensor networks in marine environment monitoring: a survey. Sensors, 14(9), 16932–16954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, N. (2002). A survey of sensor network applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8), 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akkaya, K., & Younis, M. (2005). A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3), 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Karaki, J. N., & Kamal, A. E. (2004). Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 11(6), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on System sciences. IEEE.

  7. Fawzy, A. E., Shokair, M., & Saad, W. (2017). Balanced and energy-efficient multi-hop techniques for routing in wireless sensor networks. IET Networks, 7(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, X. (2012). A survey on clustering routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 12(8), 11113–11153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh, S. K., Singh, M., & Singh, D. (2010). A survey of energy-efficient hierarchical cluster-based routing in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Application (IJANA), 2(02), 570–580.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wei, C., et al. (2001). Cluster-based routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: a survey. In 2011 international conference on computer science and network technology (ICCSNT), IEEE.

  11. Mundada, M. R., CyrilRaj, V., & Bhuvaneswari, T. (2012). Energy aware multi-hop multi-path hierarchical (EAMMH) routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. European Journal of Scientific Research, 88(4), 520–530.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiangning, F., Yulin, S. (2007). Improvement on LEACH protocol of wireless sensor network. In International conference on sensor technologies and applications, 2007. SensorComm 2007, IEEE.

  14. Saadat, M., Saadat, R., & Mirjalily, G. (2010). Improving threshold assignment for cluster head selection in hierarchical wireless sensor networks. In 2010 5th international symposium on telecommunications (IST), IEEE.

  15. Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., & Bestavros, A. (2004). SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Boston University Computer Science Department.

  16. Qing, L., Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2006). Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29(12), 2230–2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye, M. et al. (2005). EECS: an energy efficient clustering scheme in wireless sensor networks. In 24th IEEE international performance, computing, and communications conference, 2005. IPCCC 2005. IEEE.

  18. Chen, G., et al. (2009). An unequal cluster-based routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 15(2), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mao, Y., & Jie, W. (2005). An energy-efficient unequal clustering mechanism for wireless sensor networks. In Proceeding of international conference on mobile ad hoc and sensor system conference.

  20. Manjeshwar, A., & Agrawal, D. P. (2001). TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In Null, IEEE.

  21. Manjeshwar, A., & Agrawal, D. P. (2002). APTEEN: A hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In IPDPS. IEEE.

  22. Mahmood, D., et al. (2013). MODLEACH: a variant of LEACH for WSNs. In 2013 eighth international conference on broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications (BWCCA). IEEE.

  23. Chakraborty, S., & Khan, A. K. (2014). Locoduo-low cost dual hop clustering based routing protocol for wireless sensor network. In 2014 fourth international conference on communication systems and network technologies (CSNT). IEEE.

  24. Wang, J. (2010). Hop-based energy aware routing scheme for wireless sensor networks. Ph.D. Thesis, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

  25. Ergen, S. C., & Varaiya, P. (2005). On multi-hop routing for energy efficiency. IEEE Communications Letters, 9(10), 880–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bachir, A., et al. (2010). MAC essentials for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(2), 222–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qasem, A. A., et al. (2017). Energy efficient intra cluster transmission in grid clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(1), 915–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abd Elwahab Fawzy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fawzy, A.E., Shokair, M. & Saad, W. Specifying the Optimal Transmission Manner in WSNs: Analysis and Simulation. Wireless Pers Commun 103, 1657–1675 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5873-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5873-4

Keywords

Navigation