A Simple and Enriched Closed-Form Formula for Cell Residence Time in 5G Heterogeneous Networks
- 24 Downloads
Cell residence time is a key system parameter for the performance analysis of cellular mobile systems and their related applications. In order to save cost and time before wide implementation and deployment of a mobile system, various network performance metrics, such as network resource occupancy probabilities, should be calculated through analytical results of the mean cell residence time. However, this is difficult to estimate in 5G heterogeneous networks, due to irregular-shaped multi-tier heterogeneous network topologies introduced by a diverse set of small cells. In order to find an efficient way of calculating the cell residence time for 5G heterogeneous networks, we first examine the well-known conventional formula. Then we propose an enhanced closed-form formula for cell residence time by considering more generalized cellular mobile systems, as well as more generic mobility models. The proposed closed-form formula can be directly applied to various complex and reliable network scenarios. It can be adapted to multi-tier heterogeneous networks with randomly positioned irregular-shaped small cells, even though they overlap with each other. Our simulation results show that the proposed formula provides excellent estimation accuracy for general random mobility models, including the Levy walk, which is known to realistically reflect human mobility.
KeywordsModeling and analysis Multi-tier heterogeneous networks Cell residence time Handover rate User mobility General random walk
This work was partly supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03932696 and NRF-2017R1D1A1B04027874) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2017R1A2B4006026).
- 4.Corral-Ruiz, A. L. E., Cruz-Perez, F. A., Hernandez-Valdez, G., & Eksim, A. (2012). Cell dwell time and channel holding time relationship in mobile cellular networks. In A. Eksim (Ed.), Wireless communications and networks—Recent advances, InTech. Rijeka. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/wireless-communications-and-networks-recent-advances/cell-dwell-andchannel-holding-times-relationships-in-cellular-networks.
- 5.Hermann, S. D., Wolisz, A., & Sortais, M. (2006). Expected number of area exits, entrances and crossovers for the investigation of area based push service utilization. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICN/ICONS/MCL 2006 (pp. 136–142).Google Scholar
- 8.Navaratnarajah, S., Dianati, M., & Imran, M. A. (2015). Performance analysis of Cellular-WLAN heterogeneous network based on continuous time markov chain. In Proceedings of the IEEE CAMAD 2015 (pp. 221–225).Google Scholar
- 9.Xie, H., & Goodman, D. J. (1993). Mobility models and biased sampling problem. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICUPC93 (Vol. 2, pp. 803–807).Google Scholar
- 13.Zola, E., & Barcelo-Arroyo, F. (2009). Impact of mobility models on the cell residence time in WLAN networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE SARNOFF09 (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
- 19.Casares-Giner, V., Pla, V., & Escalle-Garca, P. (2011). Mobility models for mobility management. In Proceedings of the Springer Network performance engineering (pp. 716–745). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- 26.Cox, D. R. (1969). Some sampling problems in technology. In N. L. Johnson & H. Smith Jr. (Eds.), New developments in survey sampling (pp. 506–527). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 27.Papoulis, A., & Pillai, S. U. (2002). One function of two random variables. In Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes (Ch. 6–2, pp. 180–197), McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar