Distributed Wireless Liquid Level Control of a Process Simulator Over a Network
- 30 Downloads
In a process simulator, the distributed wireless liquid level control experiments have been performed by using the generalized predictive control algorithm. The wireless local area network was established with antennas between process simulator in Unit Operations Laboratory and the computer in Process Control Laboratory. We performed the online wireless experiments with MATLAB/Simulink program. Data transfer during the wireless experiments were carried out using radio waves at a frequency of 2.4 GHz. Experiments on the same conditions were achieved by three certain values of control weighting factor in the controller algorithm, whilst the changes in valve opening and liquid level with time were monitored. In all experiments performed with the distributed control system, the control valve opening is fixed with very small oscillations after a sudden increase in the beginning. We obtained the best liquid level control response to different set point changes for the same set of controller tuning values. The Integrated Square of the Error and the Integrated Absolute of the Error values were chosen as performance criteria. The distributed wireless liquid level control was effectively realized to the process simulator and it is recommended for industrial applications.
KeywordsDistributed wireless control GPC algorithm Liquid level control Performance criteria
- 1.Cara, D. (2008). Wireless networks for industrial automation. In ISA-the instrumentation, systems and automation society, 2008.Google Scholar
- 3.Chen, D., Nixon, M., Aneweer, T., Shepard, R., & Mok, A. (2004). Middleware for wireless process control systems, Wacerts. http://wacerts.di.fc.ul.pt/papers/Session1-ChenMok.pdf.
- 11.Aldemir, A., & Hapoğlu, H. (2016). Comparison of wireless temperature profiles with generalized predictive control. Journal of Polytechnic, 19(3), 377–388.Google Scholar
- 12.Bayram, İ. (2015). Wireless liquid level control with advanced control methods. Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University, Institute of Science, Ankara, 2015.Google Scholar
- 18.Bayram, I., Giwa, A., & Karacan, S. (2011). Nonlinear generalized predictive control of a distillation column. In Automatic control national meeting, DokuzEylül University, İzmir, The Book of Proclamations, pp. 370–375, September 14–16, 2011 (TOK 2011).Google Scholar
- 20.Majdoul, A., Haloua, M., & Youlal, H. (1991). Generalized predictive control of an industrial calcination reactor. In Advanced control of chemical processes, IFAC symposium, October 14–16, Toulouse, France, 1991.Google Scholar
- 22.Bursalı, N., Akay, B., Ertunç, S., Hapoğlu, H., & Alpbaz, M. (2001). New tuning method for generalized predictive control of the production of S. Cerevisiae. Trans IChemE, 79, 27–34.Google Scholar
- 26.Chen, W. (2016). Improved distributed model predictive control with control planning set. Journal of Control Science and Engineering, ID8167931.Google Scholar
- 28.P3005 Process Control Simulator hand book.Google Scholar