Improved Connection Establishment of Dynamic Traffic with Queue in WDM Optical Networks

  • Shrinivas Petale
  • Rakesh Kumar Maurya
  • Jaisingh Thangaraj
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Proper route selection between source and destination \((s-d)\) connection leads to efficient resource utilization which leads to the availability of resources for future call arrivals. Various choices are available for Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA) and every network demands a particular set of RWA to face least call blocking. Call blocking is an important issue in WDM network since it decides the provision of efficient service. In this paper, we have proposed the solution for RWA problem, efficient Wavelength Assignment Technique (WAT) and effect of call queuing in the network. We have studied and compared all sets of RWA over 14 nodes NSF network and found out that our proposed WAT works better in every set. Call blocking is a function of time and a slight change in time shows noticeable effects. We have shown the effect of call contention on WDM network and hence proposed the optimum value of it. Our simulation results for dynamic traffic show that optimal selection of RWA and contention window improve blocking of connections.

Keywords

Adaptive wavelength assignment Blocking performance RWA Wavelength assignment Resource allocation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the thanks and support provided to us by Department of Electronics Engineering of Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, India.

References

  1. 1.
    Murthy, C. S. R., & Gurusamy, M. (2002). WDM optical networks: Concepts, design and algorithms (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birman, A. & Kershenbaum, A. (1995). Routing and wavelength assignment methods in single-hop all-optical networks with blocking. In INFOCOM’95 fourteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies, bringing information to people, proceedings, IEEE (Vol. 2). IEEE.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thangaraj, J., Mankar, P. D., & Datta, Raja. (2010). Improved shared resource allocation strategy with SLA for survivability in WDM optical networks. Journal of Optics, 39(2), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu, J. Q. & Leida, B. (2004). Traffic grooming, routing and wavelength assignment in optical WDM mesh networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (Vol. 4, pp. 495–501).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xin, C. (2007). Blocking analysis of dynamic traffic grooming in mesh WDM optical networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 15, 721–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Betker, A., Gerlach, C., Hlsermann, R., Jger, M., Barry, M., Bodamer, S., Spth, J., Gauger, C., & Khn, M. (2004). Reference transport network scenarios. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), MultiTeraNet project under contract numbers 01 BP 254, 01 BP 256, and 01 BP 289.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barry, R. A. & Humblet, P. A. (1995). Models of blocking probability in all-optical networks with and without wavelength changers. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM95 (Vol. 2, pp. 402–412).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tornatore, M., Baruffaldi, A., Zhu, H., Mukherjee, B., & Pattavina, A. (2007). Dynamic traffic grooming of subwavelength connections with known duration. In Proc. IEEE OFC/NOFC07 (Vol. 1, pp. 1–3).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yao, W., & Ramamurthy, B. (2005). A link bundled auxiliary graph model for constrained dynamic traffic grooming in WDM mesh networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23, 1542–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, S., & Dutta, R. (2007). Dynamic traffic grooming: The changing role of traffic grooming. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 1, 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramaswami, R., & Sivarajan, K. (1998). Optical networks: A practical perspective. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen, G., et al. (2001). Efficient heuristic algorithms for light-path routing and wavelength assignment in WDM networks under dynamically varying loads. Computer Communications, 24.3, 364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Birman, A. (1996). Computing approximate blocking probabilities for a class of all-optical networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 14(5), 852–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vardakas, J. S., Vassilakis, V. G., & Logothetis, M. D. (2007). Calculating blocking probabilities in single-hop WDM traffic groomed optical networks. In ICTON’07 9th international conference on transparent optical networks, 2007 (Vol. 4). IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Medhi, J. (1991). Stochastic models in queueing theory (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maurya, R. K., Thangaraj, J., & Priye, V. (2016). Statistical analysis of blocking probability for dynamic traffic in WDM optical networks based on Erlang B model. In International conference on wireless communications, signal processing and networking (WiSPNET). IEEE.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Charbonneau, N., & Vokkarane, V. M. (2012). A survey of advance reservation routing and wavelength assignment in wavelength-routed WDM networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1037–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jukan, A. (2001). QoS-based wavelength routing in multi-service WDM networks. Vienna: Springer-Verlag/Wien.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rouskas, G. N., Zhu, Y., & Perros, H. G. (1999). Blocking in wavelength routing networks I: The single path case. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM99 (Vol. 1, pp. 321–328).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelly, F. P. (1986). Blocking probabilities in large circuit-switched networks. Advances in Applied Probability, 18, 473–505.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zang, H., Jue, J. P., & Mukherjee, B. (2000). A review of routing and wavelength assignment approaches for wavelength-routed optical WDM networks. SPIE /BALTZERS Optical Networks Magazine, 1, 47–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shrinivas Petale
    • 1
  • Rakesh Kumar Maurya
    • 1
  • Jaisingh Thangaraj
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations