Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic TXOP Assignment in IEEE802.11e Multi-hop Wireless Networks Based on an Admission Control Method

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no network traffic classification in intermediate nodes in IEEE802.11e multi-hop wireless network, which results in delays for the traffic with higher levels of service. Also, there is no mechanism to support fairness in a shared environment with different classes of service, which leads to inappropriate quality of service. Previous studies were focused on improving network throughput and also the fairness among the traffic that belongs to one class of service and there is no solution for providing fairness among different classes of service in each individual node. In this paper, a new method is proposed for scheduling the traffic in each intermediate node which is based on Transmission Opportunity (TXOP). The new method ensures differentiated quality of service for service classes as well as improvement of throughput and end to end delay. Using dynamic TXOP along with the proposed method can provide desired quality of service as well as fairness in the bandwidth shared between different classes of services. Simulation results illustrate network throughput and end to end delay improvement for each class of service, in the case of using the proposed method, as well as fairness in using the shared bandwidth which leads to more efficient use of network resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEEE 802.11 working group. (2007) IEEE 802.11, IEEE standard for information technology telecommunications and information exchange between systems local and metropolitan area networks specific requirements. Part 11: wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications.

  2. Rashwand, S., & Misˇic, J. (2012). Stable operation of IEEE 802.11e EDCA: Interaction between offered load and MAC parameters. Ad Hoc Networks, Elsevier, 10(2), 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, J., Chen, Y. P., & Marsic, I. (2010). MAC-layer proactive mixing for network coding in multi-hop wireless networks. Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, 54(2), 196–207.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Yazanea, T., Masuyamaa, H., Kasahara, Sh, & Takahashi, Y. (2012). Effect of network-coding overhead on end-to-end throughput for multi-hop wireless networks. Performance Evaluation, Elsevier, 70(1), 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pavon, J. P., Choi, S. (2003). Link adaptation strategy for IEEE 802.11 WLAN via received signal strength measurement. In Communications, 2003. ICC ‘03. IEEE International Conference on, (Vol. 2, pp. 1108–1113), 11–15 May 2003.

  6. Ferro, J. M., Orlando Cabral, O., & Velez, F. J. (2011). A cross-layer multi-hop simulator for IEEE 802.11e. Wireless Personal Communications, Springer, 58(3), 545–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cecchetti, G., Lina Ruscelli, A., Mastropaolo, A. & Lipari, G. (2012). Providing variable TXOP for IEEE 802.11e HCCA real-time networks. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), IEEE, (pp. 1508–1513), 1–4 April 2012.

  8. Tariq, A. S. M. & Perveen, K. (2010). Contention window analysis and proposed algorithm for collision minimization of IEEE 802.11e EDCA. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 1, San Francisco, USA.

  9. Xiaobo, Y., Navaratnam, P., & Moessner, K. (2013). Resource reservation schemes for IEEE 802.11-based wireless networks: A survey. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 15(3), 1042–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu, Q., Chen, Z., Jiang, Y., & LI, R. (2014). A cross-layer QoS scheme based on EDCA in Multi-hop wireless mesh networks. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 10(2), 817–825.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Takahashi, A., Komuro, N., Sakata, S., Shioda, S. & Murase, T. (2010) Receiving opportunity control used admission control scheme for wireless multi-hop networks. In Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), International Conference on, (pp. 1–6), 11–12 May 2010.

  12. Kaur, D., & Arora, V. (2012). Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11e QOS enhancements. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2(6), 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tainaka, T., Masuyama, H., Kasahara, Sh, & Takahashi, Y. (2011). Performance analysis of burst transmission mechanism for IEEE 802.11-based multi-hop wireless LANs. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(9), 2908–2917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chrysostomou, C., Djouvas, C. & Lambrinos, L. (2012). Dynamically adjusting the min-max contention window for providing QoS in vehicular networks. In Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (Med-Hoc-Net), 2012 The 11th Annual Mediterranean, (pp. 16–23), 19–22 June 2012.

  15. Al-Hubaishi, M., Alahdal, T., Alsaqour, R., Berqia, A., Abdelhaq, M. & Alsaqour, O. (2014). Enhanced binary exponential backoff algorithm for fair channel access in the IEEE802.11 medium access control protocol. In International journal of communication systems, Wiley, Vol. 27, No. 12, pp. 4166–4184, December 2014.

  16. Moraes, R., Portugal, P., Vasques, F., & Cust´odio, R. F. (2010). Assessment of the IEEE 802.11e EDCA protocol limitations when dealing with real-time communication. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2010, 351–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, S., & Cho, Y. J. (2013). Adaptive transmission opportunity scheme based on delay bound and network load in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, Elsevier, 11(4), 604–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, E. & Suh, Y. J. (2004) ATXOP: An adaptive TXOP based on the data rate to guarantee fairness for IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs. In Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004 IEEE 60th, (Vol. 4, pp. 2678–2682), 26–29 September 2004.

  19. Guo, N., Chen, C. & Pei, C. X. (2006) Dynamic TXOP assignment for fairness (DTAF) in IEEE 802.11e WLAN under heavy load conditions. In Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, 2006. PDCAT ‘06. Seventh International Conference on, (pp. 80–85), December 2006.

  20. Ahn, Y. W., Baek, J., Cheng, A. M. K., Fisher, P. S., & Jo, M. (2011). A fair transmission opportunity by detecting and punishing the malicious wireless stations in IEEE 802.11e EDCA network. Systems Journal, IEEE, 5(4), 486–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu, J., Min, G., & Woodward, M. E. (2014). Performance analysis of a threshold-based dynamic TXOP scheme for intra-AC QoS in wireless LANs. Future Generation Computer Systems, Elsevier, 38, 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, J. Y., Hwang, H. Y., Shin, J. & Valaee, S. (2011) Distributed optimal TXOP control for throughput requirements in IEEE 802.11e wireless LAN. In Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on, (pp. 935–939), 11–14 September 2011.

  23. Huang, M. L., Lee, S., & Park, S. C. (2007) An adaptive EDCA TXOP with rate adaptation for QoS provision. In IMCAS’07 Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), (pp. 13–18).

  24. Huang, J.-J, Chang, C.-Y. & Ferng, H.-W. (2008). Flexible TXOP assignments for efficient QoS scheduling in IEEE 802.11e WLANs. In Wireless and Optical Communications Networks, 2008. WOCN ‘08. 5th IFIP International Conference on, (pp. 1–5), 5–7 May 2008.

  25. Lee, D., Ju, K., & Chung, K. (2012). Dynamic traffic prioritization and TXOP allocation in 802.11e based multihop wireless networks. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 12(2), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ju, K., Lee, D. and Chung, K. (2012). Dynamic TXOP allocation to support QoS based on channel conditions in wireless networks. In Computing Technology and Information Management (ICCM), 2012 8th International Conference on, (Vol. 2, pp. 721–724), 24–26 April 2012.

  27. Ghazvini, M., Movahedinia, N., & Jamshidi, K. (2013). GTXOP: A game theoretic approach for QoS provisioning using transmission opportunity tuning. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e62925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weng, Ch-E, & Hung, H.-L. (2014). Performance analysis of priority schemes for IEEE 802.11e wireless local area networks using multiple flows distributed weighted fair queuing algorithm. Universal Journal of Communications and Network, 2(1), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moghim, N., Safavi, S. M., & Hashemi, M. R. (2010). Performance evaluation of a new traffic engineering algorithm in NGN based on end-point admission control. IET Communications, 4(14), 1687–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neda Moghim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Namazi, M., Moghim, N., Ghazvini, M. et al. Dynamic TXOP Assignment in IEEE802.11e Multi-hop Wireless Networks Based on an Admission Control Method. Wireless Pers Commun 97, 749–772 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4535-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4535-2

Keywords

Navigation