Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Performance of Packet Scheduling Algorithms in LTE-A HetNets

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of usage of heterogeneous networks (HetNets) is about improving the LTE system performance by increasing the capacity and coverage of the Macro cell. In this paper, a performance comparison of various packet scheduling algorithms such as Proportional Fair, Maximum Largest Weighted Delay First and Exponential/Proportional Fair is studied in detail in the HetNets environment. The key performance indicators such as throughput, packet loss ratio, delay and fairness are considered to judge the performance of the scheduling algorithms. Various strategies such as increasing the number of Pico cells in the cell edge were used in the simulation for the performance evaluation study. The results achieved through various simulations show that adding Pico cells to the existing Macros enhances the overall system performance in addition to the various scheduling algorithms implemented in Macros. For reader’s convenience, various types of graphs have been used to represent the simulation results to better understand the performance metrics of various scheduling algorithms. Simulation results shows that overall system gain has increased because of adding Picos and thereby providing better coverage in the cell edge areas and thereby increasing the capacity of the network to provide better quality of service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holma, H., & Toskala, A. (2012). LTE-advanced 3GPP solution for IMT-advanced. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Al Kim, H. A., Barua, S., Ghosal, P., & Sandrasegaran, K. (2014). Macro with Pico cells (HetNets) system behaviour using well-known scheduling algorithms. International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN), 6(5), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu, R. Q., & Qian, Y. (2013). Comparison femto cell and pico cell key features. In: Heterogeneous cellular networks (2nd ed.). IEEE Press, Wiley.

  4. Yi, S. J., Chun, S., Lee, Y. D., Park, S. J., & Jung, S. H. (2012). Radio protocols for LTE and LTE-advanced. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu,B., Tian, H. & Xu, L. (2013) An efficient downlink packet scheduling algorithm for real time traffics in LTE systems. Consumer communications and networking conference (CCNC), 2013 IEEE (pp. 364–369).

  6. Jalali, A., Padovani, R., & Pankaj, R. (2000). Data throughput of CDMA-HDR a high efficiency-high data rate personal communication wireless system. IEEE 51st, Vehicular technology conference proceedings, 2000. VTC 2000, (pp. 1854–1858). Tokyo: Spring.

  7. Andrews, M., Kumaran, K., Ramanan, K., Stolyar, A., Whiting, P., & Vijayakumar, R. (2001). Providing quality of service over a shared wireless link. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 39, 150–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rhee, J.-H., Holtzman, J. M., & Kim, D. K. (2004). Performance analysis of the adaptive EXP/PF channel scheduler in an AMC/TDM system. Communications Letters, IEEE, 8, 497–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zyren, J., & McCoy, W. (2007). Overview of the 3GPP long term evolution physical layer. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., white paper. http://www.freescale.com/files/wireless_comm/doc/white_paper/3GPPEVOLUTIONWP.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2014.

  10. Basukala, R., Mohd Ramli, H.A., & Sandrasegaran, K. (2009). Performance analysis of EXP/PF and M-LWDF in downlink 3GPP LTE system. In: IEEE Conference 3-5 Nov. 2009. Kathmandu, Nepal.

  11. Qiu, X., & Chawla, K. (1999). On the performance of adaptive modulation in cellular systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 47, 884–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alfayly, A., Mkwawa, I.-H., Sun, L., & Ifeachor, E. (2012) QoE-based performance evaluation of scheduling algorithms over LTE. Globecom workshops (GC Wkshps), 2012 IEEE (pp. 1362–1366).

  13. Piro, G., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., Capozzi, F., & Camarda, P. (2011). Simulating LTE cellular systems: An open-source framework. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60, 498–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iturralde, M., Yahiya, T. A., Wei, A., & Beylot, A. (2011). Resource allocation using shapley value in LTE networks. 2011 IEEE 22nd international symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) (pp. 31–35).

  15. Jain, R., Chiu, D.-M., & Hawe, W. R. (1984). A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer system. Hudson: Eastern Research Laboratory, Digital Equipment Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ramli, H. A. M., Basukala, R., Sandrasegaran, K., & Patachaianand, R. (2009) Performance of well known packet scheduling algorithms in the downlink 3GPP LTE system. 2009 IEEE 9th Malaysia international conference on communications (MICC) (pp. 815–820).

  17. AL-Jaradat, H. (2013). On the performance of PF, MLWDF and EXP/PF algorithms in LTE. CIR World. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 8(1), 698–706.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haider Abdul Hassan Hadi Al Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Kim, H.A., Subramanian, R., Afroz, F. et al. Comparison of Performance of Packet Scheduling Algorithms in LTE-A HetNets. Wireless Pers Commun 97, 1947–1965 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4380-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4380-3

Keywords

Navigation