Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 86, Issue 4, pp 1845–1856 | Cite as

An Energy Efficient Vehicle to Pedestrian Communication Method for Safety Applications

Article

Abstract

In vehicular safety applications, vehicles exchange safety messages, which include vehicle’s speed, location, and so on. Based on these messages, the safety applications can take appropriate action. In order to increase reliability of the safety message, WAVE standard is being researched. The WAVE standard defines various procedure to support reliable safety message transmission. However, although the standard can support V2V accident avoidance, it overlooks a vehicle-to-pedestrian (V2P) accident since we do not have any support to exchange the safety messages between the pedestrians and vehicles. Nowadays, the pedestrians will be able to exchange the safety messages with vehicles through the mobile devices such as smartphone to avoid the V2P accidents. However, unlike vehicles, the mobile devices are energy-constrained since they work with limited batteries. Moreover, the reliability of the V2V safety applications can be decreased due to collision between safety messages transmitted from the mobile devices. In order to provide energy efficient V2P communication and reduce the collision between safety messages, a group based mobile device management method is required. In this paper, we therefore introduce our V2P accident avoidance scenario and propose energy efficient methods to enable the V2P communication based on Wi-Fi Direct technique which is a promising group-based wireless device management technique.

Keywords

VANET Safety application Pedestrian Wi-Fi direct Energy efficient 

References

  1. 1.
    Hurihara, T. M. et al. (2013). IEEE guide for wireless access in vehicular environments (WAVE)-architecture No. 1609.0.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eichler, S. (2007). Performance evaluation of The IEEE 802.11p WAVE communication standard. In VTC Fall 2007, Baltimore, USA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraemer, B. P. et al. (2010). Wireless access in vehicular environments (WAVE). No. IEEE P802.11p.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xinzhou, W., Radovan, M., Sichao, Y., Samir, A., James, M., Sue, B., & Wai-hoi, C. (2014). Cars talk to phones: A DSRC based vehicle-pedestrian safety System. In VTC Fall 2014, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anaya, J. J., Pierre, M., Oyunchimeg, S., Fawzi, N., & Naranjo, J. E. (2014). Vehicle to pedestrian communications for protection of vulnerable road Users. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2014, Dearborn, USA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniel, B., Bernd, S., Jens, E., Oliver, S., & Ilja, R. (2014). Vehicle and pedestrian collision prevention system based on smart video surveillance and C2I communication. In Intelligent transportation systems. Qingdao, China.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chika, S., Yasuhisa, N., & Takuya, H. (2008). Development of pedestrian-to-vehicle communication system prototype for pedestrian safety using both wide-area and direct communication. In Advanced information networking and applications. GinoWan, Japan.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chika, S., & Yasuhisa, N. (2008). Provision of information support by pedestrian-to-vehicle communication system. In ITS Telecommunications. Phuket, Thailand.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camps-Mur, D., Perez-Costaa, X., & Sallent-Ribes, S. (2011). Designing energy efficient access points with Wi-Fi direct. Computer Networks, 55(13), 2838–2855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lim, K.-W., Jung, W.-S., Kim, H., Han, J., & Ko, Y.-B. (2013). Enhanced power management for Wi-Fi direct. In Wireless communications and networking Conference 2013. Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daniel, C., Andres, G., & Pablo, S. (2013). Device-to-device communications with Wi-Fi direct: Overview and experimentation. Wireless Communications, 20(3), 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yufeng, D., Carlo, B., Claudio, C., Chiasserini, C. F., Paolo, G., Marco, R., Fabio, M., & Maura, T. (2014). Wi-Fi direct multi-group data dissemination for public safety. In World telecommunications congress. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atheros Communications. (2003). Power consumption and energy efficiency comparisons of WLAN products—White paper. Atheros Communications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguKorea

Personalised recommendations