Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 86, Issue 3, pp 1221–1240 | Cite as

Memory Efficient Routing Using Bloom Filters in Large Scale Sensor Networks

  • Seyedeh Mahboubeh Sajjadian Amiri
  • Hadi Tabatabaee MalaziEmail author
  • Mahmood Ahmadi
Article

Abstract

Performance and lifetime of wireless sensor networks are tightly linked to the used routing protocol. Energy and memory efficiency are some of the main challenges of routing protocols. These challenges are more strict in large scale and dense networks. Numerous amount of routing approaches are published so far, emphasized on energy consumption. However, a few of them addresses the limitations of node memory. This paper introduces a new routing protocol called Bloom filter based routing protocol (BFRP). It reduces memory consumption by replacing a routing table with a Bloom filter. Since the approach is devised for clustered networks, a new clustering algorithm is introduced that takes remaining energy into the account for cluster head election. It also supports networks with churn. Several scenarios are simulated with NS2 and the results are compared to Coverage Preservation Clustering Protocol and Hybrid Energy-efficient Distributed Clustering algorithms. The results approve that BFRP improves energy consumption and show a significant decrease in memory usage.

Keywords

Routing protocol Clustering algorithm Bloom filter based routing BFRP Dynamic Bloom filter Memory efficiency Wireless sensor networks 

References

  1. 1.
    Alotaibi, E., & Mukherjee, B. (2012). A survey on routing algorithms for wireless ad-hoc and mesh networks. Computer Networks, 56(2), 940–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Karaki, J. N., & Kamal, A. E. (2004). Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless communications, 11(6), 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Challal, Y., Ouadjaout, A., Lasla, N., Bagaa, M., & Hadjidj, A. (2011). Secure and efficient disjoint multipath construction for fault tolerant routing in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(4), 1380–1397. (Advanced Topics in Cloud Computing).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, X., Wu, J., & Xu, J. (2006). Hint-based routing in wsns using scope decay bloom filters. In Networking, Architecture, and Storages. IWNAS’06. International workshop on (p. 8). IEEE.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tabatabaee Malazi, H., Zamanifar, K., & Dulman, S. O. (2011). Fed: Fuzzy event detection model for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Networks (IJWMN), 3(6), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mouradian, A., Aug-Blum, I., & Valois, F. (2014). Rtxp: A localized real-time mac-routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 67, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tabatabaee Malazi, H., Zamanifar, K., Pruteanu, A., & Dulman, S. (2014). Gossip-based density estimation in dynamic heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Autonomous and Adaptive Communications Systems, 7(1), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soro, S., & Heinzelman, W. B. (2009). Cluster head election techniques for coverage preservation in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(5), 955–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tabatabaee Malazi, H., Zamanifar, K., Khalili, A., & Dulman, S. O. (2013). Dec: Diversity-based energy-aware clustering for heterogeneous sensor networks. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks, 17(1–2), 53–72.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lotf, J. J., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Alguliev, R. M. (2010). Hierarchical routing in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In Computer Engineering and Technology (ICCET), 2nd international conference on (Vol. 3, pp 650–654).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar, D., Aseri, T. C., & Patel, R. B. (2009). Eehc: Energy efficient heterogeneous clustered scheme for wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 32(4), 662–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindsey, S., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2002). Pegasis: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In Aerospace conference proceedings. IEEE (Vol. 3, pp. 3–1125). IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manjeshwar, A., & Agrawal, D. P. (2001) Teen: A routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In Parallel and distributed processing symposium, international (Vol. 3, pp. 30189a–30189a). IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manjeshwar, A., & Agrawal, D. P. (2002). Apteen: A hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In Parallel and distributed processing symposium, international (Vol. 2, pp 0195b–0195b). IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan, H., & Perrig, A. (2004). Ace: An emergent algorithm for highly uniform cluster formation. In H. Karl., A. Wolisz & A. Willig (Eds.), Wireless sensor networks (pp. 154–171). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Demirbas, M., Arora, A., & Mittal, V. (2004) Floc: A fast local clustering service for wireless sensor networks. In Workshop on dependability issues in wireless ad hoc networks and sensor networks (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heinzelman, W. R., Kulik, J., & Balakrishnan, H. (1999). Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (pp. 174–185). ACM.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Younis, O., & Fahmy, S. (2004). Heed: A hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(4), 366–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Osano, T., Uchida, Y., & Ishikawa, N. (2008). Routing protocol using bloom filters for mobile ad hoc networks. In Mobile ad-hoc and sensor networks. The 4th international conference on (pp. 89–94). IEEE.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guo, D., He, Y., & Liu, Y. (2014). On the feasibility of gradient-based data-centric routing using bloom filters. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(1), 180–190.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pasquini, R., Magalhaes, M. F., Verdi, F. L., & Welin, A. (2010). Bloom filters in a landmark-based flat routing. In Communications (ICC), IEEE international conference on (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jerzak, Z., & Fetzer, C. (2008). Bloom filter based routing for content-based publish/subscribe. In Proceedings of the second international conference on distributed event-based systems (pp. 71–81). ACM.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koloniari, G., & Pitoura, E. (2004). Content-based routing of path queries in peer-to-peer systems. In E. Bertino., S. Christodoulakis., D. Plexousakis., V. Christophides., M. Koubarakis., K. Böhm & E. Ferrari (Eds.), Advances in database technology-EDBT (pp. 29–47). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In System sciences. Proceedings of the 33rd annual hawaii international conference on (pp 10–pp.) IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gupta, I., Riordan, D., & Sampalli, S. (2005). Cluster-head election using fuzzy logic for wireless sensor networks. In Communication networks and services research conference. Proceedings of the 3rd annual (pp 255–260). IEEE.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahmadi, M., & Wong, S. (2009). K-stage pipelined bloom filter for packet classification. In Computational science and engineering. CSE’09. international conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 64–70). IEEE.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Geravand, S., & Ahmadi, M. (2013). Bloom filter applications in network security: A state-of-the-art survey. Computer Networks, 57(18), 4047–4064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghanbari, P., Ahmadi, M., & Ahmadi, A. (2012). Error management and detection in computer networks using bloom filters. In Proceedings of the international conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics (pp. 551–556). ACM.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Geravand, S., & Ahmadi, M. (2014). An efficient and scalable plagiarism checking system using bloom filters. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 40(6), 1789–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bloom, B. H. (1970). Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors. Communications of the ACM, 13(7), 422–426.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guo, D., Jie, W., Chen, H., Yuan, Y., & Luo, X. (2010). The dynamic bloom filters. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(1), 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seyedeh Mahboubeh Sajjadian Amiri
    • 1
  • Hadi Tabatabaee Malazi
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mahmood Ahmadi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyIslamic Azad University, Kermanshah BranchKermanshahIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, GCShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Computer EngineeringUniversity of RaziKermanshahIran

Personalised recommendations