A New Ultralightweight RFID Protocol for Low-Cost Tags: R\(^{2}\)AP

Abstract

Several ultralightweight radio frequency identification (RFID) authentication protocols have been proposed in recent years. However, all of these protocols are reported later that they are vulnerable to various kinds of attacks (such as replay attack, de-synchronization attack, full disclosure attack, etc.) and/or have user privacy concerns. In this paper, we propose a new ultralightweight RFID protocol named reconstruction based RFID authentication protocol (R\(^{2}\)AP), which is based on the use of a new bitwise operation reconstruction. Operation reconstruction has three important properties: Hamming weight unpredictability, irreversibility and effectiveness. Some or all of these properties are absent in previous protocols and therefore has caused a lot of insecurity issues. The proposed R\(^{2}\)AP takes advantage of reconstruction to guarantee security of RFID system. Furthermore, we improve the Juels–Weis untraceability model so that the extended mathematic model can be used to analyze security functionality for ultralightweight RFID protocols. Our security analysis and performance evaluations demonstrate that (1) R\(^{2}\)AP can withstand all attacks mentioned in the paper and protect users’ privacy; (2) R\(^{2}\)AP is indeed an effective RFID protocol that can be implemented on low-cost tags.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    T-function (Triangular-function) refers to function that the \(i\)th bit of its output only depends on bits \(0,\ldots ,i\)t of its input(s), where the Least Significant Bit is indexed by 0. Obviously, operations exclusive or (XOR), and (AND), addition are T-functions. For formal definition of T-function, please refer to [14].

  2. 2.

    Actually, we can classify DoS attack into two groups: one is caused by the instinctive issues in wireless communications, named hard-DoS; the other one is caused by the de-synchronization between a tag and the back-end database, named soft-DOS. In this paper, we only consider the later form of DoS: soft-DoS.

References

  1. 1.

    Ahmadian, Z., Salmasizadeh, M., & Aref, M. R. (2012). Desynchronization attack on RAPP ultralightweight authentication protocol, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2012/490.

  2. 2.

    Ahmadian, Z., Salmasizadeh, M., & Aref, M. R. (2013). Recursive linear and differential cryptanalysis of ultralightweight authentication protocols. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 8, 1140–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alomair, B., Lazos, L., & Poovendran, R. (2007). Passive attacks on a class of authentication protocols for RFID. In K.-H. Nam & G. Rhee (Eds.), International conference on information security and cryptology-ICISC 2007. Seoul, Korea: Lecture notes in computer science.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Avoine, G., Carpent, X., & Martin, B. (2012). Privacy-friendly synchronized ultralightweight authentication protocols in the storm. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 25, 826–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Avoine, G., & Carpent, X. (2012). Yet another ultralightweight authentication protocol that is broken, in pre-proceeding of RFIDsec. Netherlands: Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Barasz, M., Boros, B., Ligeti, P., Loja, K., & Nagy, D. A. (2007). Breaking LMAP. In: Conference on RFID security, Malaga, Spain.

  7. 7.

    Cao, T., Bertino, E., & Lei, H. (2009). Security analysis of the SASI protocol. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 6, 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Castro, H., Tapiador, M. E., Lopez, P., & Quisquater, J. (2008). Cryptanalysis of the SASI ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol with modular rotations, arXiv preprint arXiv:0811.4257.

  9. 9.

    Chien, H. Y. (2007). SASI: A new ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol providing strong authentication and strong integrity. IEEE Transaction on Dependable and Secure Computing, 4, 337–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    David, M., & Prasad, N. R. (2009). Providing strong security and high privacy in low-cost RFID networks, In: Proceedings of security and privacy in mobile information and communication systems, MobiSec 2009, Heidelberg.

  11. 11.

    Eghdamian, A., & Samsudin, A. (2011). A secure protocol for ultralightweight radio frequency identification (RFID) tags. In Information engineering and information science—ICIEIS 2011, Vol. 251 of communication in computer and information science, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  12. 12.

    Jeon, I., & Yoon, E. (2013). A new ultra-lightweight RFID authentication protocol using merge and separation operations, 7, 2583–2593.

  13. 13.

    Juels, A., & Weis, S. A. (March 2007). Defining strong privacy for RFID. In Proceedings of fifth annual ieee international conference pervasive computing and communications, pp. 342–347.

  14. 14.

    Klimov, A., & Shamir, A. (2003). A new class of invertible mappings. In Proceedings of cryptographic hardware and embedded systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2523, pp. 470–483.

  15. 15.

    Lee, Y. C., Hsieh, Y. C., You, P. S., & Chen, T. C. (2009). A new ultralightweight RFID protocol with mutual authentication. In Proceedings of the 2009 WASE international conference on information engineering, vol. 1 (pp. 58–61). IEEE Computer Society.

  16. 16.

    Lee, Y. C. (2012). Two ultralightweight authentication protocols for low-cost RFID tags. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 6, 425–431.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Li, T. & Wang, G. (2007). Security analysis of two ultra-lightweight RFID authentication protocols. In Proceedings of 22nd IFIP TC-11 Int’1 information security conference, Sandton, Ganteng, South Africa.

  18. 18.

    Li, T., & Deng, R. (2007). Vulnerability analysis of EMAP-an efficient RFID mutual authentication protocol. In Proceedings of second international conference on availability, reliability, and security (AReS’07), Vienna, Austria.

  19. 19.

    Lo, N. W., Yeh, K.-H., & Chen, H.-Y. (2012). Analysis against secret redundancy mechanism for RFID authentication protocol. In 2012 IEEE international conference on, communication, network and satellite (ComNetSat). IEEE.

  20. 20.

    Peris-Lopez, P., Hernandez-Castro, J. C., Tapiador, J. M. E., & Li, T. (2010). Quasi-linear cryptanalysis of a secure RFID ultralightweight authentication protocol. In 6th China international conference on information security and cryptology-Inscrypt’10. Shanghai, China: Springer.

  21. 21.

    Peris-Lopez, P., Hernandez-Castro, J. C., Tapiador, J. M. E., & Ribagorda, A. (2006). EMAP: An efficient mutual authentication protocol for low-cost RFID tags. In O. T. M. Federated (Ed.) Conferences and workshop: IS workshop, Montpellier, France.

  22. 22.

    Peris-Lopez, P., Hernandez-Castro, J. C., Tapiador, J. M. E., & Ribagorda, A. (2006). LMAP: A real lightweight mutual authentication protocol for low-cost RFID tags. In Proceedings of 2nd workshop RFID security. Graz, Austria: Ecrypt.

  23. 23.

    Peris-Lopez, P., Hernandez-Castro, J. C., Tapiador, J. M. E., & Ribagorda, A. (2006). M\(^{2}\)AP: a minimalist mutual-authentication protocol for low-cost RFID tags. In Proceedings of 2006 international conference on ubiquitous intelligence and computing, Wuhan and Three Gorges.

  24. 24.

    Peris-Lopez, P., Hernandez-Castro, J. C., Tapiador, J. M. E., & Ribagorda, A. (2009). Advances in ultralightweight cryptography for low-cost RFID tags: Gossamer protocol. In Information security applications, pp. 56–68.

  25. 25.

    Peris-Lopez, P., Hernandez-Castro, J. C., Tapiador, J. M. E., & van der Lubbe, J. C. A. (2010). Security flaws in a recent ultralightweight RFID protocol, In: Workshop on RFID security-RFIDSec Asia’10, Singapore.

  26. 26.

    Phan, R. C. W. (2009). Cryptanlysis of a new ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol-SASI. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 6, 316–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sun, H. N., Ting, W. C., & Wang, K. H. (2011). On the Security of Chien’s ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 8, 315–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tagra, D., Rahman, M., & Sampalli, S. (2010). Technique for preventing DoS attacks on RFID systems, In: 18th international conference on software telecommunications and computer networks-SoftCOM’10. Bol, Island of Brac, Croatia: IEEE Computer Society.

  29. 29.

    Tian, Y., Chen, G., & Li, J. (2012). A new ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol with permutation. IEEE Communications Letters, 16, 702–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang, S., Han, Z., Liu, S., & Chen, D. (2012). Security analysis of RAPP: an RFID authentication protocol based on Permutation, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2012/327.

  31. 31.

    Zhuang, X., Zhu, Y., & Chang, C. C. (2013). Security Analysis of Ultralightweight RFID Protocols. Technique Report.

  32. 32.

    Zhuang, X., Wang, Z. H., Chang, C. C., & Zhu, Y. (2013). Security analysis of a new ultra-lightweight RFID protocol and its improvement. Journal of Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, 4, 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuang, X., Zhu, Y. & Chang, CC. A New Ultralightweight RFID Protocol for Low-Cost Tags: R\(^{2}\)AP. Wireless Pers Commun 79, 1787–1802 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1958-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ultralightweight
  • RFID protocol
  • Hamming weight
  • Low-cost tag
  • Wireless authentication