Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamically Partitioned Hierarchical Constant Modulus Algorithm for Variable Delay Spread Channels

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Constant Modulus Algorithm (CMA) adopts the constant modulus (CM) criterion to minimize the deviation of the equalizer output from a fixed value. However it has two drawbacks: (1) slow rate of convergence (2) the likelihood of getting trapped in a local minimum. The problem gets even worse when the channel delay spread varies rapidly as the filter length cannot match the delay spread. If the filter length is significantly longer than the delay spread, the convergence rate can be slow. In this paper, we improve the performance of the standard CMA by using a dynamically partitioned hierarchical structure to organize the taps of a filter. The filter length is dynamically partitioned according to the delay spread such that they are tightly matched. Preferably, the length of a sub-filter is slightly longer than the delay spread of the channel. The performance evaluation is divided into two parts. In Part I, we do simulation runs for both the cost functions and cost surfaces comparing the standard CMA, where the filter length is significantly longer than the delay spread, and the dynamically partitioned CMA, where the filter length matches the delay spread. In Part II, an analysis is provided to show that the proposed partitioned scheme can speed up the convergence rate and reduce the cost function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sato Y. (1975) A method of self-recovering equalization for multi-level amplitude modulation. IEEE Transactions on Communications 23: 679–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Godard, D. N. (1980). Self-recovering equalization and carrier tracking in two-dimensional data communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-28, pp. 1867–1875.

  3. Treichler J. R., Agee B. G. (1983) A new approach to multipath correction of constant modulus signals. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech and Signal processing 31(2): 459–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haykin S. (1996) Adaptive equalizer theory (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson C. R., Jr., Schinter, P., Endres, T. J., Behm, J. D., Brown, D. R., & Casas, R. A. (1998). Blind equalization using the constant modulus criterion: A Review. Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 1927–1950

  6. Schniter, P. (2000). Blind estimation without priors: Performance, convergence, and efficient implementation. Ph. D. Dissertation, Cornell University.

  7. Schniter P., Johnson C. R. Jr. (2000) Sufficient conditions for the local convergence of constant modulus algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 48(10): 2785–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schniter P, Johnson C. R. Jr. (2000) Bounds for the MSE performance of constant modulus estimator. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 46(7): 2544–2560

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y., Liu K. J. R. (1996) Static and dynamic convergence behavior of adaptive blind equalizers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 44(11): 2736–2745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y., Ding Z. (1995) Convergence analysis of finite length blind adaptive equalizers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 43(9): 2120–2129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y., Liu K. J. R., Ding Z. (1996) Length and cost dependent local minima of unconstrained blind channel equalizers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 44(11): 2726–2735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayyas K. (2005) Performance analysis of the deficient length LMS adaptive algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 53(8): 2727–2734

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Z., Bose, T., Xiao, L., & Thamvichai, R. (2006). Performance analysis of the deficient length EDS adaptive algorithm. IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuit and Systems, 2006 APCCAS, 4–7 Dec. 2006, pp. 222–226.

  14. Shynk, J. J., Gooch, R. P., Krishnamurthy, G., & Chan, C. K. (2007). A comparative performance study of several blind equalization algorithms. Proceedings of the SPIE, Adaptive Signal Processing. Vol. 1565, pp. 102–117, San Diego, CA

  15. Jablon N. K. (1992) Joint blind equalization, carrier recovery, and timing recovery for high order QAM constellations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 40: 1383–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tai-Kuo Woo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woo, TK. Dynamically Partitioned Hierarchical Constant Modulus Algorithm for Variable Delay Spread Channels. Wireless Pers Commun 62, 395–410 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-010-0060-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-010-0060-2

Keywords

Navigation