Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bio-inspired deep residual neural network learning model for QoS routing enhancement in mobile ad-hoc networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs) always the quality-of-service (QoS) routing problem remains to exist and as a non-deterministic polynomial hard problem it is necessary to improve the QoS parameters to the most possible extent. For the considered MANET model, it is important to develop a suitable model that is capable of improving and enhancing the quality-of-service metrics. In this research study, a novel bio-inspired deep residual neural network (DResNet) architecture algorithm is developed over a MANET model for designing a most effective QoS routing protocol. The main aim of this proposed study is to locate a better routing path with satisfied QoS metrics for the MANET model and the bio-inspired deep learning neural model gets trained to meet the set fitness function. The new DResNet architecture operates with limited quantity of training data and its weights are optimized with novel IIWGSO technique. The proposed IIWGSO based DResNet model with the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) protocol gets trained for the MANET model and its effectiveness is justified with QoS constraints being satisfied. The new IIWGSO-DResNet-AODV architecture resulted in better fitness value and QoS metrics proving its superiority compared to the existing techniques from previous literatures for the same MANET model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is generated from the NS2 Simulator Environment and will be made available on publication. It is also attached in the EXCEL file submitted as supporting documents,

References

  1. Bapu, T., Anitha, R., Soundararajan, S., Nagaraju, V., Nagappan, P., & Daniel, A. (2022). GAMAN–genetic algorithm in mobile adhoc networks for creating systematic QoS. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 3599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandrasekaran, K., & Selvaraj, T. (2022). Differential evolution CapsNet model for QoS routing enhancement in wireless networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 35(2), e4146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasan, N., Mishra, A., & Ray, A. K. (2022). Fuzzy logic based cross-layer design to improve quality of service in mobile ad-hoc networks for next-gen cyber physical system. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 35, 101099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sucharitha, K., & Latha, R. (2022). Designing an ML-based congestion detection algorithm for routing data in MANETs. In International conference on computing, communication, electrical and biomedical systems (pp. 3–13). Springer.

  5. Chintalapalli, R. M., & Ananthula, V. R. (2018). M-LionWhale: Multi-objective optimisation model for secure routing in mobile ad-hoc network. IET Communications, 12(12), 1406–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kout, A., Labed, S., Chikhi, S., & Bourennane, E. B. (2018). AODVCS, a new bio-inspired routing protocol based on cuckoo search algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Networks, 24(7), 2509–2519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tripathia, A., Mekathotia, V. K., Waghuldea, I., Patela, K., & Balasubramaniana, N. (2021). Neural network aided optimal routing with node classification for adhoc wireless network. In CEUR Workshop Proc (vol. 2889, pp. 43–54).

  8. Vivekananda, G. N., Lavanya, B., & Reddy, P. (2021). DLM technique for QoS improvement in MANETS. Wireless Networks, 27(4), 2867–2877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaushik, S., Tripathi, K., Gupta, R., & Mahajan, P. (2021). Futuristic analysis of machine learning based routing protocols in wireless ad hoc networks. In 2021 Fourth international conference on computational intelligence and communication technologies (CCICT) (pp. 324–329). IEEE.

  10. Murugan, S., & Jeyakarthic. (2019). Optimal deep neural network based classification model for intrusion detection in mobile Adhoc networks. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 11(10), 1374–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, Y., Lei, M., Li, M., Zhao, M., & Hu, B. (2019). A new anti-jamming strategy based on deep reinforcement learning for MANET. In 2019 IEEE 89th vehicular technology conference (VTC2019-Spring) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  12. Laqtib, S., Yassini, K. E., & Hasnaoui, M. L. (2019). A deep learning methods for intrusion detection systems based machine learning in manet. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on smart city applications (pp. 1–8).

  13. Zou, X., Yang, R., Yin, C., & Wu, Q. (2019). Research on node deployment in different terrain of MANET based on relational deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd international conference on algorithms, computing and artificial intelligence (pp. 565–569).

  14. Alkadhmi, M., Uçan, O. N., & Ilyas, M. (2020). An efficient and reliable routing method for hybrid mobile ad hoc networks using deep reinforcement learning. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2020.

  15. Chandrasekaran, S., Kannan, S., & Subburathinam, K. (2021). DeepSense—Deep neural network framework to improve the network lifetime of IoT-MANETs. International Journal of Communication Systems, 34(3), e4650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haridas, Prasath, A. R. (2021). Bi-fitness swarm optimizer: Blockchain assisted secure swarm intelligence routing protocol for MANET. 12(5), 1442–1458.

  17. Danilchenko, K., Azoulay, R., Reches, S., & Haddad, Y. (2022). Deep learning method for delay minimization in MANET. ICT Express, 8(1), 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao, M., & Singh, N. (2018). Energy efficient QoS aware hierarchical KF-MAC routing protocol in MANET. Wireless Personal Communications, 101(2), 635–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rawate, A. M., & Shinde, U. B. (2019). Efficient and reliable routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 16(5–6), 1854–1861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reddy, S. (2018). Multi-path selection based on fractional cuckoo search algorithm for QoS aware routing in MANET. Sensor Review.

  21. Sra, P., & Chand, S. (2019). QoS in mobile ad-hoc networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 105(4), 1599–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vandana, N. K. (2019). An energy efficient enhanced hybrid routing protocol for MANET utilizing artificial bee colony. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering., 8(10), 508–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muneeswari, B., & Manikandan, M. S. K. (2019). Defending against false data attacks in 3D grid-based MANET using soft computing approaches. Soft Computing, 23(18), 8579–8595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ben Chigra, Y., Ghadi, A., & Bouhorma, M. (2021). A survey of optimization techniques for routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks. In Emerging trends in ICT for sustainable development (pp. 129–139). Springer.

  25. Subbaiah, C. V., & Kannayaram, G. (2021). Heuristic ant colony and reliable fuzzy QoS routing for mobile ad hoc network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1–12.

  26. Devi, V. S., Hegde, N. P., & Kumar, C. N. (2021). Energy efficient clustering using PSO and fuzzy logic for hybrid MANETs. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences., 16(22), 2354–2362.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sarkar, D., Choudhury, S., & Majumder, A. (2021). Enhanced-Ant-AODV for optimal route selection in mobile ad-hoc network. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 33(10), 1186–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arivarasan, S., Prakash, S., & Surendran, S. (2022). An efficient QOS aware routing using improved sensor modality-based butterfly optimization with packet scheduling for MANET. In Intelligent data communication technologies and internet of things (pp. 463–476). Springer.

  29. Singaravelan, M., & Mariappan, B. (2022). Reinforcement energy efficient ant colony optimization of mobile ad hoc multipath routing performance enhancement. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 19(2), 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumari, P., & Sahana, S. K. (2022). Swarm based hybrid ACO-PSO meta-heuristic (HAPM) for QoS multicast routing optimization in MANETs. Wireless Personal Communications, 123(2), 1145–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alameri, I. A., & Komarkova, J. (2022). Performance and statistical analysis of ant colony route in mobile ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 12(3), 2088–8708.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Subbaiah, C. V., & Govinda, K. (2022). A bio inspired optimization with reliable QoS routing through efficient packet transmission in mobile ad-hoc network. Renewable Energy Focus, 41, 188–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsiropoulou, E. E., Paruchuri, S. T., & Baras, J. S. (2017). Interest, energy and physical-aware coalition formation and resource allocation in smart IoT applications. In 2017 51st Annual conference on information sciences and systems (CISS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  34. Mandhare, V. V., Thool, V. R., & Manthalkar, R. R. (2016). QoS routing enhancement using metaheuristic approach in mobile ad-hoc network. Computer Networks, 110, 180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Asgharzadeh, H., Ghaffari, A., Masdari, M., & Gharehchopogh, F. S. (2023). Anomaly-based intrusion detection system in the internet of things using a convolutional neural network and multi-objective enhanced capuchin search algorithm. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing.

  36. Velayudhan, N. C., Anitha, A., & Madanan, M. (2022). An optimisation driven deep residual network for Sybil attack detection with reputation and trust-based misbehaviour detection in VANET. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 1–24.

  37. Sangeetha Francelin, V. F., Daniel, J., & Velliangiri, S. (2022). Intelligent agent and optimization-based deep residual network to secure communication in UAV network. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(9), 5508–5529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ozer, D. J. (1985). Correlation and the coefficient of determination. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bairwa, A. K., & Joshi, S. (2022). An improved scheme in AODV routing protocol for enhancement of QoS in MANET. In Data engineering for smart systems (pp. 183–190). Springer.

  40. Prasad, M., Tripathi, S., & Dahal, K. (2023). An intelligent intrusion detection and performance reliability evaluation mechanism in mobile ad-hoc networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 119, 105760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Asha, A., Arunachalam, R., Poonguzhali, I., Urooj, S., & Alelyani, S. (2023). Optimized RNN-based performance prediction of IoT and WSN-oriented smart city application using improved honey badger algorithm. Measurement, 210, 112505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, RVS College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, 641 402, India

    S. Tamizharasi

  2. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Dr.NGP Institute of Technology, Kalapatti, Coimbatore, 641 048, India

    B. Arunadevi

  3. Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Arunachal Pradesh, Jote, Arunachal Pradesh, 791 113, India

    S. N. Deepa

Authors
  1. S. Tamizharasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Arunadevi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. N. Deepa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Tamizharasi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors possess no conflict of interest for publishing this research contribution.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 23 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamizharasi, S., Arunadevi, B. & Deepa, S.N. Bio-inspired deep residual neural network learning model for QoS routing enhancement in mobile ad-hoc networks. Wireless Netw 29, 3541–3565 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03424-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03424-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation