Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

DLM technique for QoS improvement in MANETS

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless networks are used extensively in communication technologies. From Tesla to date researchers, many are working on wireless data transmission techniques and technologies. Despite the immense progressions over the past decade, there are precise hurdles that the industry endures to face. Bandwidth restrictions, latency problems, and device compatibility issues prevent the viewer from meeting seamless data transmissions. Many devices used for communication are used with the wireless interface and are proficient in transmitting data efficiently to the communication range. The growth in data communication requirements increases the network traffic and results in a network bottleneck. There are more challenges for Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) due to the additional overhead of resource constraints. Congestion leads to depletion of the node's energy, deterioration of network performance, and increased network latency and packet loss. As a result, energy-efficient and reliable state-of-the-art congestion control protocols must be designed to detect, notify and control congestion effectively. To minimize the packet loss in MANETs using Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), we proposed a data loss minimization technique (DLMT). Results show that enhanced DLMT outperforms by 18% compared to state-of-the-art proven congestion control mechanisms. DLMT improves the Quality of Service (QoS) constraints and improves performance by reducing the delay in better throughput, which can be seen by analyzing experimental results. The proposed coordination process's scalability and robustness are shown in good agreement with simulation results and analytic results for the stochastic model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vivekananda, G. N., & Reddy, P. C. (2018). Performance evaluation of TCP, UDP, and SCTP in MANETS. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(9), 3087–3092

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vivekananda GN, Reddy PC (2017) Critical Analysis of Congestion Control for the Future Networks In Emerging Trends in Electrical. Communications, and Information Technologies. Springer, Singapore

  3. Ren, F., He, T., Das, S. K., & Lin, C. (2011). Traffic-aware dynamic routing to alleviate congestion in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 22(9), 1585–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basu A, Lin A, Ramanathan S (2003) Routing using potentials: a dynamic traffic-aware routing algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, ACM, 37–48

  5. Tang, D., Li, T., & Ren, J. (2017). Congestion-aware routing scheme based on traffic information in sensor networks. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks, 35(3–4), 281–300

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sovaldi SR, Moghaddam MH (2014) Fuzzy TADR: A fuzzy extension to TADR algorithm for congestion control in wireless sensor network. In2014 Iranian Conference on Intelligent Systems (ICIS), IEEE, 1–5.

  7. Lin, Q. M., Wang, R. C., Jian, G. U., & Sun, L. J. (2011). Novel congestion control approach in wireless multimedia sensor networks. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 18(2), 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sangwan, Y. S. (2015). To alleviate congestion in TADR by using combined dominating set technique. Wireless Sensor Networks, 7(2), 5–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ahuja, R. K., Magnanti, T. L., Orlin, J. B., & Weihe, K. (1995). Network flows: Theory, algorithms and applications. ZOR-Methods and Models of Operations Research, 41(3), 252–254

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, E. J., Anderson, T. E., Gribble, S. D., Karlin, A. R., & Savage, S. (2002). A quantitative evaluation of traffic-aware routing strategies. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 32(1), 67–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stevens WR, Wright, GR (1995) TCP/IP illustrated: the implementation. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc

  12. Shah, S. A., Nazir, B., & Khan, I. A. (2017). Congestion control algorithms in wireless sensor networks: Trends and opportunities. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 29(3), 236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan D, Kim DS (2014) Dynamic traffic-aware routing algorithm for multi-sink wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks (10220038), 20(6)

  14. Tychogiorgos G, Gkelias A, Leung KK (2012) Utility-proportional fairness in wireless networks. In: 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications-(PIMRC), 839–844.

  15. Vivekananda, G. N., & Ilknur, A. (2020). A congestion avoidance mechanism in multimedia transmission over MANET using SCTP multi-streaming. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(23), 16823–16844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vivekananda, G. N., & Reddy, P. C. (2019). Packet loss minimising approach based on traffic prediction for multi-streaming communication over MANET. International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing, 17(1), 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bajaj, L., Takai, M., Ahuja, R., Tang, K., Bagrodia, R., & Gerla, M. (1999). Glomosim: A scalable network simulation environment. UCLA computer science department technical report, 990027(1999), 213

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kastrinogiannis T, Tsiropoulou EE & Papavassiliou S (2008) Utility-based uplink power control in CDMA wireless networks with real-time services. In: International Conference on Ad-Hoc Networks and Wireless, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 307–320.

  19. Huang, X. L., Ma, X., & Hu, F. (2018). Machine learning and intelligent communications. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(1), 68–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India

    G. N. Vivekananda

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, JNTUACEP, Pulivendula, Andhra Pradesh, India

    B. Muni Lavanya

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, S.V. College of Engineering, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

    P. Dileep Kumar Reddy

Authors
  1. G. N. Vivekananda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Muni Lavanya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Dileep Kumar Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. N. Vivekananda.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vivekananda, G.N., Lavanya, B.M. & Reddy, P.D.K. DLM technique for QoS improvement in MANETS. Wireless Netw 27, 2867–2877 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-021-02622-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-021-02622-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation