Advertisement

Cross-antenna interference cancellation and channel estimation for MISO-FBMC/QAM-based eMBMS

  • Beom Kwon
  • Sanghoon Lee
Article

Abstract

To improve bit error rate (BER) and data rate performance in filter bank multicarrier-quadrature amplitude modulation (FBMC/QAM)-based evolved multimedia broadcast multicast system (eMBMS), effective channel estimation using iterative interference cancellation has been introduced in literature. This research mainly has been based on single-input single-output FBMC/QAM-based eMBMS. In contrast, in multiple-input single-output (MISO) FBMC/QAM-based eMBMS, there exists a residual interference from other antennas, and the influence of it on channel estimation for multiple antennas remains still unverified. In this paper, we derive the residual interference in MISO-FBMC/QAM-based eMBMS in order to analyze and clarify the influence of the residual interference on channel estimation. In addition, we propose new reference symbol (RS) structures for the \(2\times 1\) and \(4\times 1\) MISO-FBMC/QAM-based eMBMSs that are more robust against the residual interference. Finally, we propose a cross-antenna interference cancellation -based channel estimation method to eliminate the residual interference and improve the channel estimation accuracy. The simulation results show that the proposed RS structures and channel estimation method improve the mean squared error, BER, and effective data rate.

Keywords

Channel estimation eMBMS Interference cancellation MISO-FBMC/QAM Reference symbol structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2013R1A1A2A10011764).

References

  1. 1.
    3GPP TS 22.146 V13.0.0. (2015). Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS); Stage 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    3GPP TS 23.246 V13.3.0. (2015). Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS); Architecture and functional description.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    3GPP TS 25.346 V13.0.0. (2015). Introduction of the Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS) in the Radio Access Network (RAN); Stage 2.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    3GPP TS 25.992 V13.0.0. (2015). Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (MBMS); UTRAN/GERAN Requirements.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siohan, P., Siclet, C., & Lacaille, N. (2002). Analysis and design of OFDM/OQAM systems based on filterbank theory. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(5), 1170–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, H., et al. (2010). Spectral efficiency comparison of OFDM/FBMC for uplink cognitive radio networks. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing,. doi: 10.1155/2010/621808.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellanger, M., et al. (2010). FBMC physical layer: A primer. PHYDYAS.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goljahani, A., Vangelista, L., & Maso, M. (2008). Superimposed technique for OFDM/OQAM based digital terrestrial television broadcasting. In IEEE 25th convention of electrical and electronics engineers in Israel (pp. 323–327).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goljahani, A., et al. (2009). Superimposed sequence versus pilot aided channel estimations for next generation DVB-T systems. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 55(1), 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arndt, D. M., & da Rocha, C. A. F. (2011). Performance comparison between OFDM and FBMC systems in digital TV transmission. In IEEE Latin-American conference on communications (LATINCOM) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, H., et al. (2017). Mutual interference analysis of FBMC based return channel for bidirectional T-DMB system. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(5), 3829–3842.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zakaria, R., Le Ruyet, D., & Bellanger, M. (2010). Maximum likelihood detection in spatial multiplexing with FBMC. In European wireless conference (pp. 1038–1041).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lélé, C., Legouable, R., & Siohan, P. (2008). Channel estimation with scattered pilots in OFDM/OQAM. In IEEE 9th workshop on signal processing advances in wireless communications (pp. 286–290).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lélé, C. (2012). Iterative scattered-based channel estimation method for OFDM/OQAM. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing,. doi: 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-42.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nam, H., et al. (2014). A new filter-bank multicarrier system for QAM signal transmission and reception. In IEEE International conference on communications (pp. 5227–5232).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nam, H., et al. (2016). A new filter-bank multicarrier system with two prototype filters for QAM symbols transmission and reception. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(9), 5998–6009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cho, Y. H., et al. (2015). Channel estimation performance of OQAM/FBMC and QAM/FBMC systems. In IEEE International symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS) (pp. 551–555).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lélé, C., et al. (2008). Channel estimation methods for preamblebased OFDM/OQAM modulations. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 19(7), 741–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lélé, C., Siohan, P., & Legouable, R. (2008). 2 dB better than CP-OFDM with OFDM/OQAM for preamble-based channel estimation. In IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1302–1306).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Du, J., & Signell, S. (2009). Novel preamble-based channel estimation for OFDM/OQAM systems. In IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kofidis, E., & Katselis, D. (2011). Improved interference approximation method for preamble-based channel estimation in FBMC/OQAM. In IEEE 19th European signal processing conference (pp. 1603–1607).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kwon, B., Kim, S., Jeon, D., & Lee, S. (2016). Iterative interference cancellation and channel estimation in evolved multimedia broadcast multicast system using filter-bank multicarrier-quadrature amplitude modulation. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 62(4), 864–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ITU-R M.1225. (1997). Guidelines for evaluation of radio transmission technologies for IMT-2000. International telecommunication union-radiocommunication.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Failli, M. (1989). COST 207 digital Land Mobile Radio Communications. Commission of the European cimmunities.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations