Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient cooperative multicarrier underwater acoustic communication over the Persian Gulf channel

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 31 October 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Real-time and reliable transmission with high data rate is one of the most crucial design issues in underwater acoustic (UWA) communications. This paper is part of an operational project in the Persian Gulf which is known as a shallow water channel worldwide. Building on the promising combination of cooperative and multicarrier techniques, we first address the design of an efficient UWA communication system over the Persian Gulf channel. We assume sparse and frequency-selective Rician fading, non-white correlated Gaussian ambient noise, and non-uniform Doppler distortion among subcarriers. Based on the extensive field measurements, we adopt a comprehensive channel model including modified sound speed profile, modified absorption coefficient, reflections from the surface and bottom of the sea, and modified ambient noise model. In our work, carrier frequency is efficiently determined based on the system and environmental parameters. In addition, a simple criterion for Doppler scale calculation is proposed. Moreover, based on the approximate auto-correlation function of the ambient noise, whitening filter is utilized at the receiver. In many applications of underwater acoustic sensors network (UW-ASN), nodes may not be big enough to have more than one antenna. Therefore, to achieve spatial diversity, cooperation between nodes can be a proper alternate method. In another part of this research, toward a proper approach that each node operates under full-duplex mode, we address a cooperative virtually-aided transmission scenario which is called cooperative multiple input single output. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed models can significantly improve the bit error rate performance of UW-ASN in the Persian Gulf channel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 31 October 2017

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the author group, where Dr. Seyed Mehdi Hosseini Andargoli was not included as a co-author of the article. The correct list of authors has been published with this erratum.

References

  1. Kumar, P., Trivedi, V. K., & Kumar, P. (2015, February). Recent trends in multicarrier underwater acoustic communications. In Underwater technology (UT), 2015 IEEE (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

  2. Martins, M. S., Pinto, N., Carmo, J. P., & Cabral, J. (2014, August). High data rate acoustic modem for underwater applications. In Telecommunications symposium (ITS), 2014 international (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  3. Ahmed, S., Javaid, N., Khan, F. A., Durrani, M. Y., Ali, A., Shaukat, A., et al. (2015). Co-UWSN: Cooperative energy-efficient protocol for underwater WSNs. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2015, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tu, K., Duman, T. M., Proakis, J. G., & Stojanovic, M. (2010, November). Cooperative MIMO-OFDM communications: Receiver design for Doppler-distorted underwater acoustic channels. In Signals, systems and computers (ASILOMAR), 2010 conference record of the forty fourth asilomar conference on (pp. 1335–1339). IEEE.

  5. Al-Dharrab, S., Uysal, M., & Duman, T. M. (2013). Cooperative underwater acoustic communications [Accepted From Open Call]. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 51(7), 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Uysal, M. (Ed.). (2009). Cooperative communications for improved wireless network transmission: Framework for virtual antenna array applications: Framework for virtual antenna array applications. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, S., & Wang, Z. H. (2014). OFDM for underwater acoustic communications. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng, X. (2016). Reliable and energy-efficient cooperative OFDM communications over underwater acoustic channels (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University. Libraries).

  9. Wan, L., Zhou, H., Wilson, D., Hanson, J., Zhou, S., & Shi, Z. (2014). Analysis of underwater OFDM performance during a 2-month deployment in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Technology Society Journal, 48(6), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Wan, L., Zhou, H., Zhou, S., & Xu, X. (2015). OFDM-modulated dynamic coded cooperation in underwater acoustic channels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 40(1), 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yan, H., Wan, L., Zhou, S., Shi, Z., Cui, J. H., Huang, J., et al. (2012). DSP based receiver implementation for OFDM acoustic modems. Physical Communication, 5(1), 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, C., Xu, Y., Wang, Q., Diao, B., An, Z., Chen, Z., & Luo, Z. (2016). FDCA: A full-duplex collision avoidance MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks.

  13. Yang, J., Zhang, J., & Qiao, G. (2014, November). Full-duplex, relative clock based and collision free protocol for underwater acoustic networks. In Proceedings of the international conference on underwater networks and systems (pp. 29–35). ACM.

  14. http://www.subsea2020.com/acoustic-modems/cmxm.

  15. Nouri, H., Uysal, M., & Panayirci, E. (2016). Information theoretical performance analysis and optimisation of cooperative underwater acoustic communication systems. IET Communications, 10(7), 812–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naderi, M., Patzold, M., & Zajic, A. G. (2014, July). A geometry-based channel model for shallow underwater acoustic channels under rough surface and bottom scattering conditions. In Communications and electronics (ICCE), 2014 IEEE fifth international conference on (pp. 112–117). IEEE.

  17. van Walree, P. A., & Otnes, R. (2013). Ultrawideband underwater acoustic communication channels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38(4), 678–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qarabaqi, P., & Stojanovic, M. (2013). Statistical characterization and computationally efficient modeling of a class of underwater acoustic communication channels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38(4), 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, S. M., Byun, S. H., Kim, S. G., Kim, D. J., Kim, S., & Lim, Y. K. (2013). Underwater acoustic channel characterization at 6 and 12 kHz in a shallow water near Jeju island. In Proc. Oceans (pp. 1–4), San Diego, CA, USA.

  20. Aref, A. D., & Arand, B. A. (2010, December). Design and simulation of a new model for shallow water multipath acoustic channel in the Persian Gulf. In Telecommunications (IST), 2010 5th international symposium on (pp. 882–888). IEEE.

  21. Aref, A. D., Jannati, M., & Vakili, V. T. (2011). Design and simulation of a secure and robust underwater acoustic communication system in the Persian Gulf. Communications and Network, 3, 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aref, A. D. (2016). Enhanced cooperative underwater acoustic communication over the Persian Gulf channel (Doctoral Dissertation, Babol University of technology. In Persian).

  23. Medwin, H., & Clay, C. S. (1997). Fundamentals of acoustical oceanography. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Francois, R. E., & Garrison, G. R. (1982). Sound absorption based on ocean measurements: Part I: Pure water and magnesium sulfate contributions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(3), 896–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coates, R. F. (1990). Underwater acoustic systems. Hong Kong: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Brekhovskikh, L. M., & Lysanov, Y. P. (2003). Fundamentals of ocean acoustics (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Nabar, R. U., Bölcskei, H., & Kneubühler, F. W. (2004). Fading relay channels: Performance limits and space-time signal design. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 22(6), 1099–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alamouti, S. M. (1998). A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(8), 1451–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wan, L., Wang, Z., Zhou, S., Yang, T. C., & Shi, Z. (2012). Performance comparison of Doppler scale estimation methods for underwater acoustic OFDM. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2012, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li, B., Zhou, S., Stojanovic, M., & Freitag, L. (2006, September). Pilot-tone based ZP-OFDM demodulation for an underwater acoustic channel. In OCEANS 2006 (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  31. Mason, S. F., Berger, C. R., Zhou, S., & Willett, P. (2008). Detection, synchronization, and Doppler scale estimation with multicarrier waveforms in underwater acoustic communication. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(9), 1638–1649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yao, Y., & Giannakis, G. B. (2005). Blind carrier frequency offset estimation in SISO, MIMO, and multiuser OFDM systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 53(1), 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdollah Doosti-Aref.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 2.

Table 2 Parameter reference

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doosti-Aref, A., Ebrahimzadeh, A. Efficient cooperative multicarrier underwater acoustic communication over the Persian Gulf channel. Wireless Netw 24, 1265–1278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1404-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1404-y

Keywords

Navigation