Wireless Networks

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 1349–1367 | Cite as

Improving mobile network performance with two queueing buffer allocations of priority-based queueing scheme

  • Fanpyn LiuEmail author
  • Chen-Hua Fu


As current mobile core network systems are expected to evolve into all-IP networks, packet switching will be a prerequisite for all mobile applications. Next-generation mobile networks, as envisioned by ITU-T, are packet-based networks capable of providing consistent and ubiquitous service to end users, independent of the network, access technology, and device used. This study discusses the differentiated packet forwarding performance of four major types of mobile network traffic under the proposed mobile network priority-based queueing (MPQ) scheme with two queueing buffer allocations, namely dynamic queueing buffer (DQB) allocation and overflow queueing buffer (OQB) allocation. As different queueing buffer allocations are adopted to store arriving packets in DQB and OQB, the MPQ scheme shows different packet forwarding performance under these two methods. In this study, we use ns2 (Network Simulator version 2) as the simulation platform to simulate several scenarios. The simulation results show that the MPQ scheme is able to support differentiated packet forwarding behavior for mobile traffic with both DQB and OQB allocations in a mobile core network. Some issues were identified in the MPQ scheme with both DQB and OQB allocation, which will need to be addressed.


Priority-based queueing MPQ scheme DQB allocation OQB allocation 


  1. 1.
    Antipolis, S. (2011). NGMN Alliance Joins 3GPP as Partner.
  2. 2.
    Kibria, M. R., & Jamalipour, A. (2007). On designing issues of the next generation mobile network. IEEE Network, 21(1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knightstone, K., Morita, N., & Towle, T. (2005). NGN architecture: Generic principles, functional architecture, and implementation. IEEE Communication Magazine, 43(10), 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghosh, A., Ratasuk, R., Mondal, B., Mangalvedhe, N., & Thomas, T. (2010). LTE-advanced: Next-generation wireless broadband technology. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(3), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z., & Weiss, W. (1998). An architecture for differentiated services, RFC2475.
  6. 6.
    Robles, T., Kadelka, A., Velayos, H., Lappetelainen, A., Kassler, A., Li, H., et al. (2001). QoS support for an all IP system beyond 3G. IEEE Communications Magazine, 39(8), 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mirjalily, G., & Ahmadian, M. (2008). A new approach in scheduling for differentiated services networks (pp. 99–111). US: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maniatis, S. I., Nikolouzou, E. G., & Venieris, I. S. (2002). QoS issues in the converged 3G wireless and wired networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heinanen, J., Baker, F., Weiss, W., & Wroclawski, J. (1999). Assured Forwarding PHB Group, RFC2597.
  10. 10.
    Floyd, S., & Jacobson, V. (1993). Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1(4), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allman, M., Paxson, V., & Blanton, E. (2009). TCP congestion control, RFC5681.
  12. 12.
    Floyd, S. (1994). TCP and explicit congestion notification. ACM Computer Communication Review, 24(5), 8–23.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Floyd, S. (1997). RED: Discussions of setting parameters.
  14. 14.
    Chen, W., & Yang, S. H. (2009). The mechanism of adapting RED parameters to TCP traffic. Computer Communications, 32(13–14), 1525–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yun, C., & Perros, H. (2010). QoS control for NGN: A survey of techniques. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 18(4), 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    3GPP TS 23.107. v10.2.0. (2012). Quality and service (QoS) concept and architecture, release 10.
  17. 17.
    Jaiswal, N. K. (1968). Priority queues. New York: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gross, D., Shortle, J. F., Thompson, J. M., & Harris, C. M. (2008). Fundamentals of queueing theory (4th edn). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, F., Fu, C. H., & Yang, C. (2008). A study on performance comparison of priority-based queueing scheme with two queueing buffer allocations in an UMTS core network gateway. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Technology, Applications, and Systems (Mobility ‘08). ACM, (pp. 45–52).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fu, C. H. (2010). A study on differentiated service queuing scheme with an overflow buffer allocation within a UMTS core network. Wireless Personal Communications, 55(3), 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McMillan, D. (1995). Delay analysis of a cellular mobile priority queueing system. IEEE/ACM Transaction Networking, 3(3), 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang, X., & Vaidya, N. (2006). Priority scheduling in wireless ad hoc networks. Wireless Networks, 12(3), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferng, H. W., Setiadji, C., & Leonovich, A. (2011). Fair round robin binary countdown to achieve QoS guarantee and fairness in WLANs. Wireless Networks, 17(5), 1259–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ji, L., Arvanitis, T. N., & Woolley, S. I. (2003). Fair weighted round robin scheduling scheme for DiffServ networks. Electronics Letters, 39(3), 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Network Simulator-ns2. (2010).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringChung Cheng Institute of Technology, National Defense UniversityTaoyuanROC
  2. 2.Department of Information ManagementCollege of Management, National Defense UniversityTaipeiROC

Personalised recommendations